Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:16 AM Sep 2012

US military deaths in Afghanistan hit 2,000

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — U.S. military deaths in the Afghan war have reached 2,000, a cold reminder of the human cost of an 11-year-old conflict that now garners little public interest at home as the United States prepares to withdraw most of its combat forces by the end of 2014.

The toll has climbed steadily in recent months with a spate of attacks by Afghan army and police — supposed allies — against American and NATO troops. That has raised troubling questions about whether countries in the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan will achieve their aim of helping the government in Kabul and its forces stand on their own after most foreign troops depart in little more than two years.

* * *

Although Obama has pledged that most U.S. combat troops will leave by the end of 2014, American, NATO and allied troops are still dying in Afghanistan at a rate of one a day.

Even with 33,000 American troops back home, the U.S.-led coalition will still have 108,000 troops — including 68,000 from the U.S. — fighting in Afghanistan at the end of this year. Many of those will be training the Afghan National Security Forces that are to replace them.

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/us_military_deaths_in_afghanistan_hit_2000_2/

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US military deaths in Afghanistan hit 2,000 (Original Post) morningfog Sep 2012 OP
Flame away at me, but it is hard to have sympathy for anyone still involved in this clusterfuck. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #1
Surely you can find sympathy for the bereaving families and our scarred nation morningfog Sep 2012 #2
Read my other post. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #5
Hey, lots of these people were kids when they joined. morningfog Sep 2012 #7
Not a flame but merely an observation that Lyndie England (of Abu Ghraib fame) said coalition_unwilling Sep 2012 #3
Sorry, not a good enough reason. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #4
I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree when it comes to coalition_unwilling Sep 2012 #6
This has nothing to do with working class. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #10
You do realize that many, maybe most of those who have died enlisted before 2001? morningfog Sep 2012 #15
And that matters how? Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #18
I am anti-war, without qualification. morningfog Sep 2012 #19
It's the military. They're under orders. They can't just pick-up and leave on their own. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #8
Bullshit. They did not have to join in the first place. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #9
How about those who joined since Jan 20, 2009? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #12
It is totally subjective. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #13
So Obama is deploying troops to subjugate. How -- interesting. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #14
Time to bring them home now. n/t porphyrian Sep 2012 #11
Oh, that's OK. The MIC is still cashing in and now we have drones to win the war. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #16
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #17
Bring. Them. Home. Now. cr8tvlde Sep 2012 #20
 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
1. Flame away at me, but it is hard to have sympathy for anyone still involved in this clusterfuck.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:25 AM
Sep 2012

Nobody cares because it was a stupid idea from the beginning to go into Afghanistan and it is an even more stupid idea to still be there 11 years later.

It's not like someone in the military now can say, "I didn't know I was going to have to go over there".

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
2. Surely you can find sympathy for the bereaving families and our scarred nation
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:28 AM
Sep 2012

if you can't bring yourself to consider the wide variety of reasons (including desperation and poverty) that someone may join the military, even when at war.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
5. Read my other post.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:45 AM
Sep 2012

Killing and subjugating other people for your own comfort is not a good enough reason.

Join a gang if that is a reason, it is the same logic.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
7. Hey, lots of these people were kids when they joined.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 11:10 AM
Sep 2012

I don't expect them to have the best or most well-developed judgment. They are lured in with lies and their desperation is exploited. You can't feel sympathy for them, that's fine. I hope you can understand why I do.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
3. Not a flame but merely an observation that Lyndie England (of Abu Ghraib fame) said
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:30 AM
Sep 2012

the reason she enlisted was that there were no jobs within a 60-mile radius of her home aside from WalMart.

I have sympathy for every victim of the poverty draft (meaning enlisted). Officers (read 'mercenaries' and 'ticket punchers'), not so much. The politicians who put them there: none whatsoever.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
4. Sorry, not a good enough reason.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:44 AM
Sep 2012

Inflicting damage and suffering on other people as a job gets zero sympathy from me.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
6. I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree when it comes to
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 11:09 AM
Sep 2012

the working class and our attitude towards it. ('Enlisted' equals 'working class'.)

Do you have the same opinion of police officers and corrections officers? They also inflict "damage and suffering" on people too, some of whom arguably do not deserve it.

My attitude towards the police has begun to change, based on the LAPD's shabby and brutal treatment of Occupy Los Angeles demonstrators last year. Not quite ready to write the police off in toto, but starting to view them as class traitors and paid agents (read 'mercenaries') of the ruling class.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
10. This has nothing to do with working class.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 12:01 PM
Sep 2012

Lame attempt to not stand up for what is right.

Joining the military is not the same as Police or corrections officers, it is more like joining gangbangers.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
18. And that matters how?
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 09:14 PM
Sep 2012

What does that have to do with killing people in Iraq?

Face it, they had a choice, They choose moral cowardice by not speaking up about what they were doing was wrong.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
19. I am anti-war, without qualification.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 09:19 PM
Sep 2012

One of the reasons is that war exploits the vulnerable in our country by sending them to do the dirty work. But, I still respect and sympathize with as people. War is always wrong. Every person in the military, however, does not deserve to die.

You have no idea how these 2,000 died, what their roles were at the time or what path took them there. Get off you high horse. Or don't, but you are only embarrassing yourself.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
9. Bullshit. They did not have to join in the first place.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 11:59 AM
Sep 2012

And, they do not have to follow orders at any time if they feel it is an unlawful order.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
12. How about those who joined since Jan 20, 2009?
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 12:10 PM
Sep 2012

And the lawfulness of orders is not as subjective as you pretend. That's why the birther officer was court-martialed.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
13. It is totally subjective.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 12:22 PM
Sep 2012

He didn't want to go, he stood up for his belief, right or wrong. He did what he thought was right.

At anytime a person in the military can disobey an order they feel is wrong.

As for those who joined after Jan. 20. 2009, they are biggest idiots of all if they think they would not be deployed to subjugant Afghanistan, Iraq and any other country we don't approve of.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
16. Oh, that's OK. The MIC is still cashing in and now we have drones to win the war.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 04:21 PM
Sep 2012

Well, at least the drones will make it look like we didn't lose it...sort of.

Response to morningfog (Original post)

cr8tvlde

(1,185 posts)
20. Bring. Them. Home. Now.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:10 PM
Sep 2012

George Bush's Murderous Folly. Full employment program for rural and poor kids. We weren't there for "democracy" and the "Afghan National Security Forces" will merge back in with the Taliban and live their own culture like they've done for millenia. Ask the Russians. We got what we went there for ... pipelines and yes, fat contracts for our Military-Industrial-Petro Complex.

Every year we fool ourselves we did the "noble thing" more people get killed.

We need a Vet's bill, however, to give them American infrastructure programs and jobs and to get the Republicans out of the way.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US military deaths in Afg...