They hammered Hillary on the Emails and Benghazi bullshit for years

[edhopper]

to weaken her with the voters. Nothing was ever going to happen as a result of the investigations.

But impeaching Trump over legitimate criminal activity will only make him stronger?

Explain that to me?

[uponit7771]

1. K&R, Post Clinton impeachment false equivalency has been debunked. Dems lost house, senate and

... presidency.

Clinton's popularity grew but fell months after impeachment and Gore ran away from Clinton in part because people found Clinton dishonest even though people were willing to put up with that for Clinton because of the economy.

[edhopper]

2. As pertains to Hillary

we know the Comey bullshit did damage to her campaign. Yet full impeachment hearings wouldn't hurt Trump?

That is some seriously convoluted logic.

[Trumpocalypse]

3. Not impeaching Trump

but having him acquitted in the Senate will hand Trump a victory going in to the election.

[edhopper]

5. You really missed the point

what were the results of the Clinton investigations. Nothing, but it still hurt her.

All the shit that will come out will not help Trump because the GOP are cowards, it will hurt THEIR re-election.

[Trumpocalypse]

10. There can still be investigations

without impeachment.

[edhopper]

11. True

but if (when) they uncover high crimes, they must impeach.

[Trumpocalypse]

12. No they can censure

Impeachment without a conviction just hands Trump a victory.

[lame54]

13. I believed that BMR but now AMR...

I believe not impeaching leads to Trump's victory

Not saying vote tomorrow

Dig dig dig and build that mountain of evidence
But there has to be an endgame to the investigation
That is impeachment

To collect the evidence and then do nothing shows weakness(which the dems are known for(time to change that image)) and that may lead to no-shows at the polls

[edhopper]

15. This!

[Trumpocalypse]

16. Acquittal in the Senate

hands Trump a victory going in to the election. Censure is not doing nothing.

[edhopper]

14. I just don't see it that way

explain why the bullshit investigations, which had no results, hurt Hillary, but a trial in the Senate with all Trump's crimes laid bare, wouldn't hurt Trump?
Cowardly GOP or not.

[Trumpocalypse]

17. Because the Senate won't convict

Acquittal by the Senate gives Trump a victory. He’ll campaign claiming he was exonerated.

[edhopper]

19. Still doesn't explain why

the meaningless investigations against Hillary were effective.

Bullshit attacks on Hillary, bad for her.

Legitimate investigation on Trump good for him.

You don't see the incongruity.?

[Trumpocalypse]

20. Who ever said Trump

shouldn’t be investigated? Of course investigate him. But the investigations don’t need to end in impeachment.

[edhopper]

21. When high crimes are revealed

they should.

Do you doubt he has commited crimes?

[Trumpocalypse]

22. I don't know

That’s why we need Congressional investigations. Get it all out there and let the people decide.

[ooky]

18. No.

What on earth good would a censure be for this? I'd rather do nothing than wrap it all up with meaningless censure. Either impeach now or impeach/prosecute later, but no censure, no way.

[mopinko]

4. i said elsewhere- we could benghazi this shit, but w a new crime every day.

instead of days and days finding no crime.
i suspect our candidate will be the one who stands out in the hearings.

and honestly, if the senate refuses to convict, i think the people will be the ones to drain the swamp.

[edhopper]

6. That's what I'm saying!

[MiniMe]

7. This cabal has so much sh*t going on, it is hard to keep track of a single issue

IMHO, that is how he is getting away with so much.

[edhopper]

8. Bring as much of it to light as youu can

it will have an effect.

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

9. Can't...it's not explainable. Impeach Dolt-45... now!!

Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

[GulfCoast66]

23. It wasn't the Benghazi thing. They had been attacking her since 92.

Whitewater, Baking Cookies. And let’s not forget HillaryCare. Which would have been a far sight better than the ACA, which I support. But that is just nationally.

I lived in Arkansas from 76-84. She was the main attack against Bill even then. He actually lost re-election in 80 to the first Republican elected since reconstruction. Why? Because Hillary had not changed her name. She went by Hillary Rodman. Ok. Maybe that is an over simplification. Reagan won that year.

But she took his name, he was re-elected and the rest is history.

So 40 years of attacks aided and abetted by the MSM and that woman still won the popular vote

Rant over.