Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

treestar

(82,383 posts)
1. They had honor
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 12:34 PM
Dec 2019

They would not dream of playing a game of the rules, like McConnell; if you don't like the bill, it should still be voted on - you don't use your position just to stop it, and doing so shows you are conscious it's the only way to avoid it. If the opponents won, they accepted it rather than cheat.

bluedye33139

(1,474 posts)
2. I think impeachment is part of our checks and balances because
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 12:34 PM
Dec 2019

The founders knew that human nature was this way.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
3. And, they didn't anticipate the guns that are available and used, today.
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 12:40 PM
Dec 2019

I'm sure the Founding Fathers are whirling in their graves at what is happening today. My parents, as well.

Honor and truth are unfortunately disappearing and the Repukes are showing us how it can be done without shame. McConnell and Graham are good examples. They should be ashamed to be following Trump's wishes so closely.

Perhaps the Democratic ads that will be coming out for 2020 will open their eyes, but I doubt it.

CatMor

(6,212 posts)
4. Unfortunately some of them indulged in slavery ....
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 12:41 PM
Dec 2019

which was horrible and led the country to the racism of today. Racism is one of the reasons trump is in office.

ariadne0614

(1,736 posts)
6. Enlightenment thinkers were a different breed of men. n/t
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 12:42 PM
Dec 2019

The reThugs prefer a depraved combination of monarchy and mob rule.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,869 posts)
7. People were that horrible way back when.
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 12:46 PM
Dec 2019

People have always been horrible, and the British monarchy was no exception - which is why the Revolution happened in the first place. The founding fathers were men of the Enlightenment, though, and as such believed people were capable of behaving rationally. They did anticipate the possibility of a rogue president, which is why they created three equally powerful branches of government and the remedy of impeachment as a check on such a president. What they didn't seem to anticipate was the simultaneous rise of a rogue president along with a political party that enabled and encouraged him. (Political parties as we know them now didn't even exist until factions arose during the drafting of the Constitution - there were struggles between those who favored a strong federal government and those who favored states' rights. The federalists and their opponents ended up creating distinct parties, which evolved into what we have now. Washington didn't like the idea of parties at all.)

 

shockey80

(4,379 posts)
8. Good post.
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 12:52 PM
Dec 2019

The founding fathers were very smart men, however they could not predict the future. The constitution they gave us, gave the people the ability to protect themselves from the unpredictable. It's all about the people.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
9. They were plenty horrible. They enabled slavery for one thing.
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 12:52 PM
Dec 2019

But, given how much the country and the world have changed, I imagine they'd be shocked to learn that the US Constitution has not been rewritten at least once. However, a constitutional convention would be an absolute disaster with all of the deep red states having undue influence (just as slave states were given undue influence with the Electoral College). There's virtually no chance an amendment could get passed in today's climate, and if one could, I doubt any of us would like it.

We've gone from 13 colonies and a population of 2.4 million to 50 states and a population of 327 million (including an 80:1 ratio between the most and least populous states). With a tyranny of the minority political system that is virtually impossible to reform for the very reasons why it needs to be reformed.

What are we to do when nearly 70% of the population is represented by just 30% of the US Senate, as is expected to be the case by 2040? That's not rhetorical. What are we to do? That's not a tolerable situation, but I'm at a loss as to what we might do about it.

world wide wally

(21,755 posts)
10. They never considered someone so totally obsessed with winning at any cost.
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 12:53 PM
Dec 2019

Damn the torpedos. Full steam ahead!

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
11. History is full of examples of the moral depravity of humans. The U.S. Founding Fathers were
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 02:12 PM
Dec 2019

well aware of the potential for Moral Depravity by persons unknown to them . That would include tRUMP, the reTHUGS and their counterparts worldwide. The Constitution isn't perfect but it still serves
those who pay attention today and make an ethical pledge to it. The Framers didn't have foresight but
they knew human nature.

andym

(5,445 posts)
12. They didn't consider the rise of a two-party system and the resulting partisanship
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 02:17 PM
Dec 2019

but they came up with a compromise that they thought could work-- impeachment did work under Nixon, and he resigned. It would have failed at many other times.

DFW

(54,445 posts)
14. One imaginary conversation between Th. Jefferson in 1818 and someone in California in 2010
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 08:02 PM
Dec 2019

It's from a book a few DUers know about. Went like this:
___________________________________________
“My, my,” mused Jefferson, “I hope the wine is as good that far in the future as it was when I was there.” That far in the future. The concept of the year 1860 being “far in the future” was, needless to say, rather novel to me.

“Oh, it is,” I assured him. “I have tried it. A huge plague befell, er, or rather, will befall the region in 1870, and most of the vines will perish. Only a very few will survive, but Bordeaux wine will live on, not only at home, but in California, Australia, South Africa, Chile, many places.”

“Fascinating, but please leave it at that,” Jefferson cut me off. “Remember, Robert, I can’t know any of this, and it would risk much if I were to let on by casual error that I did.”

“Sorry, sir,” I said. “I got carried away by the moment. About what I wanted to ask you…”

“Go on,” he prodded.

“There’s a woman there. In Bordeaux, I mean. I’ve fallen hopelessly in love with her. She speaks no English, and I can’t bring her to my world. To be with her, I would have to abandon my own world, with no recourse of return should I regret my decision, go to an era where creature comforts I take for granted do not exist, and I would have to gnash my teeth and keep silent about everything I know that is going to happen, every armed conflict, every cataclysmic world event. But I have waited all my life to feel this way about a woman, and I feel it is worth the risk. Am I crazy to contemplate this? Should I abandon the thought?”

Jefferson pondered. “I had only ten years with my Martha. She died before her thirty-fourth birthday. I was devastated. I must have spent three weeks inside a room in utter despair. Much later, I took up with someone that was completely illicit, at least in my day.”

“It’s all right, Mr. President, we all know about Sally Hemings, and don’t consider it a stain on your legacy at all.”

Jefferson looked stunned. “Really? You all know about Sally? Please don’t even tell me how. I don’t want to know. You can’t imagine what a scandalous thing this is in my time. Our country, then, has truly become the beacon of enlightenment we hoped--Franklin, Madison, the others.”

“Well, not entirely, I’m afraid,” I answered. “There are still strong, even violent forces of reaction that would bring the country back to the days when people were burned at the stake for such things. But they are a distinct minority, to be sure.” I didn’t want to get into the Texas School Board. “We even abolished slavery entirely in 1865.”

“It took that long? I failed in my efforts to get slavery abolished over the years, although I still hold some slaves myself to this day. Ironic, isn’t it? Many of us who were part of the beginning of this country envisioned abolishing slavery altogether by 1808. As president, I even signed a law back in 1808 banning the slave trade with Africa. Some of us had hoped to have slavery abolished by then, but we underestimated the resistance from the southern states, whose economies depended upon its continued existence. From what you say, it took far longer than any of us thought it would. I am glad to hear that it was finally done away with, although I imagine it had enormous economic consequences for the southern states. I’m sure some of them must have had a few objections.”

Oh, just a few, yeah. I didn’t comment on that.
--------------------------------------------------------

I always wondered how close to that a real conversation with Jefferson at age 75 would have been?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't think our Foundin...