General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat does authorizing "feds" to arrest protesters taking down statues mean?
First, who are these "feds" of whom he speaks. Second, what authority does he have to have to do this?
unblock
(52,227 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,042 posts)That was superb!
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)hlthe2b
(102,276 posts)His BS means nothing.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)DC park police and others already have the authority to arrest people for it. He's just trying to look tough for the MAGAts.
still_one
(92,190 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Dump needed a strong man moment after his multiple recent fails.
lastlib
(23,233 posts)that is all.
JDC
(10,127 posts)Caliman73
(11,738 posts)That is something that doesn't happen very often.
I like to see him flounder around and go into his talking points. Reporters should keep pressing him on actual details about what he is doing, AND point out that Federal agents are already empowered to make arrests on Federal Property. Also, that Federal Agents have NO jurisdiction on State property without specific authority from that State.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)... that would be a moment. Alas, his voice makes me reflexively hit the "mute" button.
procon
(15,805 posts)Maybe if the statue was owned by the federal government or located on federal lands, but otherwise it would either be state or private owned property where Trump has no jurisdiction.
He's all bluster and bark. He probably has some Hollywood movie clip where Seal Team Six parachutes down in the dark of night and sets up a sand bag bunker topped with razor wire around his precious statues of traitors.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Other than that, not a damn thing.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)...
rally