Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,997 posts)
Tue Aug 18, 2020, 09:52 AM Aug 2020

Divided Federal Appeals Court Allows 'Historic' Emoluments Case Against Trump to Proceed

The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals voted Monday not to take it up, according to a court filing. That means the case can continue in a lower court.

............

A federal appellate court in New York on Monday said it will not stop litigation claiming that President Donald Trump is in violation of the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals voted 8-4 not to rehear en banc the court’s ruling from last year, which resurrected the emoluments lawsuit after it had been dismissed by a lower court.

Revealing a stark divide among the jurists, all four of the judges who voted in favor of rehearing the case signed on to one of two dissenting opinions.

Circuit Judge Stephen Menashi, a Trump appointee, penned a dissent that was joined by Circuit Judges Richard Sullivan and Debra Ann Livingston, who were appointed by Trump and George W. Bush, respectively. Menashi argued that the court’s majority ruling was based on the mere assumption that foreign officials were abandoning plaintiffs’ establishments in favor of the president’s businesses, which he concluded was not enough to establish standing.

“[O]ne might think the court would require the plaintiffs to identify some evidence that at least one official has actually chosen a Trump-located restaurant over one of the plaintiffs’ restaurants for an emoluments-based reason,” Menashi wrote. “But the plaintiffs have no such evidence, and the majority opinion does not think it is necessary. Instead, the majority opinion finds the plaintiffs’ theory of injury so clearly compelling as a matter of “economic logic” that the court can dispense with the normal requirement that standing be based on a concrete injury rather than a speculative one.”


https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/divided-federal-appeals-court-allows-historic-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-proceed/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/17/politics/trump-emoluments/index.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Divided Federal Appeals Court Allows 'Historic' Emoluments Case Against Trump to Proceed (Original Post) kpete Aug 2020 OP
Good! SheltieLover Aug 2020 #1
Kick dalton99a Aug 2020 #2
⭐️⭐️⭐️K&R ⭐️⭐️⭐️ spanone Aug 2020 #3
Forward!!! riversedge Aug 2020 #4
Yay! This is a BFD! spicysista Aug 2020 #5
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Divided Federal Appeals C...