Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere is a great and fairly short write up from MIT on CDC's botched tests
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/615323/why-the-cdc-botched-its-coronavirus-testing/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1017 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here is a great and fairly short write up from MIT on CDC's botched tests (Original Post)
SiliconValley_Dem
Mar 2020
OP
Great, but missing a piece: Why did the U.S. decline to use the reliable test available 1/13 ????
pat_k
Mar 2020
#1
pat_k
(9,313 posts)1. Great, but missing a piece: Why did the U.S. decline to use the reliable test available 1/13 ????
Excerpt from another informative article (Politico)
Why the United States declined to use the WHO test, even temporarily as a bridge until the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention could produce its own test, remains a perplexing question and the key to the Trump administrations failure to provide enough tests to identify the coronavirus infections before they could be passed on, according to POLITICO interviews with dozens of viral-disease experts, former officials and some officials within the administrations health agencies.
And this, from an article in The Guardian:
By 13 January three days after the gene sequence was published a reliable test was available, developed by scientists at the department of virology at Berlins Charité university hospital with help from experts in Rotterdam, London and Hong Kong.
I would love to see someone like Jane Mayer dig into questions like the following. I want to see the paper trail (emails, memos, meeting notes, guidelines...).
Why did the CDC decide they needed to produce their own test, rather than use the reliable test already developed? (An effort that apparently took an additional 3 weeks.) What process/reasoning, went into this disastrous decision?
Why didn't the FDA immediately trigger a regulatory workaround enabling qualified medical centers to roll out tests that they had designed themselves?
What failures in process allowed the CDC test "performance issues" to go undetected until AFTER they began distributing their test around Feb 5? (Problems identified by recipients, NOT the CDC.)
Why did most states have to continue to send their samples to CDC for an additional 4 weeks (through March 2), causing a "bottleneck"?
This calls for investigation. Whatever the findings, the one constant I think lies behind all the failures is the absence of a sense of urgency fueled by Trump's lie, dismiss, downplay, deny, and ignore COVID-19 "strategy."
Time will tell how quickly we can put in place the means to collect samples from those who need to be tested,** and have those samples transported to, and processed by, labs with the capacity to produce rapid results. Test kits, by themselves, are of no use. There needs to be a system in place.
Time will also tell how high a price this nation will pay for the loss of those critical weeks.
_________
** "those who need to be tested" should include all contacts traced from known cases, as well as symptomatic people, particularly those who live, work, and otherwise have, or have had, contact with vulnerable people."
SiliconValley_Dem
(1,656 posts)2. All very good points to add here
royable
(1,264 posts)3. I predict that the choice was made for the CDC to make its own test so that either drumpf or a donor
could profit from it.
woodsprite
(11,913 posts)4. Exactly! Why give money to Merkel's country. nt
If this is the case, while his impeachment trial began, he may have been making a decision that will lead to the death of many and the collapse of our economy and suffering....