HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Can someone explain this,...

Sun Mar 15, 2020, 07:50 AM

Can someone explain this, "..no longer required to send positive tests to the CDC..."?

EDIT: Solved!!! Thanks everyone for the clarification! You completely eased my mind. I knew I could count on this place to have real answers.
-----------------

I've searched for clarification, but came up empty. Now, is it just the confirmation that doesn't need to be reported, or is this going to skew the actual count/location of infection? Can't find a damned thing...

Also of note, according to the release: “As of today, the state laboratory is no longer required to send positive tests to the CDC for confirmation. Results from tests conducted at the state laboratory are considered final, including results for this case today.”


https://www.kctv5.com/coronavirus/fifth-person-tests-positive-for-covid--in-missouri/article_91d52004-665e-11ea-9bf1-5371d840852e.html


7 replies, 1438 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply Can someone explain this, "..no longer required to send positive tests to the CDC..."? (Original post)
ZenDem Mar 2020 OP
hlthe2b Mar 2020 #1
ZenDem Mar 2020 #6
hlthe2b Mar 2020 #7
dawg day Mar 2020 #2
Cirque du So-What Mar 2020 #4
LisaL Mar 2020 #3
Historic NY Mar 2020 #5

Response to ZenDem (Original post)

Sun Mar 15, 2020, 07:52 AM

1. It means CDC has provided the state labs (and now some commercial labs) with the test and inspected

their procedures and validated their results. Initially, CDC required them to send them to CDC for confirmation. Once a lab has been validated, they no longer have to do so. That is always the case when CDC develops a test for a new organism. As labs show they are able to do so with accuracy, they no longer have to double submit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hlthe2b (Reply #1)

Sun Mar 15, 2020, 08:01 AM

6. Thank you!

I was still half asleep, so I had to read that paragraph 2-3 times. First time I thought it said states didn't have to report cases to the CDC...at all.

Thank you for helping me with my reading comprehension! Oh...and good morning!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ZenDem (Reply #6)

Sun Mar 15, 2020, 08:02 AM

7. Back at ya!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ZenDem (Original post)

Sun Mar 15, 2020, 07:52 AM

2. Maybe they mean the literal samples

Don't need to send the swabs for verification, just report the results?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dawg day (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 15, 2020, 07:59 AM

4. That's how it sounds to me

Running second analyses is a significant bottleneck and unnecessary redundancy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ZenDem (Original post)

Sun Mar 15, 2020, 07:59 AM

3. it means state laboratories will do the tests, and the results will be considered official.

They don't need to send tests to CDC anymore for confirmation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ZenDem (Original post)

Sun Mar 15, 2020, 08:00 AM

5. Well they can't skew the numbers now

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread