Read Nadler's letter to McGahn. Nadler is pissed.

[Irishxs]

[Shrike47]

1. I would if there were a link.

[Haggis for Breakfast]

2. For those of us not able to access Twitter . . . .

could you please re-post this in another way ?

[BigmanPigman]

4. I don't have twitter but I saw this...

https://mobile.twitter.com/RepJerryNadler/status/1130586951562743809

It is Nadler's statement and below is the letter (small and hard to read). I can't find it posted on Google for some reason.

https://mobile.twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1130651755388243977/photo/1

[csziggy]

5. Here is the letter, from PBS

Their article about it: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-white-house-letter-directing-don-mcgahn-not-to-testify

The letter in PDF format: https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2019/05/PACLetterJN05.20.2019.pdf

[Glimmer of Hope]

6. Here is the pdf:

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/democrats.judiciary.house.gov/files/documents/Nadler%20Response%20letter%20to%20McGahn%205.20.19.pdf

[PSPS]

3. LOL. Yes, more paper cuts will magically make criminals obey the law. That'll do it. amirite?

[MontanaMama]

7. I hope that Jerry Nader fully intends

on arresting Mr McGahn if he does appear. Anything less make the letter ridiculous.

[CaptainTruth]

8. Did anyone catch that the DOJ referred to compelled testimony, not voluntary testimony?

The DOJ letter/opinion says McGahn is “absolutely immune from compelled congressional testimony," but it says nothing about voluntary testimony.

So apparently McGahn can testify voluntarily, he just can't be COMPELLED to testify, in the DOJ's opinion?

[Irishxs]

9. Sorry but I read it from another DU post. I didnt

have a link 🙁

[Irishxs]

10. These links are from doj. Letter I read WAS NADLERS

reply!! Check earlier posts.