Roger Stone admitted to collusion in deleted tweet:

[EveHammond13]

Link to tweet

[DetlefK]

1. Not only is he contradicting himself, he's also contradicting Wikileaks:

First Roger Stone claimed that he had a perfectly legal backchannel to Wikileaks.
Then he claimed that he had no idea that Wikileaks was about to drop the emails.
THEN Wikileaks said that they had announced the upcoming leak beforehand to their whole community, as they do with all leaks, and that Roger Stone must have heard it by that way.





If there is a perfectly innocent explanation how Roger Stone knew that Wikileaks was about to leak the DNC-emails, then why contradict the perfectly innocent explanation provided by Wikileaks and his own former statement?

Why destroy a perfect alibi?

[EveHammond13]

2. yes

[delisen]

3. Trump to Let Stone twist slowly in the wind?

Stone will recognize the phrase from his Nixon days and perhaps it will stoke his fear of prison and penury.