Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drray23

(7,627 posts)
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 04:25 PM Jul 2019

Who would have standing to refer to the international court of human rights ?

I know the Trump administration will not do anything if their justice department headed by Barr gets lawsuits regarding the treatment of migrants at the border.
I am wondering if some entity would have standing to sue them in an international court of human rights ?

Having international arrest warrants issued for the people that are actively enabling these horrors ( head of cbp, local border patrol chiefs of these centers, etc.. ) may be effective.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who would have standing to refer to the international court of human rights ? (Original Post) drray23 Jul 2019 OP
There is no International Court of Human Rights. former9thward Jul 2019 #1
Yes i was thinking about the icc drray23 Jul 2019 #2
The World Court in the Hague MFM008 Jul 2019 #3
It has to be a member body. former9thward Jul 2019 #6
It says MFM008 Jul 2019 #8
Who in the US has the UN ever referred? former9thward Jul 2019 #10
UN Human Rights Council???? FirstLight Jul 2019 #4
we should call the unhcr and the red cross in, mopinko Jul 2019 #5
The rest of the planet malaise Jul 2019 #7
I was in Spain for two weeks last month, they thought we took care of it. Some folk from the UK ... uponit7771 Jul 2019 #9

former9thward

(31,989 posts)
1. There is no International Court of Human Rights.
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 04:34 PM
Jul 2019

If you are thinking of the International Criminal Court the U.S. has never agreed to join it and it has no jurisdiction in the U.S.

drray23

(7,627 posts)
2. Yes i was thinking about the icc
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 04:42 PM
Jul 2019

Go figure, we of course are not signatories... I dont suppose there is any entity that could issue arrest warrants based on human right violations in the us ? Besides our own court system ? We are not signatories of anything that would compel us to respect human rights ?

MFM008

(19,806 posts)
3. The World Court in the Hague
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 04:42 PM
Jul 2019

While the US might ignore an indictment
the rest of the world would have to treat someone like a war criminal
Including arrest outside of the US borders.

former9thward

(31,989 posts)
6. It has to be a member body.
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 06:05 PM
Jul 2019

1) The subject matter they consider is not the subject matter of the OP and 2) it has to be a legal authority of a member body that initiates action. Not just "anyone" can do it. That is why there is a continuing myth that Bush, etc can't travel beyond the borders. That is false and they can and have. No member body of the ICC has ever filed a complaint against Bush, etc.

MFM008

(19,806 posts)
8. It says
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 08:14 PM
Jul 2019

The Court in the Hague can take prosecution referrals from the Untied Nations.
Why should a criminal feel safe because of borders?

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
9. I was in Spain for two weeks last month, they thought we took care of it. Some folk from the UK ...
Tue Jul 2, 2019, 08:22 PM
Jul 2019

... were talking about it but for the most part it was back paged news because it was taken care of.

I would LOVE to see what it's like now

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who would have standing t...