Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProof Positive Government Rules and Regulations Work to Save Time, Money, and very important..Lives.
Proof Postive that Government Rules and Regulations can save Time Money and Life..(at no cost to the industry)Republican leaders consistently say that government rules and regulations hinder profit, cost time, money and are generally anti business and worthless. In one industry not only is this not true, but it is lie beyond what we know is truth. Everyone here will accept this truth by the end of reading this post, The Democrats have always been in favor of these rules, proposed them, and helped them pass. Republicans were always against these rules, but many would now admit that they work and should be kept...read on......
Use this argument to destroy the talking point against government rules and regulations..It destroys it completely.
It is about seat belts and other safety requirements.. ..Seat Belts, Air Bags crumple zone ,safer roads,setc.
anti lock brakes..
In 1955 The Ford Motor Company started advertising nationally about a new safety feature that you could get in cars. about . And I remember asking my parents, what are these things called..seat belts? The cost was 50 dollars for two in front seat only...
(that is 250 - 300 in today's money, maybe more) You could get them installed by the dealer,
or order them when you order car. A few years later Ford announced that the extra features were not financially profitable..It seems that few wanted them, and they seemed to be "restrictive" as was said. I remember people saying that and also they couldn't be very "effective" .Let us stop and have a link to a chart that shows that auto deaths were increasing rapidly in the 50s through 1972, then deaths stabilized till 1979..Here is the chart...It is accurate, but lengthy.. from 1911 to present..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in_U.S._by_year
year--- deaths
1911 2,043
1912 2,968
1913 4,079
1914 4,468
1915 6,779
1916 7,766
1917 9,630
1918 10,390
1919 10,896
1920 12,155
1921 13,253
1922 14,859
1923 17,870
1924 18,400
1925 20,771
1926 22,194
1927 24,470
1928 26,557
1929 29,592
1930 31,204
1931 31,963
1932 27,979
1933 29,746
1934 34,240
1935 34,494
1936 36,126
1937 37,819
1938 31,083
1939 30,895
1940 32,914
1941 38,142
1942 27,007
1943
22,727
1944 23,165
1945 26,785
1946 31,874
1947 31,193
1948 30,775
1949 30,246
1950 33,186
1951 35,309
1952 36,088
1953 36,190
1954 33,890
1955 36,688
1956 37,965
1957 36,932
1958 35,331
1959 36,223
1960 36,399
1961 36,285
1962 38,980
1963 41,723
1964 45,645
1965 47,089
1966 50,894
1967 50,724
1968 52,725
1969 53,543
1970 52,627
1971 52,542
1972 54,589
As you can see, by 1972 there was over all ,a gradual increase in deaths from around 10,000 in 1918 to 54,589 in 1972..Then, deaths stabilized till 1979 at 51093 and afterwards, started to fall dramatically over the next 40 years. Here is the rest of the chart from 69 till 2011. Also...from 1979 to 2011 there has been an increase in U.S. population from 225 million to 310 million approx in 2011..Hit the links at wikipedia and see for yourself...40% increase in population and 40 percent decrease in auto deaths on hi ways....look at the chart....from 79 on down.........
1969 53,543
1970 52,627
1971 52,542
1972 54,589
1973 54,052
1974 45,196
1975 44,525
1976 45,523
1977 47,878
1978 50,331
1979 51,093
1980 51,091
1981 49,301
1982 43,945
1983 42,589
1984 44,257
1985 43,825
1986 46,087
1987 46,390
1988 47,087
1989 45,582
1990 44,599
1991 41,508
1992 39,250
1993 40,150
1994 40,716
1995 41,817
1996 42,065
1997 42,013
1998 41,501
1999 41,717
2000 41,945
2001 42,196
2002 43,005
2003 42,643
2004 42,836
2005 43,443
2006 42,642
2007 41,059
2008 37,261
2009 33,808
2010 32885
2011 32,550(estimate)
What caused this change in auto safety? and deaths on the highway?
easy..........Government rules and regulations...seat belts and other safety requirements
It wasn't fewer drivers, because the number of people increased 40 percent from 1979 to 2010...you do the math. In 1979 the estimated population was 225 million. By 2010 the estimated population was 308 million..Last year 2011 it was 310 million a 40 percent increase in population..Yet, from 1979 to 2011 there was a 40 percent drop in auto deaths..Why?
...At first..in the mid 60s, it began to be accepted that seat belts did indeed reduced traffic deaths. Then it was introduced in the early 70s, the shoulder harness seatbelt combo. Finally in the late 70s under the Carter Administration it was mandated that seat belts be installed in the front seats of all cars. New York was the first state in l984 that mandated that people actually wear seat belts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seat_belt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seat_belt_legislation
In 1987 I recall an accident in the national news involving a 1987 Olds equiped with airbags in the front seat only, that hit head on a truck on a undivided highway at 40 mph. The driver had paid several hundred extra to have those airbags installed. He escaped basically unharmed with minor injuries. Thus began the next stage of government regs. Requirement that air bags be installed too. So now in the late years of the first decade of 2000s, we got seat belts with shoulder harnesses, air bags, anti lock breaks, crumple zones and special lighting on the outside of cars that did not exist in 1955. Rules that these safety devises must be on cars. . The belts are now front and back for all passengers..State regulations that children under certain ages be in child restraint devices and
air bags in the side in all new cars..and so on.
So there it is, government regulations on the manufacturing of cars that make them safer, and state laws that require people to use the belts.. At first the auto companies resisted putting these features on, but eventually costs became such that if given years warning in advance, the costs became much smaller and with mass production, much easier to add on, if put in during design phase of new models. The auto companies just pass the costs on to the consumer with very little effort. Consumers pay, cause they know these features work..so how do they know? After many years of use, there are so many actual stories from person to person whose lives were saved by seat belts and the air bags that people make sure they belt their kids in as well as themselves.
The republican arguement against rules and regulations falls apart due to the simple facts themselves. As people were required to wear seatbelts, deaths were reduced greatly. Tens of millions in the costs of series injuries were avoided, and incredible amounts of time in hospitals and major disabilities were prevented. Every republican leader and friend in this country should see this chart and will easily understand the lie in their own argument. Rules and Regulations work and work well. This is not a small fact...Tens of thousands of lives have been saved..Countless hours in hospital and recovery are eliminated..
Oh..repubicans, libertarians, etc.........
if you do not want to put on your seat belt, well, that is your business.
I don't recommend that ever
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 1572 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post