Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

kentuck

(111,089 posts) Sat Dec 28, 2019, 08:24 PM Dec 2019

7

If you were going on trial...?

Would you be on your Twitter machine talking trash about other people involved in the trial, such as the prosecutor or people that may have done you wrong, and screaming that you did nothing wrong and that it is the other people who are "crazy"?

Or would you be getting a good lawyer and putting your best defense forward?

How legal would it be? Could you be charged with a crime for interfering with the upcoming trial? Would it be an obstruction of justice or what?

Just curious...

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you were going on trial...? (Original Post) kentuck Dec 2019 OP

He's used to punching down underpants Dec 2019 #1

He has no defense so he has to try and discredit the witnesses and the process nt doc03 Dec 2019 #2

He is living in a dreamland and it sure will be nice to see him wake up and smell the justice. Baked Potato Dec 2019 #3

You'd do all of that and more . . . if you already knew the outcome. Haggis for Breakfast Dec 2019 #4

Obviously I would not let folks who could 'exonerate' me testify. keithbvadu2 Dec 2019 #5

underpants

(182,788 posts)

1. He's used to punching down

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sat Dec 28, 2019, 08:29 PM

Dec 2019

His career is suing people who can't possibly fight him and then going back to publicity shame them.

doc03

(35,328 posts)

2. He has no defense so he has to try and discredit the witnesses and the process nt

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sat Dec 28, 2019, 08:33 PM

Dec 2019

Baked Potato

(7,733 posts)

3. He is living in a dreamland and it sure will be nice to see him wake up and smell the justice.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sat Dec 28, 2019, 08:51 PM

Dec 2019

Haggis for Breakfast

(6,831 posts)

4. You'd do all of that and more . . . if you already knew the outcome.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sat Dec 28, 2019, 08:57 PM

Dec 2019

keithbvadu2

(36,788 posts)

5. Obviously I would not let folks who could 'exonerate' me testify.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Sat Dec 28, 2019, 09:30 PM

Dec 2019

Obviously I would not let folks who could 'exonerate' me testify.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you were going on tria...