Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:01 AM Sep 2012

Yeah, that'll work: Republicans Champion ‘Voluntary Taxes’

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/25/republicans-champion-voluntary-taxes/


The Republican-controlled House of Representatives took a break last week from doing nothing to pass a bill to facilitate voluntary taxation. Almost simultaneously, Mitt Romney released his final tax return for 2011, showing that he voluntarily overpaid his taxes by taking less of a deduction for his charitable contributions than he was permitted.

The legislation was H.R. 6410, “The Buffett Rule Act of 2012.” Those not acquainted with the misleading titles often given to Congressional bills might at first glance think this one has something to do with raising taxes on the ultrawealthy.

Of course, Republicans would never actually raise taxes on the ultrawealthy; they think, or at least assert publicly, that the deficit results from too many poor people not paying taxes. But it would be very helpful to them to have a fig leaf that looks as if they had found a way of getting the rich to pay more. That is by encouraging them to voluntarily pay more, as Mr. Romney did.

Named for the billionaire Warren Buffett, what came to be known as the “Buffett rule” is a proposal by Democrats that all those with incomes of $1 million or more pay at least 30 percent of their income in federal income taxes.



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
1. The "Taxation is Theft at Gunpoint" Libertarians preach this "Voluntary Tax" crap a lot.
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:19 AM
Sep 2012

"Where is it written that I have no right to be a selfish wealth-hoarding prick?? When did that fall out of fashion??"

Something about being part of a non-aggression, non-intrusion agenda, I think? Or "Legislating Compassion" is the same as "Redistribution". Either way, benevolence towards the wealthy and letting them off the hook for billions upon billions hasn't yielded much in the way of workers receiving long-overdue productivity gains.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
2. Of course, the logic failure there is that there is no coercion
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:23 AM
Sep 2012

if one lives in a free world where one can leave the US and renounce one's citizenship, and thus, be relieved of paying those taxes. Gunpoint deflected, bullet dodged, whatever.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
4. I think it's called self-deportation! Mitt's family knows how this works.
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:28 AM
Sep 2012

Unlike Mitt's family, they'll have more choices available to them. Some have self-deported already.

Bunch of poisonous, treacherous leeches can go.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
6. Agreed. Let's see how much they like China or Somalia.
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:25 AM
Sep 2012

To say nothing of how long they hold onto their wealth. Hint: probably not very long.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
3. Can the fire department volunteer to go to your house or not?
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:25 AM
Sep 2012

Stupid people are stupid. Voluntary taxes would = no taxes which would = our society falling apart. We need the things taxes pay for.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,175 posts)
5. "Voluntary" for those with incomes over $1 million, of course.
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:34 AM
Sep 2012

The 99% better cough up their new and improved 45% (with no deductions) tout suite, of course. Gotta keep the chateaubriand and champagne flowing for the congresscritters and the "job creators," naturally.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yeah, that'll work: Repu...