General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Fake News Is Fake
The following comes from a blog, the updates to which I occasionally get by email. Emphasis, where added, is mine.
Donald Trump was quick to deploy a familiar Fake News soundbite on his trip to the UK this week. When questioned in a press conference about the crowds in London who were protesting against his visit, his response was that he hadnt seen the protests, and a lot of it is fake news.
It is increasingly obvious what Donald Trump means by the term Fake News it means news that he disagrees with. There are countless examples of there being a documented fact on the one side and a condemnation of said fact as Fake News on the other, but there was something about the brazen dismissal of the protests, while the sound of them was audible during the press conference, which put the issue into technicolour. Dismissing something as false where there is immediate evidence that is is happening at the same time provokes the wider question of what the term actually means.
So Donald Trump says Fake News when what he means is news that opposes his world view, provided by the Corrupt Media, which is another one of his favourite Twitter go-to phrases. But its clever because for much of his base, I suspect this nuance is lost. When he says something is Fake, they take that on face value, and his world view is reinforced. It explains why he has a particular zeal when condemning something which is genuinely incorrect, as this can reinforce his wider usage. That probably explains this weeks overdone attack on Bette Midler as a Washed up psycho after she admitted tweeting out a Trump quote which wasnt true. Seizing on instances of genuine Fake News allows the myth to be perpetuated that the instances of fakery are as widespread as the President would have us believe, and will add further belief to those who are prepared to take all of his utterances at face value.
And whatever daftness the President may spew out on Twitter, he will be well aware of how weaponising the term Fake News has allowed him to dismiss any or all attacks on him. He showed this week that he understands the value of words all too well. Speaking to Piers Morgan about climate change, he said: I believe theres a change in weather, and I think it changes both ways. Dont forget, it used to be called global warming, that wasnt working, then it was called climate change. Now its actually called extreme weather, because with extreme weather you cant miss. What he is doing here is attacking the notion of climate change by suggesting that people keep on changing how they refer to it so that they can get the message across, therefore suggesting that it isnt actually real because scientists keep having to sell it with a different word. He dismisses the science of climate change by focusing the conversation on the presentation of it, rather than the facts behind it. It is a very clever demonstration of how to use language to make your point, and affirms to me that he knows exactly what he is doing with the term Fake News.
More at https://wordability.net/2019/06/09/why-fake-news-is-fake/
underpants
(182,803 posts)Marking to read later
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)term Fake News. Things just don't happen in a vacuum,Focus group tested.
Volaris
(10,271 posts)and it wont be a thing his drooling rubes can hide from, either.