Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,957 posts)
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 03:31 PM Dec 2019

737 Max: Prioritizing cost cutting to blame

-snip-

Although newly ousted CEO Dennis Muilenburg was an engineer, he stuck closely to the financial engineering playbook of his predecessor, Jim McNerney. Whistleblowers and leaked documents have raised damaging accusations that management drove too relentlessly to cut costs and deliver on schedule.

A former senior leader at Boeing, who asked for anonymity to speak freely, blamed the Max crisis on a “push away from engineering excellence, driven by cost-cutting.”

“All of us who care about Boeing, we want to learn from this and ensure it never happens again,” the former executive said. “We have to get back the engineering discipline and make it the No. 1 priority.”

Boeing’s proposed fix for the Max — making sure the flight control system that went haywire in the crashes has multiple redundancies — in concept is solid. In practice, it’s taking much longer than anticipated to ensure the software is bug-free and hides no pathways to another single-fault failure.

https://www.heraldnet.com/business/with-loss-of-a-previous-strategic-advantage-this-disastrous-year-will-be-followed-by-a-precarious-2020/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=3760a2a343-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-3760a2a343-228635337

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
737 Max: Prioritizing cost cutting to blame (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2019 OP
Gee whiz, do you know what all that costs? gratuitous Dec 2019 #1
Why must you always put the QA/QC folks first? All they do is whine and cry. None of them has ever NCjack Dec 2019 #5
In every sphere malaise Dec 2019 #2
Shareholders first! moondust Dec 2019 #3
Regulations...cough...regulations gulliver Dec 2019 #4
Airbus was kicking their ass with the A320 and A321 BannonsLiver Dec 2019 #6

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. Gee whiz, do you know what all that costs?
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 03:35 PM
Dec 2019

It really cuts down the annual bonus, and Boeing executives can barely get by on their seven- and eight-figure salaries as it is! Not to mention all those surviving family members and friends, who are just so whiny. People die every day, what's another few hundred on this or that airplane? Boeing shareholders are really going to be sore if their dividends are affected.

Won't someone please think of the executives?!

NCjack

(10,279 posts)
5. Why must you always put the QA/QC folks first? All they do is whine and cry. None of them has ever
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 04:59 PM
Dec 2019

contributed to the competitive price of the product. It would take the fingers on 10 hands to count the number of times they came close to driving the company to total ruination. And that silly management structure where the head of QA/QC reported directly to the CEO -- that major inconvenience made it impossible to bury nuisance safety assessments.

malaise

(268,980 posts)
2. In every sphere
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 03:57 PM
Dec 2019

promoting business school rubbish over science is destroying standards with tasteless haste.

The engineers will always win over the for profit only business school models.

gulliver

(13,180 posts)
4. Regulations...cough...regulations
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 04:18 PM
Dec 2019

In my subdivision, you can't just decide you feel like building a big retaining wall and putting in a pool behind it. If the retaining wall gives way, your pool washes your downhill neighbors' house into the creek (with them in it). To prevent that we have things like codes, building permits, and inspections. Regulations.

This incident underscores the need for regulations, and shows the folly of the Republican "scrap them regulations" mentality. The FAA needs the budget and regulations to ensure safety of the flying public. And we also need to ensure our businesses (like Boeing) aren't put in a world market situation where there is a race-to-the-bottom for price, safety be damned.

BannonsLiver

(16,375 posts)
6. Airbus was kicking their ass with the A320 and A321
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 05:51 PM
Dec 2019

Still are with this mess. One thing this piece makes clear is the hellish nightmare of single aisle planes on transatlantic routes will be the norm in future years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»737 Max: Prioritizing cos...