Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 11:54 AM Sep 2012

How does Cutting Taxes for the Rich reduce the National Debt?

Every republican, at any level, should be asked this question in this simple form.

Even their best spokespeople will draw a blank.

In 1985 or even 1995 they could have answered this question by claiming (falsely) that the increased growth caused by not taxing the rich would generate more than enough new taxable activity to offset the seeming loss in revenue and the the government would take in more money.

But in 2012 nobody can say that with a straight face. It is rare for even the loopiest RWer to claim that tax cuts increase revenue, and increasing revenue is viewed as a bad thing by the modern Republican party.

So there is no longer any argument for the tax cuts other than that taxing the rich at the same effective rate as the poor would e class warfare. But it is far from obvious that avoidance of class warfare reduces the national debt.

So it is a question to be asked.

How does Cutting Taxes for the Rich reduce the National Debt?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How does Cutting Taxes for the Rich reduce the National Debt? (Original Post) cthulu2016 Sep 2012 OP
It doesn't, and they fucking know it. Autumn Sep 2012 #1
It calls the confidence fairy. dawg Sep 2012 #2
'growth'! pansypoo53219 Sep 2012 #3
The same way funneling money to rich people helps poor people. bemildred Sep 2012 #4
That is so last century.... Wounded Bear Sep 2012 #5
They believe that reducing taxes spurs economic growth and that the end result is Tennessee Gal Sep 2012 #6
I doesn't, It's supposed to create jobs. You know, giving the ultra-Wealthy a little more bling. Rectangle Sep 2012 #7
Magic! leeroysphitz Sep 2012 #8

dawg

(10,624 posts)
2. It calls the confidence fairy.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:30 PM
Sep 2012

Then the confidence fairy summons the invisible hand, which in turn stimulates the job creators, who create so many jobs that there are enough new workers that they pay enough extra payroll taxes and income taxes to reduce the deficit.

Sound ridiculous to you? Well, then you just might be a liberal.

Wounded Bear

(58,648 posts)
5. That is so last century....
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:39 PM
Sep 2012

They've moved on to a new excuse. I don't know what it is off the top of my head, but I'm sure it's a good one.

Tennessee Gal

(6,160 posts)
6. They believe that reducing taxes spurs economic growth and that the end result is
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:40 PM
Sep 2012

an increase in tax revenue. However, that rarely happens.

Do Tax Cuts Ever Increase Government Revenues?
Three historical examples of tax cuts paying for themselves, and how they undercut the GOP claim that tax cuts always do that.

http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2011/06/do_tax_cuts_ever_increase_government_revenues.html

Tax Cuts Don't Boost Revenues

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1692027,00.html

Rectangle

(667 posts)
7. I doesn't, It's supposed to create jobs. You know, giving the ultra-Wealthy a little more bling.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:48 PM
Sep 2012

The truth is, it just makes the ultra-wealthy----wealthier.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How does Cutting Taxes fo...