Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat? They wasn't Mcgahn to change his testimony?
Trump wants Mcgahn to say that he was never told to fire Mueller! Boy, how obvious is tampering with a witness is that?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1459 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What? They wasn't Mcgahn to change his testimony? (Original Post)
imanamerican63
May 2019
OP
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)1. K&R, Trump is playing with words like Barr. They want people to think Remove doesn't mean fire
Ferrets are Cool
(21,106 posts)2. Come on...get with the times
Dictators don't worry about no STINKING LAWS.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,857 posts)3. ? "They wasn't Mcgahn to change his testimony?"
That sentence makes no sense to me. A word or two is wrong and I honestly can't quite figure out which one it is.
Sinistrous
(4,249 posts)4. Oh, good. I am not the only person who was confused
by that sentence.