Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Subpoenas? We don't need no stinkin' subpoenas. We'll just flip you the bird and move on. (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Apr 2019 OP
The article ignores some important facts FBaggins Apr 2019 #1
. . . . . rendering the facts even more favorable to the Trumagats Stinky The Clown Apr 2019 #2
contempt of congress charges and inpeachment of the public figure like Barr can happen, let beachbum bob Apr 2019 #3
Good luck with that. Who enforces it? Stinky The Clown Apr 2019 #4

FBaggins

(26,760 posts)
1. The article ignores some important facts
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 12:02 AM
Apr 2019

MacCracken was a private citizen and destroyed evidence rather than turning it over. He wasn't part of a co-equal branch of government.

He also served a mere ten days in jail and never testified or turned over the evidence.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
3. contempt of congress charges and inpeachment of the public figure like Barr can happen, let
Tue Apr 30, 2019, 07:18 AM
Apr 2019

McConnel defend lawlessness....another anchor around GOP's 2020's neck

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Subpoenas? We don't need ...