Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone else following this publication today of Senate cointel (Original Post) cilla4progress Aug 2020 OP
More! cilla4progress Aug 2020 #1
Lisa Desjardins thread.... Roland99 Aug 2020 #2
Kyle Cheney thread... Roland99 Aug 2020 #4
Natasha Bertrand has several good tweets. Roland99 Aug 2020 #6
Excellent - thanks! cilla4progress Aug 2020 #3
More...important! cilla4progress Aug 2020 #5
K&R demmiblue Aug 2020 #7
Would this info have made any difference in the impeachment hearing? Bayard Aug 2020 #8
Great question. cilla4progress Aug 2020 #9
Ha...to the Senate? No way. HOWEVER... Roland99 Aug 2020 #10

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
2. Lisa Desjardins thread....
Tue Aug 18, 2020, 10:08 AM
Aug 2020




https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1295710136103833600.html?refreshed=1597760485
BREAKING: Senate Intelligence Committee has just released its final report in its investigation of Russia, 2016, the FBI and the Trump Campaign.

There are bipartisan conclusions and separate conclusions from each party.

Read here: intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/…
FINDINGS:

- The Russian government engaged in an aggressive, multifaceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

2/
SEN INTEL RE: MANAFORT:

"Taken as a whole, Manafort's high level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services ... represented a grave counterintelligence threat. "

3/
THIS - SENATE INTEL RE: PUTIN:
"The Committee found that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian
effort to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak
information damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign for president. "

4/
SEN INTEL, TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND WIKILEAKS:

"Staff on the Trump Campaign sought advance notice about WikiLeaks releases,
created messaging strategies to promote and share the materials in anticipation of and following
their release, and encouraged further leaks. "

More...
5/
SEN INTEL CONCLUSION:

"The Trump Campaign publicly undermined the attribution of the hack-and-leak campaign to Russia and was indifferent to whether it and WikiLeaks were furthering a Russian election interference effort. "

6/
TRUMP TOWER: "The Committee found evidence suggesting ...it was the intent of the Campaign participants in the ... meeting, particularly Donald Trump Jr., to receive derogatory info. ... from a source known, at least by Trump Jr., to have connections to the Russian govt"
7/
TRUMP TRANSITION WEAK POINT: "Russia took advantage of members of the Transition Team's relative inexperience in
government ... and Trump's desire to deepen ties
with Russia to pursue unofficial channels through which Russia could conduct
diplomacy."
8/
"The Transition Team repeatedly took actions that had the potential, and sometimes the effect, of interfering in the Obama Admin's diplomatic efforts. This created
confusion among U.S. allies ... most notably surrounding negotiations over
a UN ... Resolution on Israel."

9/
THE FBI: "The Committee found that certain FBI procedures and actions in response to the
Russian threat to the 2016 elections were flawed ..."

10/
OK, now we go to the partisan additional views in the report. In order as presented, first the Republicans.

Sens. Risch, Rubio, Blunt, Cotton, Cornyn, and Sasse wrote this two-page addition.

---> NOTE: Sen Burr did not join them. He did not offer any additional views.

11/
THIS. GOP INTEL CONCLUSION:

"The Committee found no evidence that then-candidate
Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government in its efforts to meddle in the election." (Pg. 941)

12/
GOP INTEL CONCLUSIONS, more, the FBI FAILED:

"While this Volume did not find evidence of collusion between President Trump and the Russians, it does detail a stunning accounting of the FBl's sloppy work and poor judgment."

13/
NO COLLUSION, GOP Intel members stressed, in bold print:

"After more than three years of investigation by this Committee, we can now say with no doubt, there was no collusion."

(Reminder: this was signed by all GOP members of Senate Intel except Burr.)

14/
Now to the Democrats' additional views on the Senate Intelligence Russia investigation.

(Starts pg 957.)

15/
THIS. DEMS ON SENATE INTEL CONCLUDED Trump team cooperated w the Russians.

"The Committee's bipartisan Report unambiguously shows that members of the Trump Campaign cooperated _with Russian efforts to get Trump elected."

"These are stubborn facts that cannot be ignored."

16/
DEMS' ALARM RE: MANAFORT "The Committee's bipartisan Report found that Paul Manafort, while ... Chairman of the Trump Campaign, was secretly communicating w a Russian intelligence officer w whom he discussed Campaign strategy and ... shared internal Campaign polling data."

17/

DEMS SEEM TO CHARGE COLLUSION BY MANAFORT: " "Manafort took steps to hide these communications and repeatedly lied to
federal investigators, and his deputy destroyed evidence of communications
with the Russian intelligence officer."

More... it's a long quote.

18/

DEMS RAISE COLLUSION:
"The Committee obtained ... info. suggesting that
the Russian intelligence officer, w whom Manafort had a longstanding relationship, may have been connected to the GRU's... operation targeting the 2016 U.S. election. This is what collusion looks like."

19/

TRUMP TEAM, HACKING. Senate Dems conclude: "The Committee's bipartisan Report found that a member of the Trump Campaign's
foreign policy advisory team was provided w advance notice of the Russian plot to
anonymously release hacked emails that would damage Trump's opponent"

20/

INTEL DEMS ON TRUMP TOWER: "That the Campaign leadership's desire to coordinate w Russia failed in this ... instance is hardly exculpatory; ... it is emblematic of the ... intent + willingness to work w Russia in hopes of influencing the U.S. election to their benefit. "

21/

SENATE INTEL DEMS WARN ABOUT 2020, Trump associates now:

"Russia is actively interfering again in the 2020 U.S. election to assist Donald Trump, and some of the President's associates are amplifying those efforts. It is vitally important that the country be ready."

22/

SENATE DEMS CONCLUDE: Russians' "assault on the ... 2016 U.S. electoral process and Trump and his associates' participation in + enabling of this ... represents one of the single most grave counterintelligence threats to American national security in the modem era."

23/

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
4. Kyle Cheney thread...
Tue Aug 18, 2020, 10:18 AM
Aug 2020
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1295711366712627200.html

Per Senate Intellgence Committee, Konstantin KILIMNIK — who Manafort provided internal Trump campaign polling data to — is "a Russian intelligence officer."



The committee wasn't able to determine why Manafort shared polling data with KILIMNIK but also suggested he might have been connected to the hack and dump of Democratic emails by the GRU.



The committee was still actively pursuing the investigation early this year. It subpoenaed EMIN AGALAROV during his visit to NYC on Feb. 20.



The Senate report — even more extensive than the Mueller investigation — paints a far more devastating picture of Russian intelligence operatives' access to the Trump campaign, describing far more insidious connections than even Mueller did in his report.
Senate report indicated Roger Stone drafted pro-Russia tweets for Trump at Trump's request during the campaign.



Number of KILIMNIK mentions in Senate Russia report: 819

Number of KILIMNIK mentions in House GOP Russia report: 0

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
6. Natasha Bertrand has several good tweets.
Tue Aug 18, 2020, 10:32 AM
Aug 2020




https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1295710499322159104.html

JUST OUT: Volume 5 of the Senate Intelligence Committee's Russia report, focused on counterintelligence threats and vulnerabilities. It's 966 pages long. intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/…
Here's a summary of a document about that Michael Flynn sent to KT McFarland in January 2017 that "originated with a close associate of a Kremlin insider," per the committee, and that the WH counsel's office wanted to withhold, citing executive privilege.
Image

Image

"As this experience illustrated, White House intervention significantly hampered and prolonged the Committee's investigative effort," report says. "Most importantly, some witnesses were directed by the White House not to tum over potentially privileged information..."
Image

Wow--SSCI goes further than Mueller did in describing Konstantin Kilimnik's relationship with Russian intelligence. "Kilimnik is a Russian intelligence officer," the report says. kilimnik was Manafort's longtime business associate. (pg 28)
Image

🚨 "Some evidence suggests Kilimnik may be connected to the GRU hack-and-leak operation related to the 2016 U.S. election. This assessment is based on a body of fragmentary information." (pg. 85)
Image
...“Two pieces of information, however, raise the possibility of Manafort’s potential connection to the hack-and-leak operations." Rest is
redacted. (Pg 89)
Image

The report says Kilimnik, who SSCI identified as a Russian intelligence officer, "almost certainly helped arrange some of the first public messaging that Ukraine had interfered in the U.S. election." (pg. 108)
Image

The report confirms my reporting from December that the panel found scant if any evidence of Ukrainian interference. "The Committee identified no reliable evidence that the Ukrainian government interfered in the 2016 election," it says (pg 108)

My story:
Senate panel look into Ukraine interference comes up short
Some Republican senators recently questioned whether Kyiv tried to sabotage Donald Trump’s campaign in 2016. But the GOP-led Intelligence Committee looked into the theory, and found scant evidence to…
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/02/senate-panel-ukraine-election-interference-074796

"In August 2016, following the Campaign's tasking, Stone obtained information indicating that John Podesta would be a target of an upcoming release, prior to WikiLeaks
releasing Podesta's emails on October 7. Stone then communicated this information to Trump..." (173)
Image

WikiLeaks/Assange has long maintained Russia was not the source of the hacked Democratic materials. But the committee says it "found significant evidence to suggest that, in the summer of 2016, WikiLeaks
was knowingly collaborating with Russian government officials.” (208)

Image


see link for images

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
10. Ha...to the Senate? No way. HOWEVER...
Tue Aug 18, 2020, 12:14 PM
Aug 2020

if Mueller had been more aggressive, esp going after those obstructing, things likely would have been much different

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anyone else following thi...