General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSchool reform’s propaganda flick
The first thing to know about Fridays opening of the school-choice drama Wont Back Down is that the films production company specializes in childrens fantasy fare such as the Tooth Fairy and Chronicles of Narnia series. The second thing is that this company, Walden Media, is linked at the highest levels to the real-world adult alliance of corporate and far-right ideological interest groups that constitutes the so-called education reform movement, more accurately described as the education privatization movement. The third thing, and the one most likely to be passed over in the debate surrounding Wont Back Down (reviewed here, and not kindly, by Salons own Andrew OHehir), is that Walden Media is itself an educational content company with a commercial interest in expanding private-sector access to American K-12 education, or what Rupert Murdoch, Waldens distribution partner on Wont Back Down, lip-lickingly calls a $50 billion sector in the U.S. alone that is waiting desperately to be transformed.
Walden Media is unique in Hollywood in possessing the will and the expertise to effectively promote the cause of education reform. Its conservative Christian CEO, the billionaire donor and strategist for right-wing causes Philip Anschutz, has built what may be the only media empire ideologically inclined and powerful enough to assemble an all-star, all-union cast to carry water for an anti-union crusade on 2,500 screens in wide release (though apparently not strong enough to get that cast to admit it). Wont Back Down is, as even teachers union leader Randi Weingarten admits, an emotionally charged and well-crafted piece of propaganda. For neophytes to the debate and Walden executive Chip Flaherty has described these people as the films target Wont Back Down will send warm Stand and Deliver-meets-Free Willy-style fuzzies fluttering around the otherwise cold phrase school choice. The company hopes the films emotional wallop will linger long enough to drive downloads of the films activist tool kit and enlist new foot soldiers in the education reform movement. But the thing is, Wont Back Down is no more useful in understanding the real politics of that movement than Walden Medias adaptation of Charlottes Web prepares audiences for careers in chicken farming. Of course, thats not the point Walden is aiming for the heart, not the head.
Wont Back Down dramatizes approvingly the execution of parent-trigger-style laws that have been passed in three states and are being considered in a dozen more. These laws give parents the power to form discontented majorities and sell their local public school to private charter school companies. As critics have noted, there is no mechanism in these laws to take over failing private schools. In the real world, the two instances in which the parent-trigger has been pulled have been legal and community disasters, and there is indication that even charter school companies are wary of taking over entire failed schools as opposed to skimming the cream off of several.
But to focus on the parent-trigger plot mechanism in Wont Back Down is to misunderstand the long-term strategy of the deep-pocketed education reform movement. Its plan is to undermine public education from all fronts, to keep throwing reform bills at statehouse walls and see what sticks. Jeb Bushs Foundation for Excellence in Education, the reform movements own version of ALEC (the American Legislative Exchange Council), provides legislators with thick policy combo-packs and encourages them to file legislation in flurries. Anything that moves the needle of public opinion toward privatizing K-12 is a victory. And its a victory for more than just for-profit charter and private school companies. The school-choice army is increasingly diverse. It has a growing digital learning wing of technology and software companies eager to individualize and virtualize American classrooms. There are film education companies like Walden Media, more about which in a minute. There are educational testing companies, such as News Corps Wireless Generation, which have been used effectively to pummel public education but have an uncertain future in the brave new unregulated world imagined by corporate reformers. Keeping the alliance flush with tactics and strategy are the libertarian think tanks at war with teachers unions and the idea that the rich should pay education taxes to support schools their children do not attend. (Given the movements storefront claims to care deeply about poor students of color, it is odd well, not really that its lineage begins with the voucher schemes Milton Friedman cooked up in the immediate wake of Brown v. Board of Education.)
more . . . http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/the_corporate_education_agenda_behind_wont_back_down/?source=newsletter
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)...already in this "movement" of theirs.
Viola Davis was indignantly denouncing picketers at the NYC premier the other night, her voice literally shaking in anger. ( She IS an actress, after all.) Apparently she thought the picketers.... mostly from my minority caucus of our union.... was in fact the "official" union. ( which of course has no problem w. Won't Back Down or with pretty much anything the privatization industry throws at us.) Apparently she thinks she's doing a courageous thing by collaborating with these corporate skunks. She's challenging the status quo!
So, there's plenty of ignorance to go around... not to mention oodles of avarice, ego and opportunism. Our work is cut-out for us. It's not going to be an easy fight and it's not going to be over anytime soon.
I'll settle for small victories now. WBD may bomb, $$ -wise. Waiting for Superman did.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)I saw Superman on a "free night" --- i.e. there's no charge at this particular theater chain in you are a subscriber to a particular cable tv service. So I thought that I was seeing it ( it's important to know the content) w/o supporting it w. $$.
It occurs to me that cable $$$ must subsidize the "free night" in some fashion, so the theater... if not the film makers are making SOME $$$ by my being there.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)I really don't want to see it. Too busy. And I rarely go to movies.