Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,956 posts)
Fri Jun 28, 2019, 07:04 PM Jun 2019

4 Senate Republicans joined with Democrats to rein in Trump on Iran

Senate Republicans were put on the spot this week about whether they believe the president should be required to consult Congress before ordering a strike against Iran. It’s clear, from the outcome of a Friday vote, that most of them don’t.

Senators this week voted on a measure that would make it mandatory for the White House to obtain congressional approval in order to move forward with military action against Iran. The majority of Republicans opposed it, though Sens. Rand Paul (KY), Mike Lee (UT), Susan Collins (ME), and Jerry Moran (KS) joined with Democrats to support it. The measure, which needed 60 votes to pass, wound up failing, with 50 votes in favor and 40 votes against (10 other lawmakers had already skipped town for recess).

Echoing a position that some Republicans have expressed openly in this past, Friday’s vote confirmed that the majority of Senate Republicans aren’t interested in checking the president when it comes to war powers, despite a vote earlier this year that indicated some breaks on this subject. In the context of rising tensions with Iran, this position has Democrats incredibly concerned.

The amendment, if passed, would have curbed the president’s ability to advance a strike on his own. Every president since George W. Bush has been relying on a 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, approved by Congress in the days after 9/11 to justify a variety of conflicts in the Middle East. Lately, there’s been a movement to rein in the president’s power on this front — particularly when it comes to potential conflict with Iran. The amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, an annual bill that allocates funds for the Department of Defense, was such an attempt. Trump, if he decided to pursue a conflict with Iran, would likely continue to rely on

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/4-senate-republicans-joined-with-democrats-to-rein-in-trump-on-iran/ar-AADzHvC?li=BBnb7Kz

What did Iran have to do with 9/11? Saudi Arabia on the other hand....

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
4 Senate Republicans joined with Democrats to rein in Trump on Iran (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2019 OP
fantastic grammar by whoever wrote the headline Takket Jun 2019 #1

Takket

(21,563 posts)
1. fantastic grammar by whoever wrote the headline
Fri Jun 28, 2019, 07:15 PM
Jun 2019

How exactly was drumpf "reined in" if the measure failed to pass?

Better headline: 4 rethugs join Dems in failed attempt to rein in drumpf on Iran

and yes, those are the words I'd use LOL

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»4 Senate Republicans join...