Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bluestarone

(16,926 posts) Thu Sep 5, 2019, 02:52 PM Sep 2019

3

Is it possible that the House could ask SC

To reconsider the Ruling on tRUMPS emergency wall money?

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is it possible that the House could ask SC (Original Post) bluestarone Sep 2019 OP

The Court hasn't ruled yet StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #1

It isn't even at SCOTUS and they aren't party to the suit FBaggins Sep 2019 #2

TY could the House could request speedy decision? bluestarone Sep 2019 #3

Probably not StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #4

Since the SC has refused to stop that spending while the suit proceeds former9thward Sep 2019 #5

More than likely your right. bluestarone Sep 2019 #6

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)

1. The Court hasn't ruled yet

Reply to bluestarone (Original post)

Thu Sep 5, 2019, 02:56 PM

Sep 2019

It only refused to block the spending while the case proceeds. The case is still before the Court.

FBaggins

(26,731 posts)

2. It isn't even at SCOTUS and they aren't party to the suit

Reply to StarfishSaver (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 5, 2019, 03:11 PM

Sep 2019

IIRC it's the Sierra Club and it's at the 9th Cir.

The problem they'll run in to is that SCOTUS hinted that Sierra Club has no course of action.

bluestarone

(16,926 posts)

3. TY could the House could request speedy decision?

Reply to StarfishSaver (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 5, 2019, 03:11 PM

Sep 2019

Think they will when they return?

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)

4. Probably not

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #3)

Thu Sep 5, 2019, 04:08 PM

Sep 2019

They're not party to the suit, so they don't have any standing. They can weigh in on the merits of the case through in amicus brief, but that wouldn't have anything to do with pushing for a speedier decision.

former9thward

(31,997 posts)

5. Since the SC has refused to stop that spending while the suit proceeds

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #3)

Thu Sep 5, 2019, 06:56 PM

Sep 2019

it is a good indication you will not like the results of a speedy decision.

bluestarone

(16,926 posts)

6. More than likely your right.

Reply to former9thward (Reply #5)

Thu Sep 5, 2019, 07:46 PM

Sep 2019

I can't believe it BUT your right i'm sure. How the SC allows this is beyond my wildest dreams

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it possible that the H...