Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Seth Abramson: 'Aiding and abetting' a foreign adversary who attacks us. WTF is that? Not treason? (Original Post) triron Jul 2019 OP
It's not treason in the legal sense of the word because The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2019 #1
it's treason by the Constitution Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2019 #2
Agree. triron Jul 2019 #4
Maybe so but that interpretation is obsolete imo. We will never be in a 'declared war' again. triron Jul 2019 #3
It's the law until the courts or Congress decide otherwise. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2019 #5
wish a lawyer admitted before SCOTUS would weigh in Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2019 #6
Good citation though. triron Jul 2019 #7
From the Con asked Russia to find Hillary's emails malaise Jul 2019 #8
See what Seth Abramson has to say below. triron Jul 2019 #10
Seth later adds this: triron Jul 2019 #9
This malaise Jul 2019 #11
This is treason because Russia is an adversay and Russia attacked us. That's like triron Jul 2019 #12
ITTMFA Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2019 #14
It is treason. Kid Berwyn Jul 2019 #13

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,706 posts)
1. It's not treason in the legal sense of the word because
Wed Jul 24, 2019, 10:28 PM
Jul 2019

treason, as defined by the law and interpreted by the courts, consists of aiding and abetting an enemy in a declared war. It's traitorous, of course, but it's not indictable treason.

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,347 posts)
2. it's treason by the Constitution
Wed Jul 24, 2019, 10:32 PM
Jul 2019

The problem is that the only law declaring punishment for treason includes a definition of enemy effectively as you said.

So, Trump has committed treason, but Congress never got around to defining a punishment for treason with a hostile power not engaged in acts governed by the rules of war.

triron

(22,003 posts)
3. Maybe so but that interpretation is obsolete imo. We will never be in a 'declared war' again.
Wed Jul 24, 2019, 10:34 PM
Jul 2019

Russia attacked us at a most fundamental level. Putin will destroy us without firing a shot if
we don't wake up.

malaise

(269,004 posts)
11. This
Thu Jul 25, 2019, 10:25 AM
Jul 2019

6/ Media is correctly noting that Mueller went beyond the question he was asked only *once* today: and it was *on that question* that I'm now saying he leveled a charge of aiding and abetting (a *serious* federal crime) against the President. We need to start discussing this now.

triron

(22,003 posts)
12. This is treason because Russia is an adversay and Russia attacked us. That's like
Thu Jul 25, 2019, 10:56 AM
Jul 2019

Roosevelt inviting (and praising) Japan to attack mainland U.S. after Pearl Harbor.
Treason needs to be updated to modern era. Putin doesn't have to fire a shot to defeat us.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seth Abramson: 'Aiding a...