Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

andym

(5,445 posts)
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:18 PM Oct 2020

He probably is both sicker than they say, but has a much better chance at rapid recovery than most

Hi is probably sicker based on the information coming out on what they are treating him with, as well as his known risk factors: age and obesity.

Why? He is getting treatment not generally available. He got the Regeneron antibody treatment which confers the equivalent humoral immune response to someone who made very high affinity neutralizing antibodies after three weeks of infection. That by itself should help immensely, because newly replicated and secreted virus particles trying to infect new cells will be neutralized by the antibodies and removed. Many in the biomedical community believe that Regeneron's and Lilly's antibody treatments will be game changers (expensive game changers). They are still in trials, but about 1 million doses might be ready by the end of the year.

That said, once Covid activates the body's own immune defenses, it it likely that the body will continue to fight and actually damage itself in the process by killing infected cells and their neighbors. That is why they have to give dexamethasone-- which is an immune suppressant. That is why Trump is still at some risk.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He probably is both sicker than they say, but has a much better chance at rapid recovery than most (Original Post) andym Oct 2020 OP
Yes, we wont get this treatment but the worst human on earth per earth, does. Eliot Rosewater Oct 2020 #1
And a human who wants to deny treatment from others crimycarny Oct 2020 #2
YES and what most out there dont understand, ACA applies to EVERY SINGLE HEALTH INSURANCE Eliot Rosewater Oct 2020 #8
"In early July, Regeneron and the Trump administration signed a $450 million Hortensis Oct 2020 #15
Yet when he recovers, he'll be spewing a lot of hateful nonsense about how getting the disease is Dark n Stormy Knight Oct 2020 #3
The rest of us--workers, people with kids in school, people trying to live BusyBeingBest Oct 2020 #5
It's my understanding that nobody who survives this virus has a "rapid recovery". They survive abqtommy Oct 2020 #4
No, there are many who have a rapid recovery andym Oct 2020 #6
The thing about those photos yesterday of him pretending to work EarlG Oct 2020 #7
Yes-- they are creating a very rosy narrative andym Oct 2020 #10
Yep. I think they may have pumped out most of the propaganda early, hoping for the best. crickets Oct 2020 #12
He's 74. Remisdivir doesn't work on everybody and monoclonal antibodies octoberlib Oct 2020 #9
Regeneron has positive preliminary clinical data for their treatment andym Oct 2020 #11
Not according to epidemiologist Dr. Feigl-Ding octoberlib Oct 2020 #16
He is technically correct: so far no clinical statistical significance. Not the whole story andym Oct 2020 #17
Thanks for the info! Reducing viral load is never bad. octoberlib Oct 2020 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author andym Oct 2020 #13
That's what I think, too. CrispyQ Oct 2020 #14

crimycarny

(1,351 posts)
2. And a human who wants to deny treatment from others
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:23 PM
Oct 2020

That’s what enrages me. The President will continue his battle to yank medical care away from everyone else. His experience with COVID won’t change that one bit. He’s literally incapable of empathy. Mentally ill.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,131 posts)
8. YES and what most out there dont understand, ACA applies to EVERY SINGLE HEALTH INSURANCE
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:32 PM
Oct 2020

policy IN AMERICA other than Medicare and Medicaid.

So ALL OF YOU will LOSE coverage for COVID when preexisting is put back on as it will be considered such for everyone. Maybe not, but if left up to the FOR PROFIT insurance company, what do you THINK they will do

The GOP knows for every 10 Americans you kill or imprison or deport, 4 will always vote against them, 2 - 3 will and the rest dont vote.

NOT COMPLICATED

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
15. "In early July, Regeneron and the Trump administration signed a $450 million
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:50 PM
Oct 2020
pact for U.S. supply of the cocktail. As part of the deal, Regeneron agreed to ramp up manufacturing to 1.6 million doses of the therapy as early as the end of summer.

The drugmaker said the order covered anywhere between 70,000 to 300,000 treatment doses and 420,000 to 1.3 million preventive doses. Regeneron agreed to provide bulk and unfinished lots of the cocktail as well as finished doses through 2020.

If the FDA eventually grants an emergency authorization for either use, the government would make doses available at no cost and handle distribution."

https://www.fiercepharma.com/manufacturing/roche-regeneron-join-forces-to-more-than-triple-manufacturing-covid-19-antibody

This was as of August 19. Regeneron has also teamed up with Roche to meet huge production goals.

Obviously by July Trump understood that the Republican-advanced pandemic threatened to make him a private citizen.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,771 posts)
3. Yet when he recovers, he'll be spewing a lot of hateful nonsense about how getting the disease is
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:25 PM
Oct 2020

no big deal. People who die from it or suffer long term consequences are just suckers and losers.

God damn him and every single one of his enablers.

BusyBeingBest

(8,059 posts)
5. The rest of us--workers, people with kids in school, people trying to live
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:28 PM
Oct 2020

their lives, some without health insurance or the savings to pay copays and deductibles--aren't going to get free top-notch treatment. It's recovery for his careless irresponsible ass, but medical darwinism for the rest of us.

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
4. It's my understanding that nobody who survives this virus has a "rapid recovery". They survive
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:26 PM
Oct 2020

but can expect major health problems for the rest of their lives.

andym

(5,445 posts)
6. No, there are many who have a rapid recovery
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:29 PM
Oct 2020

many others might have major health problems like damage to the heart, etc.
It really depends how much damage the virus is able to do before the body gets it under control and how much collateral damage occurs.

See for example this
https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200603.471204/full/
Why Do Some Recover From COVID-19 Quickly, While Others Seem Likely To Face Long-Term Disability?

EarlG

(21,983 posts)
7. The thing about those photos yesterday of him pretending to work
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:30 PM
Oct 2020

is that they've kinda set the expectation now that we should see more of them.

If he's doing as great as the docs said, then we should see new photos of him signing blank pieces of paper today.

If they can't even manage to stage a couple of photos for public release, that might say a lot.

andym

(5,445 posts)
10. Yes-- they are creating a very rosy narrative
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:34 PM
Oct 2020

that will set expectations high. Reality, and the idiosyncrasies of a person's immune response to SARS-CoV-2 may interfere with their plans.

crickets

(25,987 posts)
12. Yep. I think they may have pumped out most of the propaganda early, hoping for the best.
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:39 PM
Oct 2020

After this, there may be no more happy, busy pictures left and certainly no video. The lack of tweets alone is telling.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
9. He's 74. Remisdivir doesn't work on everybody and monoclonal antibodies
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:32 PM
Oct 2020

have had no clinical effect on outcomes in the 100 people it's been tested on. Trump is good friends with the CEO of the company that makes it. Yes, the care he's getting might make for a better outcome but doctors aren't magicians so anything could happen at this point.

andym

(5,445 posts)
11. Regeneron has positive preliminary clinical data for their treatment
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:39 PM
Oct 2020
https://investor.regeneron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/regenerons-regn-cov2-antibody-cocktail-reduced-viral-levels-and



Regeneron's therapy is based on cell-synthesized polyclonocal antibodies btw.
September 29, 2020 at 4:01 PM EDT
Back
REGENERON'S REGN-COV2 ANTIBODY COCKTAIL REDUCED VIRAL LEVELS AND IMPROVED SYMPTOMS IN NON-HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 PATIENTS
TARRYTOWN, N.Y., Sept. 29, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --

Greatest improvements in patients who had not mounted their own effective immune response prior to treatment
more slowly in the absence of treatment.

Serological status at baseline also predicted how rapidly patients had alleviation of their COVID-19 clinical symptoms. In the untreated (placebo) patients, seropositive patients had a median time to alleviation of symptoms of 7 days, compared to seronegative patients who had a median time to alleviation of symptoms of 13 days.
REGN-COV2 rapidly reduced viral load through Day 7 in seronegative patients (key virologic endpoint). The mean time-weighted-average change from baseline nasopharyngeal (NP) viral load through Day 7 in the seronegative group was a 0.60 log10 copies/mL greater reduction (p=0.03) in patients treated with high dose, and a 0.51 log10 copies/mL greater reduction (p=0.06) in patients treated with low dose, compared to placebo. In the overall population, there was a 0.51 log10 copies/mL greater reduction (p=0.0049) in patients treated with high dose, and a 0.23 log10 copies/mL greater reduction (p= 0.20) in patients treated with low dose, compared to placebo.
Patients with increasingly higher baseline viral levels had correspondingly greater reductions in viral load at Day 7 with REGN-COV2 treatment. The mean log10 copies/mL reduction in viral load compared to placebo were as follows:
- Viral load higher than 105 copies/mL: high dose (-0.93); low dose (-0.86) (p=0.03 for both); approximately 50-60% reduction compared to placebo
- Viral load higher than 106 copies/mL: high dose (-1.55); low dose (-1.65) (p

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
16. Not according to epidemiologist Dr. Feigl-Ding
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 03:00 PM
Oct 2020

?s=20



?s=20



?s=20







He has a better chance of recovery because of his exceptional medical care and access to drugs but none of these are wonder drugs. 1 in 4 patients on dexamethasone died in the UK RECOVERY trial.

andym

(5,445 posts)
17. He is technically correct: so far no clinical statistical significance. Not the whole story
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 03:35 PM
Oct 2020

Though there is a very good looking "trend" the p values of 0.13 to 0.2293, do not meet the gold standard of being less than 0.05. But that doesn't mean they won't if the population group were larger-- more patients would be needed to be sure. If they were better they could seek immediate approval. So the "unproven" claim is correct, but somewhat disingenuous. It certainly DOES NOT MEAN it doesn't work.

That's why Regeneron posited that their results are very promising, but didn't move forward to immediately approve. This kind of data is very common in drug development.


The data for reducing viral load are better.


Look in this document where Dr. Feigl-Ding got his twitter data image from: https://investor.regeneron.com/static-files/a596a85e-e72d-4529-8eb5-d52d87a99070

The data for viral load production does reach statistical significance for the 8g but not he 2.4 g dose.
Look at the tables called NOMINALLY SIGNIFICANT 0.6 LOG REDUCTION IN VIRAL LOAD THROUGH DAY 7 (HIGH
DOSE VS. PBO) IN SERONEGATIVE POPULATION
and
NOMINALLY SIGNIFICANT 0.5 LOG REDUCTION IN VIRAL LOAD THROUGH DAY 7 (HIGH
DOSE VS. PBO) IN OVERALL POPULATION - IRRESPECTIVE OF BASELINE SEROSTATUS
There the p values for 8g dose are less than 0.05, which means they look statistically signficant.

So it reduces the viral load, which HAS to be a good thing. Keep in mind that the data are preliminary-- the more people in the trial the better the data will be.


Btw, there is the answer for Dr. Feigl-Ding's why they used the 8g dose-- it did reach "nominal" statistical significance in reducing viral load while 2.4g didn't, though clinically the 2.4g dose trended better.



ps-- the optimal drug dose may be 2.4g, but the drug did appear safe within statistical significance, his docs went with the higher dose because it was more "proven" (terrible word really when it comes to stats) than 2.4g in reducing viral load.

Response to octoberlib (Reply #9)

CrispyQ

(36,544 posts)
14. That's what I think, too.
Sun Oct 4, 2020, 02:41 PM
Oct 2020

However, I highly doubt he'll have a full recovery any time soon, if at all. I don't see him campaigning except maybe virtually, & it will be brief video, very brief. I wonder what kind of cocktail they had to give him to get him made up, dressed, & to prop him up at that desk with a pen in his hand this morning? I think very soon it will be apparent that he isn't even up to his usual schedule of tweeting and golfing.

In the meantime, didn't I read yesterday that Barr & Pompeo are searching for ways to get around that pesky succession line & just jump over Pence, Pelosi, & Grassley?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»He probably is both sicke...