General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGoing after "Antifa" as a "terrorist organization" is like...
...trying to throw a snowball with nothing but cold air.
It's a non-entity. There's nothing there.
Trump talks like he's going after Al Qaeda or ISIS, groups with formalized infrastructure. This isn't that. This isn't even the KKK, which exists on something like a confederation (pardon the pun) style level.
As far as we know, there are a couple of sites claiming to be local "Antifa" groups. We don't know how legitimate they are, and even if they are, they don't appear to have any sense of organization or hierarchy to them. Presumably anyone in them could claim to be legitimately anti-facists, but there's nothing to confirm this.
The only visible presence of people who call themselves "Antifa" are at otherwise peaceful demonstrations against racism or fascism, where these people wearing masks (long before our current pandemic) came in and appeared to want simply to create chaos and havoc. Now, it's possible that some of these people might legitimately be people who think they are somehow doing this in the interests of fighting racism or fascism. It's possible. However, it's far more likely that the people who do this as supposed "Antifa" are simply either anarchists who love chaos, or right-wing provocateurs who want to make people protesting racism look as bad and as violent as possible.
Now, the name "Antifa" of course comes from "anti-fascist." And if everyone who is against fascism is considered "Antifa", then, well, it would be a rather large group, right?
But the thing is, being against racism and fascism is, by all accounts, the normal point of view. It's common sense. So you don't have to call yourself "Antifa" or some silly name just to show you have common sense when it comes to racism and hatred.
The idea that there can be a crackdown on "Antifa" is downright comical. At best, they might end up with a handful of oddball anarchists or their own provocateurs. At worst, it's a backdoor attempt to demonize the entire protest movement on the basis of a largely fictional concept and strawman.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)He can now declare us ALL "antifa"
Celerity
(43,389 posts)Link to tweet
Bill Barr in 1992:
Hes always been that guy.
underpants
(182,819 posts)at least FOR the consumers of the propaganda.
For the believers Antifa is omnipresent all powerful.
The really ironic thing is that Antifa in the US really began in Minneapolis in the 80s. Fighting skin heads on weekends.
BComplex
(8,053 posts)Antifa is all of America, and our traditional foreign policy, in that case.
underpants
(182,819 posts)Going back to Obamas administration. Why they picked Antifa as the super bad guys I dont remember.
CousinIT
(9,245 posts)SKKY
(11,810 posts)H2O Man
(73,556 posts)My cousin directed me to a group on FB that is convinced that "Antifa" is being directed by billionaire Democrats to attack a town near us in very rural, upstate NY. By "coincidence," the local Trump supporters believe this to be true.
global1
(25,250 posts)spanone
(135,838 posts)global1
(25,250 posts)I guess I would agree with you. Supporters of fascism. So does that mean Trump & Barr are fascists?
spanone
(135,838 posts)Shiv
(113 posts)that it will be used like "Commie" and be a new McCarthyism, but rather difficult to get traction with the current state of Congress for a full on mass round-up. I wouldn't do anything but be vigilant and outraged about all of it though. It is a very dangerous direction.
Remember who's playbook they're using ..so far it's working for them.
They hold a lot of power.
kurtcagle
(1,603 posts)The biggest setback for the GOP was the implosion of the Communists in the 1990s. It would take 9/11 and the rise of Al Qaeda to create an effective boogeyman, and that lost its momentum as the two wars wound down.
Antifa is primarily a construct of the far right, used to make false equivalency arguments and scare rural farmers. They are the devils in the dark, the spooks in the shadows, part of the playbook. They are part of an abuser's toolbox, intended to keep their victims afraid.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,465 posts)any living World War II vet who served in the European theater is an OG anti-fa. Perhaps Trump can start arresting them. Also, didn't they liberate France, and overthrow the fascist Vichy gov't? Sounds like people in need of an internment camp.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)No vet I know
Would be in Antifa.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,465 posts)that U.S. troops, who put down the Hitler and Mussolini regimes, are by default, "anti-fascist". They are also the demographic most likely to support Trump.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)And yes, they're anti-fascist....or hopefully they are.
But "Antifa" as an actual group is a very questionable concept.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,465 posts)comes from "anti-fascist" The activities of anti-fascist groups were certainly viewed as criminal by a lot of people during the Nazi occupations. Later, they were heroes, despite the fact that they stole, blew up things, and murdered people.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)It's pointless to use the term to describe an actual group that hardly exists.
Like I said, to be against fascism is the normal default and common sense. No need to confuse people by acting like veterans are part of some "Antifa" movement.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,465 posts)and illustrating the silliness. As to being officially part of a movement, I doubt members of the Underground and other "partisan" anti-fa(scist) groups in occupied countries were carrying membership cards.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Lots of Good info on the new world order and how to bring it about
lame54
(35,292 posts)Pick a suspect
Build your fake narrative
Televise his apprehension and death
People will believe he's guilty
trackfan
(3,650 posts)It's kind of like the weapons of mass destruction.
pansypoo53219
(20,977 posts)BrightKnight
(3,567 posts)are working for big oil or whatever right wing group that doesnt find the demonstration convenient. They are not a new problem.