Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NoShit... (Original Post) pbmus Oct 2020 OP
and Skittles Oct 2020 #1
It's called packing, cramming, stuffing the court.l . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2020 #2
ABSOLUTELY CORRECT Skittles Oct 2020 #3
K&R 2naSalit Oct 2020 #4
1890s? 1690s! sandensea Oct 2020 #5
Yea, I wonder if Barrett-nut thinks she can bring back hanging for witches? paleotn Oct 2020 #7
Witches would probably be safer than Democrats, if she had her way sandensea Oct 2020 #11
I hope Joe takes the rope they are giving him and fixes not only the SCOTUS but Boogiemack Oct 2020 #6
Clearly not-- and major reforms are fucking due LymphocyteLover Oct 2020 #8
Proof positive that Murkowski and all other rupublicans have no spine. Mr. Evil Oct 2020 #9
Expanding the SC is doable, dware Oct 2020 #15
That's not correct. TheRickles Oct 2020 #16
That's not true either. dware Oct 2020 #19
An interesting read - thanks for the link. TheRickles Oct 2020 #20
You're very welcome, dware Oct 2020 #21
All the RepubliCON politicians DENVERPOPS Oct 2020 #23
You're the lawyer, Laurence Tribe. What, legally, do you advise us to do? Midnight Writer Oct 2020 #10
The extreme right warpage renders it now the SCROTUS. Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2020 #12
Republicans really don't seem to care about what Americans think. They just want to cram Illumination Oct 2020 #13
No it is not. PatrickforO Oct 2020 #14
Idaho, Wyoming, North and South Dakota, plus Montana TheRickles Oct 2020 #17
There is so much election ratfuckery going on RainCaster Oct 2020 #18
Cheating is winning. Period. czarjak Oct 2020 #22

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
1. and
Sat Oct 24, 2020, 09:39 PM
Oct 2020

with her, the Supreme Court will have FIVE members put there by presidents who did not win the popular vote

is that democracy?

HELL FUCKING NO

 

Boogiemack

(1,406 posts)
6. I hope Joe takes the rope they are giving him and fixes not only the SCOTUS but
Sat Oct 24, 2020, 11:10 PM
Oct 2020

all the appellate courts.

Mr. Evil

(2,844 posts)
9. Proof positive that Murkowski and all other rupublicans have no spine.
Sat Oct 24, 2020, 11:29 PM
Oct 2020

After Biden's overwhelming victory his first act should be to instruct congress to expand the supreme court. Then, they should impose term limits on the supreme court. Then, they should tell all that claim to be republican to go fuck themselves.

dware

(12,377 posts)
15. Expanding the SC is doable,
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 10:56 AM
Oct 2020

term limits isn't without a Constitutional Amendment, which requires 2/3rds of the Congress and 3/4ths of the states to ratify, which means any 13 states can kill the amendment.

TheRickles

(2,063 posts)
16. That's not correct.
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 01:35 PM
Oct 2020

Lifetime terms are not specified in the constitution, only that the justices "shall hold their offices during good behavior". Under this language, they could be transferred to an appellate court role after an SC term that was limited to, say, 18 years. Much good info on the constitutional issues can be here: https://fixthecourt.com/fix/term-limits/

dware

(12,377 posts)
19. That's not true either.
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 01:45 PM
Oct 2020
https://medium.com/@hmichaelharvey/can-congress-limit-life-terms-of-supreme-court-justices-without-amending-constitution-5ee1d18be420

This analysis is a proper construction of a portion of Article 1, Section 8. However, this section does not grant Congress the power to eliminate life tenure under Article III, Section 1 for Supreme Court Justices, that is, I contend, without amending the Constitution.

The Constitution does prescribe a method to terminate the lifetime appointment of a Supreme Court Justice. That method is impeachment.

Article III of the US Constitution created the Supreme Court and gave Justices and other federal judges a lifetime appointment. Section 1 states in part, “… The Judges, both of the Supreme Court and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good behavior…”


You might want to read the whole article.

TheRickles

(2,063 posts)
20. An interesting read - thanks for the link.
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 02:43 PM
Oct 2020

As with so many legal and political issues, many interpretations are possible. And if the final interpretation is up to the SC, then this'll be a tough row to hoe.

dware

(12,377 posts)
21. You're very welcome,
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 02:46 PM
Oct 2020

and I do agree, it would be up to the SC and I highly doubt they would go against their own interests.

Great talking to you, have a peaceful Sunday.

DENVERPOPS

(8,820 posts)
23. All the RepubliCON politicians
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 07:33 PM
Oct 2020

dare not cross the party, or their "Golden Parachute" will go away upon retirement. If they don't carry the parties water the entire time they are in office, they don't get one of those cushy lifetime appointments from some Republican Corporation or Academic Institution.
It's a revolving door for all of them........

Midnight Writer

(21,765 posts)
10. You're the lawyer, Laurence Tribe. What, legally, do you advise us to do?
Sat Oct 24, 2020, 11:40 PM
Oct 2020

I don't see any way to stop this.

 

Illumination

(2,458 posts)
13. Republicans really don't seem to care about what Americans think. They just want to cram
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 10:43 AM
Oct 2020

their ideas down our throats & tell us how much we will LOVE IT!...

PatrickforO

(14,574 posts)
14. No it is not.
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 10:54 AM
Oct 2020

Nor is the Electoral College.

Nor is the fact that Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota each have two US Senators - a Senator in Wyoming represents only about 500,000 people, while a Senator in California represents around 20 million, and one in Colorado represents about 2.7 million.

That is an imbalance we need to rectify.

TheRickles

(2,063 posts)
17. Idaho, Wyoming, North and South Dakota, plus Montana
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 01:38 PM
Oct 2020

Have the same total population as Los Angeles, yet they have TEN Senators in Congress.

RainCaster

(10,874 posts)
18. There is so much election ratfuckery going on
Sun Oct 25, 2020, 01:43 PM
Oct 2020

All the GOP tricks must be banned:
Photo id's
Purging
Border "adjustments"
Mail-in limits
Vote box limits

Quite realistically, there are so many different tricks being used across the country, that the best thing to do is a comprehensive federal bill.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NoShit...