General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsParkland survivor David Hogg says he's been target of 7 'assassination attempts'
BY OWEN DAUGHERTY - 06/25/19 01:12 PM EDT
Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg said he has been the target of seven assassination attempts in the last year.
The vocal supporter of gun-control legislation detailed his experiences throughout the last 18 months as he went from regular high school student to one of the faces of the school safety movement in an interview with the Washington Post published Tuesday. He was not asked for further details about the threats.
Regarding the death threats and assassination attempts, Hogg said that killing him would be the stupidest thing they could do to try to end the movement.
Because that would make it even more successful in the end, Hogg told the Post. Because it would invigorate us and create f---ing change.
more
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/450242-parkland-survivor-david-hogg-says-hes-been-target-of-7
Gothmog
(145,481 posts)I am sadden by this news but not surprise. David Hogg is a valuable voice in the fight for gun control and I hope that he is okay
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)Ive never seen anything like it. Hes such a courageous young man.
world wide wally
(21,751 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)It's a garbage site frequented by disgusting people. I'm not going to dare to read the comments in that link.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)With the quote that was the ONLY thing The Hill picked up on to sensationalize:
In the past year, there have been seven assassination attempts.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/parklands-david-hogg-children-having-to-go-through-active-shooter-drills-is-not-what-freedom-looks-like-to-me/2019/06/24/ee5c8982-8182-11e9-bce7-40b4105f7ca0_story.html?utm_term=.0ae8f0f38e72
While some have problems seeing WP or NYT articles, I would rather see them linked than site such as The Hill or RawStory.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)You know damn well I'm not talking about you. Don't even go there.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)one so, I'm not offering you one.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)I said the site was frequented by disgusting people. I didn't say it was only frequented by disgusting people. Not everything is about you. Geez.
I spent about an hour there last night in an article about E. Jean Carroll and these were some of the highlights in the comments sections.
1) About a thousand comments about Carroll being a "dog" and too ugly to rape.
2) One asshole called Michelle Obama a "gorilla" while another called her "Michael" (a long running "joke" about her actually being a man).
And you want to tell me that this site isn't full of scum? Yeah right.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)loaded with assinine comments, e.g., the Washington Post and the Boston Globe. If you're going to allow the folks from the lower end of the gene pool impact/control what you read and/or don't read...well...by all means go for it. You should probably put me on ignore so you do not have to read any other articles from The Hill which I may or may not post.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)For one thing, their comment sections actually have competent moderators who don't allow people to post racist, sexist, and homophobic garbage.
But I think the InfoWar/Breitbart/whoever crowd is just drawn to sites like The Hill for whatever reason. The idiots who post on the WP are in the minority. It's mostly full of people who despise Trump. With The Hill, the nuts seem to outnumber the sane people.
Yahoo's comment sections are the same way. It's why I stopped going there as well.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)you are correct, they have a superb moderating system. Disqus, on the other hand, is just a gutter service; I have more Disqus members on "block" than any other service. I don't even bother reading the comments at the Hill or Mediaite any more. Disqus is loaded with bots too, American and Russian.
JI7
(89,260 posts)how much hatred he gets.
Gothmog
(145,481 posts)malaise
(269,144 posts)Stay safe young man - you're a hero
Gothmog
(145,481 posts)Marengo
(3,477 posts)sarisataka
(18,733 posts)I would have expected some news reports about "assassination attempts" against such a high profile person.
aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)sarisataka
(18,733 posts)At least police reports filed
Initech
(100,097 posts)And once was the subject of "swatting" where a bomb threat was called to his house and the swat team had to show up. We're dealing with some scary folks out there.
sarisataka
(18,733 posts)Who have been making many threats however I would not call any of those assassination attempts.
Initech
(100,097 posts)Attempted murder? Most definitely.
Attempted assassination? No.
sarisataka
(18,733 posts)Is definitely a threat. If a bomb is actually found I would not split hairs over calling it assassination or murder.
However to call it an attempt, I believe there must actually be an attempt, not just a threat.
Initech
(100,097 posts)I think this would clarify it:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/13/us/barriss-swatting-wichita.html
sarisataka
(18,733 posts)A very dangerous threat. It is quite a popular recommendation around here for many unpopular types. Now many of those calls to dox someone are towards reprehensible people but is DU really calling for the murder of them?
If not, then it is hypocritical to condemn it when used again a person DU supports. If it is a tacit call for murder, then maybe we are no different.
From what you posted, the swat team was there because of the bomb threat. Very different than the swating of the article.
Initech
(100,097 posts)Every time it's brought up, I'm always against it. Because it can and could be used against you, me, or any other member of this forum. Just as much as you can use it against any other member of any other forum.
If you are doxxed, people can find out anything about you, your friends and loved ones. It's basically the internet equivalent of putting a target on your back or walking around with a "kick me" sign taped to your back. It's never a good idea no matter which side is doing it to who.
As far as swatting goes, the entire intent of the practice is to get someone in the crosshairs of police weapons, like in the story that I linked to. If that's attempted murder than what is?
sarisataka
(18,733 posts)I am against it in all cases. There have been innocent victims who were misidentified in several instances.
As for the swat team, I believe if they are called to a house because there is a threat someone has placed a bomb, they will see the people there as victims to be protected. If the call is that someone is making bombs they will go in with a very different mindset. Maybe I am being too nuanced but I would say the former is a threat while the latter I would agree is attempted murder.
Initech
(100,097 posts)The concept of swatting originated in online gaming circles. The idea is to fake a bomb threat or anything that will get the attention of police, and it often results in the person getting murdered by the police, or at the very least that person will wind up in the crosshairs of police weapons until the police realize that the threat called in was a prank. It's truly an awful concept and it needs to end. It is attempted murder in my book.
Elmer1007
(40 posts)Agreed, 7 assassination attempts would make national news, threats i can see but not actual assassination attempts
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)Initech
(100,097 posts)If you're that paranoid of that possibility happening to you, you absolutely should not under any circumstances own a gun.
former9thward
(32,064 posts)So seven "assassination attempts" and not a single detail, not a single police report. ... Fine reporting....