Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums2020 race doesn't compare to Bush-Dukakis in '88 (Boston Herald)
By JONAH GOLDBERG |
August 27, 2020 at 5:56 a.m.
In July 1988, Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis enjoyed a 17-point lead against Vice President George H.W. Bush in a Gallup poll. But Bush went on to crush Dukakis, taking 40 states and winning by seven percentage points. He did so by running an aggressive critics would say demagogic scorched-earth campaign against the then-Massachusetts governor.
Its been fun to watch Republicans and Democrats alike invoke the Bush-Dukakis race this summer. It began with Republicans, when Trumps poll numbers started to sink like a bulldog in a bathtub. Keep hope alive, Team Trump insisted. Bush came back from worse.
Now, with Trumps slight recovery in recent polls and the start of the GOP convention which, according to lore, initiated Bushs 88 comeback Democrats have been pointing to the story as a we can still blow this cautionary tale. As if the party of Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and Al Gore needed a 32-year-old history lesson on that score.
Beyond basic generalities polls can be ephemeral, campaigns can have comebacks, etc. the contrast between 2020 and 1988, not to mention between Bush and Trump or Biden and Dukakis, makes the whole thing feel as forced and ridiculous as comparisons of, say, Trump and Winston Churchill.
Indeed, the only thing useful in the Biden-Dukakis comparison is to consider how much things have changed since 1988.
Sure, Biden is a flawed candidate, but his foibles arent those of Dukakis. The Massachusetts governor was a bloodless technocrat who famously couldnt muster even hypothetical passion when asked in a debate what hed do if his wife were raped and murdered. He was also relatively unknown to many voters and thus easily defined by the opposition. Say what you will about Biden, but most people think they know who he is after his eight years as vice president and more than 40 years in public life.
Its been fun to watch Republicans and Democrats alike invoke the Bush-Dukakis race this summer. It began with Republicans, when Trumps poll numbers started to sink like a bulldog in a bathtub. Keep hope alive, Team Trump insisted. Bush came back from worse.
Now, with Trumps slight recovery in recent polls and the start of the GOP convention which, according to lore, initiated Bushs 88 comeback Democrats have been pointing to the story as a we can still blow this cautionary tale. As if the party of Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and Al Gore needed a 32-year-old history lesson on that score.
Beyond basic generalities polls can be ephemeral, campaigns can have comebacks, etc. the contrast between 2020 and 1988, not to mention between Bush and Trump or Biden and Dukakis, makes the whole thing feel as forced and ridiculous as comparisons of, say, Trump and Winston Churchill.
Indeed, the only thing useful in the Biden-Dukakis comparison is to consider how much things have changed since 1988.
Sure, Biden is a flawed candidate, but his foibles arent those of Dukakis. The Massachusetts governor was a bloodless technocrat who famously couldnt muster even hypothetical passion when asked in a debate what hed do if his wife were raped and murdered. He was also relatively unknown to many voters and thus easily defined by the opposition. Say what you will about Biden, but most people think they know who he is after his eight years as vice president and more than 40 years in public life.
Read more: https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/08/27/2020-race-doesnt-compare-to-bush-dukakis-in-88/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 443 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2020 race doesn't compare to Bush-Dukakis in '88 (Boston Herald) (Original Post)
Mike 03
Aug 2020
OP
sandensea
(21,656 posts)1. Fat Donnie, you're no George Bush
Not to mention the fact that the electorate was a lot whiter in '88, that the incumbent party had a popular president, the economy was still good, etc.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)2. Jonah Goldberg????
Tired of this lazy, ridiculous comparison!