Sun Mar 22, 2020, 10:48 AM

Soph0571 (9,555 posts)

Michigan governor blames GOP and 'separation of church and state' on failure to ban megachurch

gatherings

“One thing that kind of puzzles me is that you have limited groups of people to 50 or fewer,” Roberts explained. “Yet, there is an exemption for places of worship. Why would a place of worship be any less likely to transmit diseases in a larger gathering than another place?”

“It’s not,” Whitmer agreed. “And we’re discouraging people from gathering at all.”

“So, why this exemption?” Roberts pressed.

“Well, you know, the separation of church and state, and the Republican legislature asked me to clarify that that’s an area that we don’t have the ability to enforce and control,” Whitmer said. “We are encouraging people though, do no congregate.”

[link:https://www.rawstory.com/2020/03/michigan-governor-blames-gop-and-separation-of-church-and-state-on-failure-to-ban-megachurch-gatherings/|]

Yet another example of the grift being more important than the people. Megachurch gotta get paid after all - so they can spend their congregants bucks on buying influence from the republicans, who are then telling the governor that he cannot shut churches down. And round and round and round they go - not caring about the risk to lives.

8 replies, 830 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

8 replies	Author	Time	Post
Michigan governor blames GOP and 'separation of church and state' on failure to ban megachurch (Original post)	Soph0571	Mar 2020	OP
Its called an emergency declaration due to public safety...	Historic NY	Mar 2020	#1
What a chicken shit answer. This has nothing	Phoenix61	Mar 2020	#2
Whitmer is a woman, and a Democrat	Takket	Mar 2020	#5
Perhaps Darwin will take care of this.	Yonnie3	Mar 2020	#3
what exactly does the GOP legislature in MI have to gain from encouraging their primary voting block	Takket	Mar 2020	#4
Yes, they are that stupid.	PhilosopherKing	Mar 2020	#7
So does the 2nd Amendment require gun shows to be exempt too?	DBoon	Mar 2020	#6
That's a really bad, pathetic answer. It's also wrong. She should ask her AG, not legislature.	degage	Mar 2020	#8

Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 10:51 AM

Historic NY (35,390 posts)

1. Its called an emergency declaration due to public safety...

somebody need to get their act together. I'm almost positive the church wasn't built w/o any public officials approvals, due to building codes etc.

Reply to this post

Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 11:01 AM

Phoenix61 (12,811 posts)

2. What a chicken shit answer. This has nothing

to do with separation of church and state and everything to do with fear of separating himself from their donations.

Reply to this post

Response to Phoenix61 (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 11:07 AM

Takket (16,569 posts)

5. Whitmer is a woman, and a Democrat

She wants the churches shut down but the GOP holds the legislature and won't let her.

Reply to this post

Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 11:03 AM

Yonnie3 (12,847 posts)

3. Perhaps Darwin will take care of this.

Unfortunately the collateral damage may be extreme.

That pesky First Amendment vs. the public good.

Reply to this post

Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 11:05 AM

Takket (16,569 posts)

4. what exactly does the GOP legislature in MI have to gain from encouraging their primary voting block

to congregate and possibly die?

Are they really that stupid?

Reply to this post

Response to Takket (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 11:26 AM

PhilosopherKing (316 posts)

7. Yes, they are that stupid.

Money > Lives

Reply to this post

Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 11:14 AM

DBoon (19,754 posts)

6. So does the 2nd Amendment require gun shows to be exempt too?

Reply to this post

Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Sun Mar 22, 2020, 11:31 AM

degage (103 posts)

8. That's a really bad, pathetic answer. It's also wrong. She should ask her AG, not legislature.

I'm not sure how the AG gets into office in MI. S/He may be a Republican too and no better than the legislature.

I was reading a real attorney's blog on this subject. That person said, basically, a ban on gathering that bans all groups from gathering, without any bias can ban religious groups without violating the First Amendment. If the ban treats all groups equally and the government has a sufficient interest in putting the ban in place it will pass legal muster.

The government definitely has a sufficient interest in protecting ALL citizens from becoming infected and possibly dying.

There is nothing about the ban that strikes at groups simply because of their religion or because they are religious. Yes, it does impose a substantial burden on them. They are not allowed to practice their faith in public on their preferred dates and times. It does not prevent them from practicing their religion otherwise. The interest in preventing mass illness and death among the general population outweighs this burden.

Reply to this post

General Discussion (Forum)