General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould someone please explain what was wrong with Jeremy Corbyn?
Last edited Fri Dec 13, 2019, 10:49 PM - Edit history (1)
I've read several threads about the past British election and why the conservatives won by such a large amount. As someone from the US, I was having trouble discerning between fact, opinion, and sarcasm (sarcasm doesn't work if you're truly ignorant).
Was Corbyn really too liberal for the British people or was he just unlikeable? Why?
Do that many people in Great Britain really want to leave the EU? I thought it more evenly split.
Thank you!
Leith
(7,809 posts)I don't know the details, but if it's true, he's a fuckin' idiot and should step down.
tenderfoot
(8,426 posts)coupled with the obvious smear campaign against him by the Murdoch controlled British media.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)He supported Hamas and Hezbollah.
He stood by a "blood libel cleric"
https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/jeremy-corbyn-blamed-zionist-lobby-for-blood-libel-cleric-raed-salah-s-expulsion-from-the-uk-1.482455
He was a present at a ceremony honoring the Munich terrorists
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-munich-attack-wreaths-palestinian-terrorists-antisemitism-a8489731.html
Oh yes there were 70 whistle blowers from within the Labour Party
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/election-2019-70-officials-blow-whistle-on-labour-over-antisemitism-h390f5n5x
The party is being investigated by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.
tenderfoot
(8,426 posts)eom
nycbos
(6,034 posts)He attended a ceremony honoring the terrorists who committed massacre.
Those are facts.
And you dismissing me as a right winger shows how acceptable antisemitism is on the left.
It is a cause that unites the far right and the far left.
Jews get faux support from both sides.
When the attack is a Neo-Nazi like Pittsburgh we get "sympathy" from you people. When the attackers is a Muslim we "sympathy" from the MAGA assholes.
I for one see though all the BS.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)not "The Left" or "how acceptable anti-Semitism is on the Left", which
is a lie. The fact of that should be obvious given that the vast majority of American Jews (75%} are reliable Democratic voters.
Doodley
(9,088 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)I just don't think he's representative of "The Left, at least not in this country.
Doodley
(9,088 posts)want to keep healthcare for all, free at the point of use. Democrats can't even agree on a if or how they want to achieve that. The Conservatives want to keep paid maternity leave. They believe in a woman's right to choose. They believe in climate change and want to be carbon neutral by 2050. In some ways, they are more to the left. In others (immigration control, police) they are more authoritarian, but not in an outright racist way we see in the Trump administration.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)what that has to do with me, anti-Semitism, Jeremy Corbyn, or my comment.
Doodley
(9,088 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)dware
(12,369 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Was it his anti-semitism that was the turnoff for the voters? Nice to think so if it was, then again, maybe that was not their problem with him.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)Antisemitism played a role, Brexit played a role. It will take awhile to figure out all the reasons.
Raster
(20,998 posts)...it makes them someone that is possibly/probably anti-Netanyahu. Unfortunately, Netanyahu and persons close to Netanyahu have been promoting the disgraceful meme that if you criticize Bibi, you are an anti-semite, which nothing could be further from the truth. Netanyahu is the Israeli version of tRump*.
and FYI: "Since December 2016, Netanyahu has been under investigation for corruption by Israeli police and prosecutors. On 21 November 2019, he was indicted on charges of breach of trust, bribery, and fraud. Due to the indictment, Netanyahu is legally required to relinquish all of his ministry posts other than the prime minister position.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Netanyahu
malaise
(268,971 posts)Sorry, but criticizing the policies of Netanyahu DOES NOT make a person an anti-semite...
Ditto
dware
(12,369 posts)but there was a lot more than just that, as has been pointed out numerous times in this and other threads.
Corbyn was an unrepentant anti-Semite and a far left Marxist.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)I think his election defeat is essential for the survival of Israel.
I am talking about sharing platforms with TERRORISTS and people who promote BLOOD LIBELS about jews.
Antisemites have flocked to Labour under his leadership. Not five years ago Labour had a Jewish leader.
And the fact that you tried to change the conversation from Corbyn's supports of terrorists who call for the murder of all jews to Bibi shows a lot about who you are.
Raster
(20,998 posts)... criticizing Netanyahu makes anyone an anti-semite. That's what I objected to and will continue to object to. Netanyahu, for all practical purposes, is akin to an Israeli version of tRump*, and SHOULD BE CRITICIZED.
This is what I objected to: "He criticized policies of Netanyahu which means he's an anti-semite..."
Corbyn appears to be an anti-semite, for which I condemn him roundly.
mucifer
(23,539 posts)what was said.
11cents
(1,777 posts)I don't think you've been paying attention, frankly, if you think that all that was happening was that Corbyn criticized Netanyahu.
It's been an absolute horror show -- Labour forums flooded with classic antisemitic tropes and Jewish MPs hounded out of the party. The large majority (around 85%) of British Jews think that the party has become institutionally antisemitic. But we can't be trusted and our views don't count.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)It's been an absolute horror show -- Labour forums flooded with classic antisemitic tropes and Jewish MPs hounded out of the party. The large majority (around 85%) of British Jews think that the party has become institutionally antisemitic. But we can't be trusted and our views don't count.
This Corbin guy condones it?!
Just sounds like something out of order, usually the left throughout time has allowed bigger coalitions
warrior1
(12,325 posts)Mike 03
(16,616 posts)much deeper than they got on BBC.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)It wasnt the alleged anti-Semitism, it was the identification with The Other, who just happen to be immigrants too.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)He supported Hamas and Hezbollah and the IRA
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/13/jeremy-corbyn-labour-leadership-foreign-policy-antisemitism
He blamed Zionist lobby" for securing the deportation from Britain of the cleric infamous for promoting the blood libel.
https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/jeremy-corbyn-blamed-zionist-lobby-for-blood-libel-cleric-raed-salah-s-expulsion-from-the-uk-1.482455
He supported the IRA
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11924431/Revealed-Jeremy-Corbyn-and-John-McDonnells-close-IRA-links.html
He also was present at a ceremony honoring the terrorist who perforated the Munich massacre.
He is an antisemite which is a huge problem on the left.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)I don't know, but it certainly isn't in the US. The majority of of American Jews in this country are Democrats.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)And if you looked at the comments on the page when Corbyn's support of antisemitic terrorists are brought up the subject is changed. That tells you what you need to so.
This is before we even talk about is open support of IRA during The Troubles.
Last edited Sat Dec 14, 2019, 06:15 AM - Edit history (1)
I'm in no way a Corbyn supporter and he may well be as anti-semitic as
claimed, but there seems to be some disagreement about just what is and what's not anti-semitic. I've seen and heard very reasonable seeming people equate criticism of Israel and/or Netanyahu
with anti-Semitism and that, frankly, is just bullshit -- Israel is a nation and 'Bibi" is a.politician...Neither is more above criticism than any other nation ot politician.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)That telle you all you need to know"
Really?
The only thing that tells me is that they AGREE with you.
I'm sorry, but I see no hard-core Corbyn supporters here -- As the OP might suggest, most of us barely know him. As Americans, we're far more involved with our own politics right now.
bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)And because of his opposition to the EU, he was very unclear about Brexit.
That appears to be the primary factor in losing Scottish support.
People opposed to Brexit really had no one to vote for in this election.
His lack of clarity, plus his baggage, were deal-breakers.
Poiuyt
(18,123 posts)That would explain a lot. Plus all the other crap.
bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)maxsolomon
(33,327 posts)Even if they're a "Marxist Anti-Semite" like Corbyn or a "Neocon Centrist" like HRC.
Allowing Conservatives power is far worse that compromising your purity. Its a lesson the Left never seems to learn.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)My guess, Scotland votes to leave the UK and Northern Ireland acts as a pivot point between the EU and the U.K., with Northern Ireland staying in the EU customs union.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Can work this to significant economic advantage.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I don't see that happening unless England literally fall apart after Brexit (it should come close), because as long as the Unionists have a thread to grab onto, they won't allow a united Ireland.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)in a western democracy.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)anywhere.
Otto Lidenbrock
(581 posts)1.) He was a backbench MP for thirty years which essentially meant he was an outsider/rebel through the Tony Blair years. Not just on Iraq which he was on the right side of history on, but Blairism/Centrism/Neoliberalism. That's despite the fact the Blair government was overwhelmingly popular with the voters.
2.) To go from a backbench MP to leader of the party meant all of a sudden he went from obscurity to household name. He didn't like media intrusion but that's part of the job. He couldn't mask the fact he disliked it and came across as cold.
3.) He's a pacifist who in the past said the use of nuclear weaponry as a strongarm was a waste of money but also morally abhorrent. That made him look weak for someone to be commander of the armed forces.
4.) His social policies as individual items actually poll popularly but he was promising too much too soon and it just enabled the same old arguments of how you will pay for it.
5.) He excited a lot of new young people into politics and the Labour party membership exponentially grew but they were mainly in London or university tows which are metropolitan and pro-EU. He couldn't win over the traditional labour seats which are pro-Brexit, more white and more elderly.
6.) His selection for Shadow Home Secretary was considered very weak on crime and immigration.
7.) He was historically a Eurosceptic and didn't campaign passionately to remain in the EU even though 70% of his party voted to. That lost him a lot of the Remainer vote because they just didn't trust his Brexit policy.
8) The Leaver vote didn't trust Labour however because they got characterised as pro immigration and open borders (sound familiar?).
9) Most of his party MPs didn't respect him as Leader and overwhelmingly voted no confidence in him in 2016 triggering a leadership challenge. He beat his moderate labour opponent easily and that gave him more authority to run the party as he saw fit. The MPs now became the rebels.
10) He was savagely treated by the right wing press. So was his predecessor Ed Miliband. Neither tried to fight back, instead trying to take a moral high ground. That just allowed the innuendo to carry on. Tony Blair in contrast had the media dancing to his tune because of his rapid response team and spin doctor Alastair Campbell and they didn't have social media.
11) He's just a bit of a boring character. On many aspects he makes a lot of sense which is why young people like him. He makes the case for issues that affect their future and very progressive. But he's just not a good salesman in front of the camera. People say he's an empathetic guy in person so the difference when he visits an NHS hospital or homeless shelter is stark compared to Johnson who is out of touch. But Johnson can play up to the cameras and throw a zinger. Corbyn just sticks to the script.
12) Corbyn was 66 years old when he became leader and never even held any committee role before. He didn't seek to become leader initially --- other people kept nominating him to move the party left and eventually he agreed to run. He didn't have ambition for power but once he got it by a bit of a fluke he wouldn't let go.
comradebillyboy
(10,144 posts)JHB
(37,160 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)Or, it's ok that a raging bigot, right wing Tory wins, as long as a leftist doesn't??
> Boris Johnson Called Gay Men 'Tank-Topped Bumboys,' Black People 'Piccaninnies' W 'Watermelon Smiles And Compared Muslim Women To "Letterboxes." Business Insider, *Nov. 22, 2019. https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016243899
malaise
(268,971 posts)Well put
mathematic
(1,439 posts)He's a socialist, not a liberal. He appointed a literal marxist, John McDonnell ("We've got to demand systemic change. Look, I'm straight, I'm honest with people: I'm a Marxist.", 2008) to be Labour's finance minister.
On top of that, Corbyn has been a lifelong euroskeptic and everybody knows he wants to leave the EU, so the approximately 50% of the public that wanted to remain in the EU did not think they were going to get that by voting for Labour.
Corbyn made it hard for huge swaths of the electorate to vote for him. The only reason Labour gained seats in 2017 was because remainers were still entertaining the fantasy that Labour was the only party that could stop brexit. Too bad Labour was a brexit party all along.
Polybius
(15,398 posts)That's another reason for their gains last time. Boris sucks, but he has more of a following, and is dangerously evil with intelligence thrown in.
malaise
(268,971 posts)That is a losing option.
Polybius
(15,398 posts)Can't be like that and win.
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)sounds like a bigoted statement.. What are we now, all anti-rural?
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)they who are anti city. The same damn thing is going on over there as here. I'm not anti rural I'm making an observation. IT'S RACISM AND ANTI IMMIGRATION. Is this a news flash for you?
whathehell
(29,067 posts)I don't know that "the same damn thing is going on there as here" and I doubt you do either.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)So conservatives promised to go on with it. Labour wanted another referendum. In the end, this is a weak position.
bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)So why vote for him?
bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)Many foreign owned cos do EU business but have tax haven in London. They would lose this if UK stays in EU
IE cash before country
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)I never wished for that before but the Brexit voters need to get what they asked for