Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grasswire2

(13,571 posts)
Fri Feb 21, 2020, 02:51 PM Feb 2020

Could we somehow pin on DU the standards required for fair election??


Lots of disinfo, even here on DU.


1. HAND MARKED PAPER BALLOTS, VOTER VERIFIABLE.

2. STRONG AUDIT TRAIL.

3. STRONG BALLOT SECURITY.

4. NO APPS, NO WIFI TRANSMISSION, NO OPTICAL SCANNING!

State are still buying hackable systems.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could we somehow pin on DU the standards required for fair election?? (Original Post) Grasswire2 Feb 2020 OP
What is this, 1892? frazzled Feb 2020 #1
you stand in opposition to the experts on election security. Grasswire2 Feb 2020 #2
Misleading frazzled Feb 2020 #3
so it takes a little longer.... Grasswire2 Feb 2020 #4

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. What is this, 1892?
Fri Feb 21, 2020, 03:06 PM
Feb 2020

The automatic lever machine was invented in 1892, and every American city was using the machines by 1930. No paper, highly hackable.

No optical scanners? How many days or weeks would it take to count fully paper ballots such as the ones we have (read by opti-scan machines) in which there are often at least a dozen races to choose plus more than 50 judicial retention questions, plus referenda? On the upcoming primary ballot alone in my jurisdiction there are 9 federal , state, county, and municipal races and 17 competitive judicial races.

Sorry, this is the 21st century. No one is going to hand count paper ballots, which isn’t foolproof anyway.

There are many improvements and safeguards to be made, but returning to the 19th century isn’t feasible.

Grasswire2

(13,571 posts)
2. you stand in opposition to the experts on election security.
Fri Feb 21, 2020, 03:14 PM
Feb 2020

BTW, Canada does all its elections by hand counted and tallied paper ballots. In one evening.

Catch up. Or be happy with Trump.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
3. Misleading
Fri Feb 21, 2020, 03:52 PM
Feb 2020

First of all, even Canada uses optical scan in some cases (and even some EVMs). Paper only is for federal and provincial elections only, and scan machines are used for vote tabulation of the paper ballots in several of the provinces.

Federal elections and provincial elections use paper ballots, but electronic voting has been used since at least the 1990s at the municipal level. Committee reports and analysis from Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia have all recommended against provincial Internet voting, but several provinces use electronic counting of paper ballots. A federal committee has recommended against national Internet voting.

Some municipalities in Ontario and Nova Scotia provide Internet voting.

There are no Canadian electronic voting standards.


And the reason is the same: you can hand count a single race for prime minister, or member of Parliament. Hand counting for elections with 25 different races on a single ballot is impractical. Another difference is the vast disparity in voting population in the two countries: 250,000,000 in the US; 31,750,000 in Canada.

Grasswire2

(13,571 posts)
4. so it takes a little longer....
Fri Feb 21, 2020, 03:55 PM
Feb 2020

The chance of election tampering on hand counted ballots is zilch. We've already lost two and likely three presidential elections to tampering. Want to try for more?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could we somehow pin on D...