General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge formally dismisses Michael Flynn case after Trump pardon
After lying to the FBI and to members of Trump's administration in early 2017, Flynn lost his job as national security adviser, setting in motion a series of events that led to Trump firing FBI Director James Comey and the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate Russian interference in the election and the President obstructing justice.
In December 2017, Flynn became one of the most significant and earliest defendants to plead guilty and cooperate in the Mueller investigation. Earlier this year, Flynn -- represented by a new set of lawyers, including Sidney Powell -- and the Justice Department attempted to undo his guilty plea in court.
The case often has fueled Trump's smears of Mueller's investigation as a "witch hunt," leading to the eventual pardon last month.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/08/politics/michael-flynn/index.html
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)He'll eventually get caught doing something he wasn't pardoned for.
spanone
(135,857 posts)In formally ending Flynns three-year legal saga, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan said he probably would have denied the Justice Departments controversial effort this year to drop the case, which Democrats and many legal experts said appeared to be an attempt by Attorney General William P. Barr to bend the rule of law to help a Trump ally.
Sullivan expressed deep skepticism about the Justice Departments stated reasons for abandoning the case, criticizing it for applying a different set of rules to Flynn, who twice pleaded guilty to lying about his contacts with Russias ambassador during special counsel Robert S. Mueller IIIs probe of 2016 election interference.
The judge also said he was troubled by the governments dubious rationales as well as aspects of its ever-evolving justifications that ignored applicable law, appeared to be irrelevant or to contradict prosecutors previous statements.
***PayWall***https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/michael-flynn-case-dismissed/2020/12/08/31abb5de-0975-11eb-a166-dc429b380d10_story.html
Cameliano
(54 posts)Presidents shouldn't pardon people.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Trump abused the power - as he's abused most of his powers - but that doesn't mean a president shouldn't have it.
Cameliano
(54 posts)That's a tradition that comes from the kings.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 74:
"The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity, that without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel."
Moostache
(9,897 posts)If framed, then why the need for a pardon?
If innocent, then why the confessions?
If too stupid to know better, why not just admit it?
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)it's possible to have been framed and still deserve a pardon. In fact, a person who was convicted as a result of having been framed is a prime candidate for a pardon.
For example, Clarence Norris, the last survivor of the Scottsboro Boys, who were framed for and convicted of a rape that never happened, was pardoned decades after his conviction. It wasn't a presidential pardon - he was pardoned by, of all people, Alabama Governor George Wallace.
no_hypocrisy
(46,151 posts)exboyfil
(17,865 posts)of conspiracy to kidnap? Also Flynn's son doesn't have a pardon to this point. He seems like someone that should be pursued since Flynn reneged on the first plea deal.