Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madokie

(51,076 posts)
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 05:42 PM Sep 2012

This one is do or die

Talking to an old and dear friend yesterday and he said that this election has him more scared, yes he said that word, than any of the others since he was old enough to remember and that memory started with the Kennedy/nixon election. I told him I agree with that whole heartedly. Our country as we know it today rides on this election. We lose this one and we'll never get our democracy back, in our lifetimes and possibly ever.



23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This one is do or die (Original Post) madokie Sep 2012 OP
I do not deny that Rmoney/Ryan would be a disaster. I would prefer that Team Democrat would Vincardog Sep 2012 #1
One person can't change that either madokie Sep 2012 #2
"We are the ones we've been waiting for" YES WE CAN!! lunatica Sep 2012 #5
Thank you madokie Sep 2012 #7
I would prefer he were leading in a more liberal direction. He could end the war on MM Vincardog Sep 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #20
Spot on - and slightly to one side daeron Sep 2012 #21
I agree that "Washington listens to businessmen" I don't agree that they are fooled into it. Vincardog Sep 2012 #23
I'm looking at it slightly differently a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #3
By 2024 we very well may be toast madokie Sep 2012 #4
Politics aside, we may very well become toast if we don't restore the concept of lumpy Sep 2012 #12
That might be why many ofthe Makers I know a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #18
I somewhat agree liberal_at_heart Sep 2012 #10
liberal at heart... a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #14
People on the right are saying the same thing, except the names are switched. ZombieHorde Sep 2012 #6
Yeah, making fun of the, but it's totally right on! gateley Sep 2012 #11
"Our country as we know it today rides on this election." n/t ProfessionalLeftist Sep 2012 #9
I think the early fight back against RETHUG attempts to suppress votes malaise Sep 2012 #13
Those machines worry me madokie Sep 2012 #15
They all are. surrealAmerican Sep 2012 #16
I think not so much as this one madokie Sep 2012 #17
Goldwater vs LBJ was probably the most important in that time frame andym Sep 2012 #19
We're in more trouble than that. The Doctor. Sep 2012 #22

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
1. I do not deny that Rmoney/Ryan would be a disaster. I would prefer that Team Democrat would
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 05:48 PM
Sep 2012

offer real changes to the fundamental problems facing us.

The most significant problem is the institutionalized Capitalism driving "our" world.
As long as we allow Capital supremacy we will always end up in this situation where people are subjugated to money.

Governments are instituted by PEOPLE to serve PEOPLE.

They are corrupted by MONEY to serve the RICH.

This election is not going to change this fundamental fact.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
2. One person can't change that either
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 05:51 PM
Sep 2012

I remember well what President Obama said early on, The change we seek is us, something to that effect. Wish my old addled mind could remember the quote exactly but I can't and he was spot on when he made it. Maybe someone can help me out here with this.
Peace

madokie

(51,076 posts)
7. Thank you
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 05:58 PM
Sep 2012

I was kinda sorta on the right track but not real close.
I love this President like no other before him, he is special

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
8. I would prefer he were leading in a more liberal direction. He could end the war on MM
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 05:58 PM
Sep 2012

with the stroke of a pen.

Response to Vincardog (Reply #8)

daeron

(28 posts)
21. Spot on - and slightly to one side
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 09:49 PM
Sep 2012

It is not Capitalism that is the problem,
it is that Washington listens to businessmen who are concealing their business relations and vested interests in the subjects that they are advising the government about.

That's why the Founding fathers warned of allowing shop-keepers into power, and why Republican President Eisenhower warned of the undue influence sought & unsought of a military industrial complex of corporations and people seeking to manipulate US policies to their own ends..

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
23. I agree that "Washington listens to businessmen" I don't agree that they are fooled into it.
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 01:51 PM
Sep 2012

Our government has been taken over by " corporations and people seeking to manipulate US policies to their own ends."
The Bush crime family has made it their business model for 100 years and 3 generations now.

 

a geek named Bob

(2,715 posts)
3. I'm looking at it slightly differently
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 05:53 PM
Sep 2012

As the GOP is a bunch of scared old white guys, they have - if you'll pardon the expression - a built in deadline. By 2024, a number of sources are forecasting Texas to go blue. If Florida stays purple, California stays blue, and then so does Texas...

That's 122 Electoral votes, right off the bat. Add in Oregon, Washington, and New York State, and you're up to 170. That's a fair shout to the presidency.

What I'm worried about, is the continuing fall of education, infrastructure, broadcast culture, and fact checking. I know of Maker enclaves that are pretty much prepping for a ahem "general decline."

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
12. Politics aside, we may very well become toast if we don't restore the concept of
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 06:31 PM
Sep 2012

Common Decency. That innate best part of humanity that still dwells within us body and soul. We have become a nation that has bowed down to The Seven Deadly Sins. We have been weak in accepting all that the media and commercial enticements sling at us.

 

a geek named Bob

(2,715 posts)
18. That might be why many ofthe Makers I know
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 07:09 PM
Sep 2012

are getting together.

They are hoping to either keep things running at least a little longer. Or picking up the pieces, when it goes bad.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
10. I somewhat agree
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 06:00 PM
Sep 2012

yes the demographics will change and therefore their insistence to rely entirely on the white vote will diminish, but the changing demographics will not change the fact that the 1% now own this country.

 

a geek named Bob

(2,715 posts)
14. liberal at heart...
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 06:35 PM
Sep 2012

We can take away that ownership pretty much given 5 years.

1.) local power and fuel creation
2.) local manufacturing
3.) local food production
4.) linked local currencies, with social progress clauses

gateley

(62,683 posts)
11. Yeah, making fun of the, but it's totally right on!
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 06:03 PM
Sep 2012

Great piece -- thanks for linking, I missed it.

malaise

(268,998 posts)
13. I think the early fight back against RETHUG attempts to suppress votes
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 06:35 PM
Sep 2012

by civil society groups and Democrats is working. Once they cannopt steal the elections, ReTHUGs will lose.

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
16. They all are.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 06:46 PM
Sep 2012

It's discouraging to realize that every election is too important to just let it slide, but there is always the risk that any one narrow loss could ruin our future irreparably.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
17. I think not so much as this one
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 06:50 PM
Sep 2012

so much of the ground work is already in place, all that is needed is another pResident like bush the lessor and the 1%'rs will truly have us by the short hairs. Rmoney/LyinRyan = Bush/cheney

andym

(5,443 posts)
19. Goldwater vs LBJ was probably the most important in that time frame
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 08:21 PM
Sep 2012

If Goldwater, then no
Medicare, Medicaid, the Civil Rights Act of 1968 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965

However, given the extreme positions of Romney's GOP, they are mighty dangerous.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This one is do or die