General Discussion

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts) Wed Dec 4, 2019, 12:08 PM Dec 2019

Wow, and we were told this hearing would just be a dry academic discussion!

How wrong was that. This hearing is fascinating, and absolutely damming for Idiot!

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wow, and we were told this hearing would just be a dry academic discussion! (Original Post) MoonRiver Dec 2019 OP

The people who told you that didn't want you to watch or listen gratuitous Dec 2019 #1

Can't disagree with that. MoonRiver Dec 2019 #2

Yeah, you seldom hear a distinguished law professor bring up his dog... Wounded Bear Dec 2019 #3

Chuck Todd just got two scoops of pizazz Blue Owl Dec 2019 #4

It was more interesting than the impeachment hearings JonLP24 Dec 2019 #5

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)

1. The people who told you that didn't want you to watch or listen

Reply to MoonRiver (Original post)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 12:13 PM

Dec 2019

Why some opinionators wouldn't want people to tune in to the hearings is a matter best left to conjecture, lest I start name-calling and being uncivil.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)

2. Can't disagree with that.

Reply to gratuitous (Reply #1)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 12:16 PM

Dec 2019

Wounded Bear

(58,648 posts)

3. Yeah, you seldom hear a distinguished law professor bring up his dog...

Reply to MoonRiver (Original post)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 12:21 PM

Dec 2019

Blue Owl

(50,356 posts)

4. Chuck Todd just got two scoops of pizazz

Reply to MoonRiver (Original post)

Thu Dec 5, 2019, 01:24 AM

Dec 2019

n/t

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)

5. It was more interesting than the impeachment hearings

Reply to MoonRiver (Original post)

Thu Dec 5, 2019, 01:26 AM

Dec 2019

I liked how they broke things down in ways I could understand.

Reply to this discussion