Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,755 posts)
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 12:17 AM Dec 2020

Sidney Powell's secret 'military intelligence expert' never worked in military intelligence

The witness is code-named “Spyder.” Or sometimes “Spider.” His identity is so closely guarded that lawyer Sidney Powell has sought to keep it even from opposing counsel. And his account of vulnerability to international sabotage is a key part of Powell’s failing multistate effort to invalidate President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

Powell describes Spyder in court filings as a former “Military Intelligence expert,” and his testimony is offered to support one of her central claims. In a declaration filed in four states, Spyder alleges that publicly available data about server traffic shows that voting systems in the United States were “certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.”

Spyder, it turns out, is Joshua Merritt, a 43-year-old information technology consultant in the Dallas area.
Merritt confirmed his role as Powell’s secret witness in phone interviews this week with The Washington Post.

Records show that Merritt is an Army veteran and that he enrolled in a training program at the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion, the unit he cites in his declaration. But he never completed the entry-level training course, according to Meredith Mingledorff, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence, which includes the battalion.

“He kept washing out of courses,” said Mingledorff, citing his education records. “He’s not an intelligence analyst.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-spider-spyder-witness/2020/12/11/0cd567e6-3b2a-11eb-98c4-25dc9f4987e8_story.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sidney Powell's secret 'military intelligence expert' never worked in military intelligence (Original Post) Zorro Dec 2020 OP
It appears he was too dumb to sit in a classroom dalton99a Dec 2020 #1
Dimwit thought she could hide the facts and lie without exposure? msfiddlestix Dec 2020 #2
These half assed "lawyers" that surround trump and his idiots dixiegrrrrl Dec 2020 #3
I've been wondering about this point for a long time msfiddlestix Dec 2020 #4
I agree. These frivolous lawsuits should not be allowed to stand without repercussion. On Chris c-rational Dec 2020 #6
Curious as to why the Bar hasn't done it yet. msfiddlestix Dec 2020 #7
A state bar will accept a complaint from anyone, I believe dixiegrrrrl Dec 2020 #9
hard to believe they haven't been flooded with complaints at this point msfiddlestix Dec 2020 #10
+1 c-rational Dec 2020 #5
He qualified as a "wheeled vehicle technician" yellowcanine Dec 2020 #8

msfiddlestix

(7,288 posts)
2. Dimwit thought she could hide the facts and lie without exposure?
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 12:26 AM
Dec 2020

derangement doesn't even cover it. Wonder if historians could possibly capture the breadth of insanity.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
3. These half assed "lawyers" that surround trump and his idiots
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 12:35 AM
Dec 2020

should be reported to their respective state Bar Assoc. Filing frivolous, and dishonest, lawsuits is illegal.
Assuming they are even licensed.

msfiddlestix

(7,288 posts)
4. I've been wondering about this point for a long time
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 10:07 AM
Dec 2020

Although many others have expressed the same sentiment but I never see DU lawyers making that point, or at least I haven't read any from du lawyers. I agree this should have happened long before now. Recently I've seen something referred to as Rule 11, (if memory serves) or Article 11? A ruling any of the judges could/should apply to Giulianni et al, but don't remember reading any report that has been done. I'm not even clear on which states these clown "lawyers" have legal status for bringing an action to these various courts.

I'm 70 years old, and have never seen anything like this in my life. I'm praying this nightmare ends now.

c-rational

(2,600 posts)
6. I agree. These frivolous lawsuits should not be allowed to stand without repercussion. On Chris
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 11:29 AM
Dec 2020

Cuomo last night, the PA AG stated the Bar could sanction these lawyers for wasting the public's money and time. I hope this is followed through with. This AG said they were looking into their options. I hope the Supreme Court ruling ends this but these reThugs will not stop until put down.

msfiddlestix

(7,288 posts)
7. Curious as to why the Bar hasn't done it yet.
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 12:13 PM
Dec 2020

I think I read somewhere that the onus of responsibility or jurisdiction would be each state bar? Wonder if they depend on a petition of some sort. Well whatever the case, they all seem to be silent on the matter.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
9. A state bar will accept a complaint from anyone, I believe
Sun Dec 13, 2020, 01:23 AM
Dec 2020


Most often it is a client who reports a lawyers wrong doing.
But any solid factual complaint should be effective.
In truth, I think it would carry more weight coming from an official or a "public" person.
and often the negative news reporting concerning a lawyer is noticed by the bar where they are licensed.

It is clear to us that these dipshit trump lawyers are filing nuisance suits, but I think the courts can ask for bar sanctions.

msfiddlestix

(7,288 posts)
10. hard to believe they haven't been flooded with complaints at this point
Sun Dec 13, 2020, 11:11 AM
Dec 2020

makes me wonder what's the point of their existence.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sidney Powell's secret 'm...