US drone strikes target rescuers in Pakistan – and the west stays silent
http://m.guardiannews.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/20/us-drones-strikes-target-rescuers-pakistan?cat=commentisfree&type=articleAttacking rescuers – a tactic long deemed by the US a hallmark of terrorism – is now routinely used by the Obama administration
Glenn Greenwald
guardian.co.uk, Mon 20 Aug 2012 15.33 BST
The US government has long maintained, reasonably enough, that a defining tactic of terrorism is to launch a follow-up attack aimed at those who go to the scene of the original attack to rescue the wounded and remove the dead. Morally, such methods have also been widely condemned by the west as a hallmark of savagery. Yet, as was demonstrated yet again this weekend in Pakistan, this has become one of the favorite tactics of the very same US government.
A 2004 official alert from the FBI warned that "terrorists may use secondary explosive devices to kill and injure emergency personnel responding to an initial attack"; the bulletin advised that such terror devices "are generally detonated less than one hour after initial attack, targeting first responders as well as the general population". Security experts have long noted that the evil of this tactic lies in its exploitation of the natural human tendency to go to the scene of an attack to provide aid to those who are injured, and is specifically potent for sowing terror by instilling in the population an expectation that attacks can, and likely will, occur again at any time and place:
"'The problem is that once the initial explosion goes off, many people will believe that's it, and will respond accordingly,' [the Heritage Foundation's Jack] Spencer said … The goal is to 'incite more terror. If there's an initial explosion and a second explosion, then we're thinking about a third explosion,' Spencer said."
A 2007 report from the US department of homeland security christened the term "double tap" to refer to what it said was "a favorite tactic of Hamas: a device is set off, and when police and other first responders arrive, a second, larger device is set off to inflict more casualties and spread panic." Similarly, the US justice department has highlighted this tactic in its prosecutions of some of the nation's most notorious domestic terrorists. Eric Rudolph, convicted of bombing gay nightclubs and abortion clinics, was said to have "targeted federal agents by placing second bombs nearby set to detonate after police arrived to investigate the first explosion".
In 2010, when WikiLeaks published a video of the incident in which an Apache helicopter in Baghdad killed two Reuters journalists, what sparked the greatest outrage was not the initial attack, which the US army claimed was aimed at armed insurgents, but rather the follow-up attack on those who arrived at the scene to rescue the wounded. From the Guardian's initial report on the WikiLeaks video:
..more..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ACLU Sues CIA Over Drone Killings
http://theintelhub.com/2012/09/24/aclu-sues-cia-over-drone-killings/
By Stephen Lendman, Contributor
theintelhub.com
September 24, 2012
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been around since the Vietnam era. They were used as reconnaissance platforms. In the 1980s, Harpy air defense suppression system radar killer drones were employed. In the Gulf War, unmanned combat air systems (UCAS) and X-45 air vehicles were used.
Others were deployed in Bosnia in 1995 and against Serbia in 1999. America’s new weapon of choice is now commonplace in Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, elsewhere abroad, and domestically for law enforcement and surveillance. Escalated domestic and foreign use is planned.
A previous article called drone warfare remote control killing like sport. From distant or nearby command centers, operators wage virtual war.
They dismissively ignore human carnage. It shows up as computer screen blips. They look no different from video game images. The difference, of course, is people die.
They’re mostly noncombatants. Studies show militants are successfully hit about 2% of the time. Others are wrongly targeted or happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
On January 13, 2010, the ACLU petitioned Washington under the Freedom of Information ACT (FOIA). It requested legal justification claimed for conducting predator drone targeted killings abroad.
..more..
= new reply since forum marked as read
ignorance lately. 
I suspect that would be resolved should Mitt become president. 
(Not a friend ... he's the son of an acquaintance.)
He's the type who could never in a million years pass the psychological tests required to work in law enforcement - a completely self-absorbed, hateful and antisocial bigot who despises minorities, women, non-Christians, gays, and the disabled. (He refers to the latter, even in public, as "retards."
For most of his young life he worked minimum-wage jobs when he wasn't playing with computers and video games. Domino's Pizza was the most prestigious entry on his resume.
The U.S. Army, however, apparently decided that his deep-seated hatred of anyone who's different, coupled with his computer and video game skills, was enough to outweigh his mental problems. They hired him to fly drones, and he's been killing strangers from an air-conditioned room in Afghanistan for about three years now.
in it's complete cynical simplicity..
One of those things from another era....
We believed it still existed...and it may but it's not being enforced. Who would do it?
because so much has been put on hold for this election. But, there is a silent growing anger about use of Drones policy and our ongoing support of torture and denial of civil and human rights. It's under the surface now...but, it's going to just blow in 2013 if some rethink of our policies isn't forthcoming.
