General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo if Trump's tax case goes to the Supremes, how will they vote?
I'm thinking he loses. I think it will be at least 5-4 and maybe better. Its John Roberts' court and I think he's concerned about his rep in history. He will do the right thing and uphold the lower court. I actually think BooferBeerBoy will vote against him so as to demonstrate independence. Not as sure about Gorsuch.
I think Slappy will side with MalevolentMango. Not sure about anyone else.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,773 posts)The reasoning and authority underlying the Court of Appeals' opinion are really solid; the Supremes would have to overturn an awful lot of established law to decide differently. And I hope Roberts assigns Kavanaugh to write the opinion because it would make Fat Nixon's head explode. There would be an epic Twitter fit in which he threatens to fire the whole Supreme Court (except maybe for Thomas), which of course he can't do. Or at least he will accuse them of being compromised Democrats in the employ of the Deep State, George Soros and/or Ukraine.
walkingman
(7,635 posts)LonePirate
(13,427 posts)I have a tough time believing Kav would side against 45 even with all of the precedents suggesting 45 will lose.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,773 posts)lifetime appointments of justices are in most respects a good thing, meaning Kavanaugh isn't beholden to him. Like Gorsuch, he is an originalist like Scalia was, which suggests that he is more likely rather than less to follow the precedents cited by the 2nd Circuit.
sacto95834
(393 posts)is too important for Roberts to assign if it affirms the Appeals Court. He will write for the majority; thus assuring his name is remembered for a very important case sure to make the Constitutional Law text books.
However I do not see case being unanimous. For sure Alito and probably Thomas will dissent. Not sure what the two Trump appointees will do.
Raster
(20,998 posts)...Allowing the Appeals Court ruling to stand.
Sneederbunk
(14,295 posts)leftieNanner
(15,135 posts)This particular court appeal goes to RBG's office for consideration. Besides, it's a state matter, not federal. Even though The Orange One makes a Federal Case out of Everything!
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,773 posts)and four justices have to vote to hear the case. The 2nd Circuit said it is subject to federal jurisdiction - they didn't buy the abstention argument.
leftieNanner
(15,135 posts)Thanks for that explanation.
Johonny
(20,861 posts)flotsam
(3,268 posts)If they grant Cert they have 2 possible outcomes either of which is bad for them-their actual choices are:
A. Rule against trump and endure his wrath.
B.Rule he is in fact above all law.
Or instead:
C.Accept the SDNY issued a clear and narrow ruling that introduces no questions of law.
Jeepers-one option seems to cause them no problem.
rampartc
(5,425 posts)and future presidents become entirely above the law, for as long as they can sieze (by any means) and hold power.
obviously (by federalist society standards) the original intent of the founders was an unchecked unitary executive with compliant legislature and rubber stamp courts.
feseralist society : Gorsuch, Alito, Roberts, Clarence Thomas
trump loyalist : kavanaugh
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,773 posts)There's a pretty good chance the Supremes won't even hear the case - the 2nd Circuit drafted their opinion so carefully and narrowly that I think they did it on purpose so certiorari wouldn't be granted.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Snackshack
(2,541 posts)Rules in favor of trump then any lingering doubt about the court still being an unbiased arbiter of justice will be gone and Roberts will go down in history as the Chief Justice who turned the Supreme Court into a political arm of the GOP. Barr has already done this to the DOJ. Hopefully Roberts does not do this to the court.
My guess is that they refuse to hear the case and leave the appellate courts ruling in place.
My hope is that they hear the case and rule against trump unanimously to send a strong signal that they are not an extension of the GOP and trump has to turn over the tax docs.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)Then again, the Trump majority find ways to rule irrationally all the time.
US V Nixon was a unanimous verdict-- against Nixon, who had appointed several of them. But it's a different time.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,633 posts)For Trump's taxes and accountant's records that is Pending appeal by House Intelligence and Finance committees. If that case goes to SCOTUS, I find it hard to conceive the court would rule that the Intelligence committee has no authority to investigate the president to determine if he is a foreign asset, especially during an impeach,net inquiry.
An appeals ruling on the House case by a lower court is expected this month- it could be the game changer.