General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMedicare patients end up owing huge hospital bills if they enter under "observation" status instead
Last edited Sat Dec 21, 2019, 02:44 AM - Edit history (1)
of being classified as "admitted."
Some hospitals even put patients scheduled for elective surgery into the category of observation status in order to avoid accepting Medicare Part A for their care.
ON EDIT: It appears to me that this physicians problem was he had Part A and a supplement Medigap policy, but for some reason didn't opt for Medicare Part B. Part B is what covers outpatient procedures and many other important things. I can't imagine why 2 physicians would make that mistake, but I can see why many other people might.
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-12-20/medicare-coverage-hospitalization-patient-costs?fbclid=IwAR22W7myfN7oBcugFIDqeqmX90xlySAxRkQrAhDx1gH7goI_9Uj8gJE7nBU
Medicare Part A was designed to provide that insured right to hospital care and is available without cost to every 65-year-old person who qualifies for Social Security. Unfortunately, Medicare Part A has a major gap in its coverage. As a senior citizen with Medicare Part A, I fell through that gap. I was diagnosed with prostate cancer, entered the hospital for a radical prostatectomy and spent the following two nights on a general surgical ward. Several weeks later, I was blindsided with a $25,334 bill for my hospitalization. The surgeons bill was an additional $4,695 that was not covered by Part A.
Certain the bill was a mistake, I contacted the hospital billing department to remind them that I had Medicare Part A, and that Medicare Part A pays the cost of hospitalization. That is correct, the hospital representative replied. But I hadnt been admitted, I was told; I had been hospitalized as an outpatient under observation status.
Since I hadnt been formally admitted, those expenses werent covered by Medicare Part A, which doesnt cover observation status. I was stunned and incredulous. General anesthesia, major surgery, two nights on a surgical ward and not admitted? My wife and I are both physicians, but neither of us had any clue that this could be the case.
dalton99a
(81,471 posts)Medicare Part A is often supplemented with Medicare Part B or other insurance to help cover outpatient services, doctors fees and drug costs. Under Medicare Part B, the patient is typically responsible for 20% of the Medicare approved amount for each service. For a hospitalization, that can be a very significant out-of-pocket cost. (I wasnt enrolled in Part B, but did have Blue Cross/Blue Shield supplemental insurance, which required me to pay 20% of the allowable hospital and surgical charges.)
In recent years, an increasing percentage of patients are being placed in observations status. Indeed, some hospitals place up to 70% of their patients in this category.
Why would a hospital categorize a patient under observation status? There are two advantages. First, observation status allows the hospital to avoid accusations of improper hospital admissions or billing by Medicare. Second, a hospital can charge a patient who has only Part A coverage and is on observation status more than Medicare will allow if the patient is admitted.
Karadeniz
(22,513 posts)LonePirate
(13,419 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)So if the single payer option is Medicare For All, these will probably still be the rules!
Hospitals must follow Medicare guidelines, and its those guidelines that define what inpatient status is, and what observation means.
Its Medicare that doesnt want to pay the inpatient rates, and not the hospitals. Believe me, the hospitals would love the increased revenue that comes with more inpatient admissions.
LonePirate
(13,419 posts)forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)Im just saying that if Medicare For All is a concept built upon Medicare, there will be rules.
We won be able to just get whatever care we want for free.
Right now the Government makes the rules for Medicare, so why do you think those rules would change so drastically? So instead of the patient directly paying the bill, the hospital or the taxpayers would be responsible? I just dont see it working out so well.
We will just agree to disagree.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,010 posts)AJT
(5,240 posts)off of observation status until the social worker could get insurance approval for skilled nursing rehab, and discharged us to the rehab facility before the hospital could change her status to observation. I am grateful to good doctors and social workers who work hard within the system to help patients.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)instead of regular Medicare with a supplemental? Pretty sure they could afford better coverage.
As for the observation status issue - I thought everyone had become aware of that issue years ago. Surprised again that two physicians were not aware of that problem. Guess it is good that they are talking about it so more will be aware of hospital tricks.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,853 posts)as one of the other supplementals.
It's what I have, and so far (6 years now on Medicare) I'm very happy with it.
It looks as if the people in the article had never gotten any supplemental or Advantage plan at all, which is the problem. Unfortunately, like almost all of the health care coverage in this country, these things are complicated and difficult to figure out.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)from that I had to get a lawyer friend to help me decipher the impenetrable prose. Also, so many initialisms (i.e., abbreviations consisting of the first letters of a phrase) were used that I couldn't figure out what many of them referred to.
Now, I have 3 degrees and certain resources (like that lawyer friend), so I was probably in a better position to figure stuff out than many, perhaps most, who need to sign up for insurance plans, but I still was terribly confused and not at all sure that what I finally chose was the best plan for me--or that it would cover everything I thought (hoped) it would cover.
llmart
(15,536 posts)I've had both and depending upon which supplemental plan you choose, if you choose the G plan it is almost always better than an Advantage plan.
GReedDiamond
(5,311 posts)...I'm going for the Part B, plus then going to my current health insurer to look into supplemental plans, if I can afford em.
BTW, the current Part B monthly premium is $144.60.
Thanks for posting this, pnwmom.
Edited to change "Madicare" (!) to Medicare.
Liberal In Texas
(13,548 posts)The Advantage Plans look good and are all glowing with extras like vision and dental, gym memberships.
Just remember they're private insurance and if you get really ill and need really expensive coverage they might drop you like a hot rock.
I have supplemental through my former employer. Because you need that. The repubs decided a long time ago we had to pay 20%. So you need a supplemental for the rest.
But really. Stay away from the advantage plans. I love my "pure" medicare.
GReedDiamond
(5,311 posts)"I have supplemental through my former employer. Because you need that."
My former/current employer is me.
Any supplemental will have to also have to be paid by me, if I can afford it, but also if I think I MAY need "it," whatever "it" is.
Probably dental & vision, I suppose.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)If you don't think you need it, get the cheapest available. If you put it off, it will cost more when you eventually sign up. And the monthly penalty for delay is permanent.
My "maintenance" drugs are pretty cheap, so I get the lowest-price part D.
I priced out separate dental and vision, but they don't seem to be worth the cost. Glasses are fairly reasonable at Costco, and dental, well that's a bite out of the budget.
GReedDiamond
(5,311 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)I thought the rules prohibited that for such plans, even before Obamacare?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)There is a lot of misinformation out there. I would try to correct all of it, but I just don't have time to do so. Some people also confuse Medicare with Medicaid, and that complicates the spread of misinformation.
dalton99a
(81,471 posts)If a Medicare Advantage plan gave you prior approval for a medical service, it cant deny you coverage later due to lack of medical necessity.
Your Medicare Advantage plan isnt allowed to make statements such as It is our policy to deny coverage for this service without providing justification.
If you require care thats considered medically necessary, and your Medicare Advantage plan doesnt have providers in its network that provide that care, the plan cant deny you coverage. The plan has to arrange your care from a qualified out-of-network provider.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,853 posts)I don't pay anything extra and it covers everything I've needed so far.
Which admittedly isn't much, but still.
Captain Zero
(6,805 posts)They owed $30.00 and some change at the end. Some Advantage plans are good. There are some independent brokers who can review how you use healthcare and weigh in your risk of hospitalization and help you pick the right Advantage plan. They get paid by the plan somehow or another.
llmart
(15,536 posts)That's a big risk you take. When you're older, anything can happen and you don't want to be caught off guard when it does. You may want to take that risk and that's your choice, but I didn't want to take that risk the closer I got to 70. I am an extremely healthy person and have led a very healthy lifestyle my entire adult life. I've told this story on here before but for those who haven't heard it...
I was diagnosed with wet macular degeneration last year. I had a year of injections that cost $2400 per injection which does not include the doctor's costs. If I wouldn't have had the supplemental Plan G, which I had signed up for only a year earlier, I would have been S.O.L. Up until then I had an Advantage plan because I had the same attitude that you do - that I had nothing wrong with me and was 69 years old.
I am so glad I decided to pay the extra for the supplemental premiums because.
yellowdogintexas
(22,252 posts)so you don't have to deal with out of network issues if you become ill when traveling.
It is not designed to be a profit maker for the insurance companies either.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That's exactly like a network for a private insurer
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)I thought if a doctor doesn't take Medicare you can still get reimbursed for at least part of it, unlike a private plan that only covers in-network care. Am I wrong about that?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The problem is getting whatever the doctor did to line up with whatever treatment schedule the insurer, private or Medicare, has. The default answer is going to be to deny the reimbursement unless you have several months to fight the bureaucracy.
ooky
(8,922 posts)More from the article.
What can be done? If you are scheduled to be hospitalized for elective surgery, get a written statement from your surgeon and from the hospital that you will be admitted and not placed under observation status. If you are already hospitalized, and receive notice of observation status, pressure your surgeon to change your status to admitted, although the hospital is not required to agree to it. These strategies might help vigilant patients, but not countless others who will still be left with unaffordable bills.
RockRaven
(14,966 posts)and if the patient was there longer it was then deemed in-patient by rule. But my knowledge of that is limited. And clearly not congruent with your experience.
Volaris
(10,270 posts)They will admit you.
I had a friend that had a bad uti n kidney infection.
They moved her from the er to a room, kept her 2 nights to get her stable, GAVE her the antibiotic script she needed, and sent her home before the admit deadline.
Yonnie3
(17,434 posts)This is not a problem unique to Medicare.
I had insurance (not Medicare) from my employer. My surgeon wanted me admitted before the surgery, but the insurance said no, this is an outpatient only procedure. I was placed on observation status for over 48 hours. My co-pay and rates were much higher for observation.
The insurance said in writing it was my doctor's fault for not having me admitted. He told me that he was told by the insurance, no admission, observation only. Because I could prove they lied (recording), I ended up getting 100% paid. I was lucky.
Deb
(3,742 posts)87 year old pt sent home to suffer alone -24 hrs after an uncomplicated "elective" knee replacement "short stay". Wtf?
Angry nurses explained how the new rules are sending shocked and unprepared patients away from necessary care.
My advice is to learn home health care, patient advocacy and DO NOT sign your loved one out until they can be assured a safe place to recuperate.
Medicare as it stands can be horribly cruel.
Thanks for posting this link to share
Dem2theMax
(9,651 posts)Both of my parents had multiple reasons to visit the hospital, and you better believe I knew every rule going in. They did not have unlimited income, and we had to count every penny. Every time the medicare book showed up at the beginning of the year, I read every word, and compared it to the year before, so I would know what changed.
Never throw away the book from the last year until you have compared it to the new book for the coming year. Always know what changes are coming.
I went over every medication they were on to make sure it was still covered. And I learned the observation versus admitted rule, and I would stand guard until I heard the word 'admitted.' Actually, any time a doctor or nurse got within 10' of me, I was asking, 'have they been admitted yet?'
Whether you are taking care of a loved one or taking care of yourself, you have to become a patient advocate.
A couple of other suggestions while I'm at it.
Always ask your doctor for sample medications. When samples expire, they have to throw them out. My father was on three different inhalers, and he never would have been able to afford them. The staff at his doctor's office kept him supplied by way of sample medications throughout the entire time he needed them. This was over the course of many years.
Those free samples may keep you out of the donut hole. Another thing is that Costco many times has medications that are cheaper out of pocket than what you would pay with your insurance. Always check Costco medication prices. And make sure that IF you find something that is cheaper at Costco, don't let them use your insurance.
I mentioned the words 'patient advocate.' Our local hospital has patient advocates, people who will step forward and work as a go-between if you are having issues with hospital staff.
My father had broken his hip, and the nurse in charge kept refusing to show me his X-ray so that I could understand what exactly had happened. I finally brought up the words patient advocate, and she got really mad, but that X-ray was in front of me within five minutes.
And one thing I have learned in life is if you have to get someone in charge to help, start at the top. Don't work your way up the food chain. Find out the name of the president of the hospital board, and start there.
You would be amazed at how fast things happen when you complain to the boss.
Lucid Dreamer
(584 posts)D2M, thank you! This is definitely going into my insurance reference notebook.
Insurance is so hard to understand that some info like this is really valuable.
I will share with others.
Dem2theMax
(9,651 posts)I took care of my parents for seven years, and I learned things I never wanted to know. My brain was so full of medical stuff, I don't know how I got anything else in there!
SWBTATTReg
(22,114 posts)Dem2theMax
(9,651 posts)One thing that skipped my mind last night, something I did for my parents and now realize I should do for myself, is to take someone with me when I go to my appointments.
My parents were mentally 100% there, but their hearing wasn't the greatest. I went with them to all of their doctors appointments, never realizing that they pretty much weren't paying attention. And then we would get home and they would turn to me and ask, 'what did the doctor say?' Lol?
Take notes, ask questions, follow up with phone calls or emails if you need to. I am a lot younger than my parents were at the end of their lives, and I still find myself forgetting to ask the doctor questions if I don't have them written down. When I have had serious issues, I have always taken a family member with me for support, and as a second set of ears and eyes.
Goes without saying that this also works in the hospital, not just when you are at a doctors appointment.
As one of my cousin says, 'these aren't the golden years, these are the rusty years!'
SWBTATTReg
(22,114 posts)for even though I'm in my early 60s, I'm profoundly hard of hearing so I rely on interpreters/friends around me to make sure that I haven't missed anything (which is easy to do sometimes). I even make them (the hospital staff) place a sign on the outside of the door to the hospital room that I'm profoundly hard of hearing, beware!
And I rely on lip reading too, for the majority of my conversations, so when a nurse or someone comes into the room, turn the light on so I can see your lips, otherwise, it's just mumble jumbo.
Take care and again, thanks so much for all of the tips.
Dem2theMax
(9,651 posts)So thank you too!
marybourg
(12,631 posts)several times in his last few years. Medicare paid his bills in the ordinary way and we had no surprises.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)but this physician said he didn't have Part B. According to info I've since found, Part B covers outpatient procedures.
progree
(10,904 posts)So it sounds like his Supplement plan did cover Part B the same as traditional Medicare -- Medicare pays 80% and the patient pays 20%.
Anyway, I was surprised to read this. In Minnesota, one has to enroll in Part A and Part B -- and pay the Part B premiums, in order to buy a Supplement plan. Most types of Supplement plans pay the remaining 20%.
I have a Supplement plan that I pay a monthly premium. In ADDITION, I pay the standard Part B premium via deduction from my Social Security benefits.
Interesting that he's not just a doctor but a professor too. Even odder that he would leave himself open to paying 20% of Part B costs, which for say a $500,000 series of surgeries (not uncommon) would cost him 20% * $500,000 = $100,000. But that he would bother buying a Supplement plan in the first place.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)Supplement plans pick up where Part A (which covers hospital admissions) & B (which covers outpatient care, screenings, and other care) leave off. For example, Supplement plans pay for things like deductibles. But Supplement plans don't pay for the bulk of inpatient or outpatient care.
progree
(10,904 posts)a Supplement Plan to cover some/all deductibles and some/all copays. So that's why I say what he says confuses me.
but he did say, "I did have Blue Cross/Blue Shield supplemental insurance, which required me to pay 20% of the allowable hospital and surgical charges."
so I have to assume that whatever the heck he had picked up 80%.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)his Medigap policy is supposed to pay for all but 20% of the 20% that remains after Part B picks up its 80%.
But if he didn't have Part B, then he's on the hook for the 80%, and his Supplement won't help him with that.
It's amazing that two physicians didn't know to get Part b.
forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)Its only after you retire, and no longer covered under your employer plan that you have to start taking Part B.
After you retire you can sign up without penalty.
Medicare Part A has no premium, so you should get that as soon as youre eligible.
progree
(10,904 posts)that leaves him with $30,000 that he has to pay out of pocket.
marybourg
(12,631 posts)when his out of pocket expenses exceeded $2000 for the year, which they did not that year.
progree
(10,904 posts)to pay? That he says he is "stuck with"? Which obviously exceeds $2,000. And not all Supplement plans have a $2000 deductible, mine kicks in on the first dollar.
marybourg
(12,631 posts)progree
(10,904 posts)My bad. I should be more careful.
marybourg
(12,631 posts)OhNo-Really
(3,985 posts)OhNo-Really
(3,985 posts)Medicare for All never excited me. We need health care when we are sick. Its not rocket science. Dont tax us and NOT give us basic needs to survive.
progree
(10,904 posts)The observation status racket is one example (of many) of when it is not.
As for the Medicare Advantage (M.A.) plans some people are touting, realize they are privatized Medicare plans that involve networks -- sometimes very narrow networks, that you get shafted if say you have surgery and you were real careful to pick an in-network hospital and physician, but an out of network assistant surgeon steps in to stitch things up, and/or your anesthesiologist and radiologist and the lab are out of network.
The premiums on M.A. plans are mostly quite low and there are usually a lot of extra benefits, the reason being is that they are heavily subsidized, especially by Republican administrations / Congresses, who want to push everyone into privatized Medicare with its network restrictions. When M.A. reaches a critical mass, goodbye traditional Medicare and Medicare Supplement. Also, the Medicare website and emails steer people to choosing M.A. plans. One has to know about, and hunt down Medicare Supplement plans.
I went the Medicare Supplement (Medigap) route so that I don't have to worry about networks. But all Supplement plans are provided by private health insurance companies, so they are not "pure Medicare" unless one believes UnitedHealth, Aetna, etc. etc. are "pure Medicare" (spoiler alert: they are not).
No matter what, if the provider does not accept Medicare assignment, and not all do, then you are responsible for the bill. That's true of traditional Medicare, Medicare Supplement plans, and Medicare Advantage.
Oh, another thing I saw that just isn't true: Part A is not "free". Yes, there is no premium for those who have worked 40 quarters (10 years). But the Part A deductible is $1364 in 2019. And per benefit period, days 61-90 in a hospital costs $341 per day, and days 91-150 you pay $682 per lifetime reserve day.
Fidelity estimates that a 65 year old couple on Medicare will have to pay an average of $250,000 over their lifetimes in medical costs not covered by Medicare.
Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)My wife and I are both on Medicare Advantage programs. I have been hospitalized 3 times since I turned 65 and my wife twice. I am also on an 'orphan drug' that retails for $95,000/yr. My plan pays about 1/2 of that (and a foundation pays the other half, so my share is $0.00). I have never been billed more than the standard amount quoted in the plan info.
We pay $5.00 for a visit to our Primary Care doctor and $40.00/visit to a specialist. Mist of my other meds are $0.00 and my wife's are $2.50.
I have no complaints.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)the foundation to pay half your drug cost.
Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)And, I have to admit, I have a great doctor who got the meds approved through my Medicare Advantage and the foundation before he even prescribed them for me. He called me to tell me about the drug and how much it cost, then told me the cost to me was $0.00.
progree
(10,904 posts)or doctor's office, neither do any Medicare Supplement plans. People covered in traditional Medicare or Medicare Supplement have to get a Part D drug plan if they want drug coverage (would be wildly foolish not to). Most but not all M.A. plans provide drug coverage, from what I read. Anyway, you did very well .
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)I appreciate the heads up, but bottom line is: stay healthy.
PuraVidaDreamin
(4,100 posts)We entered the system during flu season and a huge bed availability crunch. They were going to admit under 23 hr observation status and because I am a nurse and know this game I told them under no circumstance will we approve being admitted under this category just to wait for a neurology consult due to a new lesion seen on brain scan and maybe some slight new word recall issues found as per strongly recommended by his onc. We will just stay in your ER until the neurologist visits. Wow did the neuro md show up quickly after that.
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)Yours is about the most important post in this thread.
Thank you
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)I know someone who had a heart attack, ended up in bypass, out in 4 days. Was never ADMITTED. Only observation. When he got the $300 co-pay EOB from Humana he called the insurance company... no... I was admitted. Nope, observation - you owe.
It was a small amount considering the the cost of heart bypass and a value of life. He was in recovery with no energy to haggle. He just paid it and moved on.
A year later his wife had bronchitis from hell and ended up in the ER - really serious trouble breathing. They said they were "just waiting for a room upstairs". Sure enough, they planned to hold her for observation. He said if they could not admit her then we need to find a hospital that will and have her transported. He was told Humana had stipulated the terms of her staying so he called Humana. It took few hours of stress that didn't need to be an a call to Humana from the Pulmonology department, but they got it done.