General Discussion

demmiblue

(36,845 posts) Thu Jun 27, 2019, 10:47 AM Jun 2019

The Supreme Court rules against the Trump Administration on the census question by a 5-4 majority.

Link to tweet

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Supreme Court rules against the Trump Administration on the census question by a 5-4 majority. (Original Post) demmiblue Jun 2019 OP

Wow California_Republic Jun 2019 #1

Well, well. Does one good turn erase a very bad one? Nt Ninga Jun 2019 #2

Excellent! elleng Jun 2019 #3

Great news! Takket Jun 2019 #4

Scary the trump wing 4 could go approve the obvious discrimination efforts empedocles Jun 2019 #5

Is that lower court still going to reopen the case then? TlalocW Jun 2019 #6

While they rejected the question here, he wrote that Commerce is free Calista241 Jun 2019 #7

California_Republic

(1,826 posts)

1. Wow

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2019, 10:49 AM

Jun 2019

Ninga

(8,275 posts)

2. Well, well. Does one good turn erase a very bad one? Nt

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2019, 10:50 AM

Jun 2019

elleng

(130,895 posts)

3. Excellent!

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2019, 10:50 AM

Jun 2019

Takket

(21,563 posts)

4. Great news!

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2019, 10:51 AM

Jun 2019

empedocles

(15,751 posts)

5. Scary the trump wing 4 could go approve the obvious discrimination efforts

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2019, 10:52 AM

Jun 2019

TlalocW

(15,381 posts)

6. Is that lower court still going to reopen the case then?

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2019, 10:53 AM

Jun 2019

Or is the point moot? Can the lower court put extra hurt on the Trumpers?

TlalocW

Calista241

(5,586 posts)

7. While they rejected the question here, he wrote that Commerce is free

Reply to demmiblue (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2019, 11:02 AM

Jun 2019

Roberts wrote: “Relatedly, a court may not set aside an agency’s policy making decision solely because it might have been influenced by political considerations or prompted by an Administration’s priorities.”

Basically, this case is not settled, and the question could be on the census if the Dept of Commerce does some more work.

Reply to this discussion