Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWikiLeaks blames US stance on Julian Assange for Libyan embassy attack...
WikiLeaks has sparked outrage by suggesting the Libyan embassy was attacked because the US gave tacit approval to British threats to storm the Ecuadorian embassy and remove Julian Assange.
WikiLeaks has sparked outrage after suggesting the Libyan embassy was attacked because the US had backed Britain's threat to storm the Ecuadorian embassy in London and remove Julian Assange.
The website issued a tweet suggesting that America had given 'tacit approval' to the threats from the Foreign Office.
At the time the FCO was warned that if they removed Assange it would jeopordise its own diplomatic rights in other countries.
WikiLeaks has sparked outrage after suggesting the Libyan embassy was attacked because the US had backed Britain's threat to storm the Ecuadorian embassy in London and remove Julian Assange.
The website issued a tweet suggesting that America had given 'tacit approval' to the threats from the Foreign Office.
At the time the FCO was warned that if they removed Assange it would jeopordise its own diplomatic rights in other countries.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/9540770/Wikileaks-US-gave-its-tacit-approval-for-attacks-on-embassies-by-supporting-UK.html
Sid
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1202 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WikiLeaks blames US stance on Julian Assange for Libyan embassy attack... (Original Post)
SidDithers
Sep 2012
OP
ananda
(28,859 posts)1. Making that connection is quite a stretch.
Embassies were attacked well before Wikileaks was even
a glimmer of an idea.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)2. Let me be the first to say...
Wikileaks has jumped the shark on this one.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)3. so, how many people will turn their back on what happened with embassy to embrace yet another con
from this man and the org.
we pretty much are united against romney and behavior with the embassy and the story as a whole.
now that assange steps into it, how many fingers will shift direction and point to us, because assange says it is so.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)4. Yeah, that's a real stretch. n/t
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)6. A big, big stretch...nt
Sid
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)5. Good grief!
Hey Assange, it isn't all about you.
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)7. Apparently Romney isn't the only one who had a "Romney moment" yesterday. n/t
bigtree
(85,996 posts)8. I'm mostly sympathetic with Assange's situation; refuse to pile on
. . . but I just despise this.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)9. Wikileaks thinks everything is about Wikileaks.
It's part of the culture there. That attitude may well have come from Julian Assange, who seems often to have the same opinion of himself.
Wikileaks and the Ecuadorian Embassy situation had zip-all to do with the attacks in Libya, Egypt, and now Yemen. Zip.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)10. Exactly...
Wikileaks and the Ecuadorian Embassy situation had zip-all to do with the attacks in Libya, Egypt, and now Yemen. Zip.
Well said.
Sid