Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts) Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:02 PM Sep 2012

The Lead Holds And The Pubbies Have One Less Talking Point-Gallup-Obama (D) 50% -Romney ($) 44%

http://www.gallup.com/poll/election.aspx

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Lead Holds And The Pubbies Have One Less Talking Point-Gallup-Obama (D) 50% -Romney ($) 44% (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 OP

"Romney ($)" abelenkpe Sep 2012 #1

Thanks For Noticing DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #2

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Didn't even notice. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2012 #3

Republicans are clinging to Rasmussen's poll now. bluestate10 Sep 2012 #4

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)

1. "Romney ($)"

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:04 PM

Sep 2012

Perfect!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)

2. Thanks For Noticing

Reply to abelenkpe (Reply #1)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:07 PM

Sep 2012

Tarheel_Dem

(31,233 posts)

3. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Didn't even notice.

Reply to abelenkpe (Reply #1)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:39 PM

Sep 2012

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)

4. Republicans are clinging to Rasmussen's poll now.

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 01:52 PM

Sep 2012

On blogs, it used to be that the Gallop poll showed the race tied. In retrospect, may be republicans should have been fucking americans and nobel opposition instead of obstructing assholes. Americans would be kinder now if republican opposition was principled and republicans did what was in the best interests of the country instead of their own fucking political ambitions.

Reply to this discussion