Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:05 PM Sep 2012

Julian Assange: UK rejects death penalty claim

Claims Wikileaks founder Julian Assange could face the death penalty in the US are "without foundation", Foreign Secretary William Hague has indicated ...

"The suggestion that Mr Assange's human rights would be put at risk by the possibility of onward extradition from Sweden to a third country is also without foundation...

"In practice, this means that the United Kingdom could only consent to Mr Assange's onward extradition from Sweden to a third country if satisfied that extradition would be compatible with his human rights, and that there was no prospect of a death sentence being imposed or carried out" ...

The foreign secretary said there had been seven formal discussions as well as many other conversations and written exchanges with Ecuador in an attempt to reach an acceptable resolution ...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/19466791

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

NewYorkers

(13 posts)
1. Hacking is Act of War
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:06 PM
Sep 2012

The Pentagon’s newest policy grants the US military the ability to respond to a cyber attack on government networks with physical force – equating hacking to an act of war.

http://rt.com/usa/news/pentagon-war-cyber-attacks/

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
9. Why would anyone regard Russia Today as an authoritative source on US law and policy?
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:55 PM
Sep 2012

Russia Today is state-owned media: it reflects the foreign policy propaganda of its owner

Response to NewYorkers (Reply #1)

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
2. The president claims the authority to execute anybody without judicial review.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:11 PM
Sep 2012

[link:http://www.constitutioncampaign.org/blog/?p=6657|
It he can kill US Citizens why couldn't he kill a filthy Aussie publisher of inconvenient facts ?

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
3. Sweden's a US partner in illegal CIA rendition actions, the UK is guilty of war crimes
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:15 PM
Sep 2012

Nobody believes them. Those two countries have shown they don't give a shit about international law.

Trotting out this argument AGAIN S4P? Poor dear having to resort to recycling old stuff.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
10. And they could have done that 2 years ago instead of waiting all this time.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:56 PM
Sep 2012

Either the conspirators are evil masterminds or they are incompetent. Either way doesn't bode well for those who think Assange is under penalty of death.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
14. Interesting that you would take the word of a British minister when our own government is mum
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 07:32 PM
Sep 2012

when it comes to the intent of the Wikileaks and Assange Grand Jury.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Julian Assange: UK reject...