General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSidney Powell's secret 'military intelligence expert' never worked in military intelligence
The witness is code-named Spyder. Or sometimes Spider. His identity is so closely guarded that lawyer Sidney Powell has sought to keep it even from opposing counsel. And his account of vulnerability to international sabotage is a key part of Powells failing multistate effort to invalidate President-elect Joe Bidens victory.
Powell describes Spyder in court filings as a former Military Intelligence expert, and his testimony is offered to support one of her central claims. In a declaration filed in four states, Spyder alleges that publicly available data about server traffic shows that voting systems in the United States were certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.
Spyder, it turns out, is Joshua Merritt, a 43-year-old information technology consultant in the Dallas area.
Merritt confirmed his role as Powells secret witness in phone interviews this week with The Washington Post.
Records show that Merritt is an Army veteran and that he enrolled in a training program at the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion, the unit he cites in his declaration. But he never completed the entry-level training course, according to Meredith Mingledorff, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence, which includes the battalion.
He kept washing out of courses, said Mingledorff, citing his education records. Hes not an intelligence analyst.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-spider-spyder-witness/2020/12/11/0cd567e6-3b2a-11eb-98c4-25dc9f4987e8_story.html
dalton99a
(81,683 posts)Intelligence, my ass
msfiddlestix
(7,288 posts)derangement doesn't even cover it. Wonder if historians could possibly capture the breadth of insanity.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)should be reported to their respective state Bar Assoc. Filing frivolous, and dishonest, lawsuits is illegal.
Assuming they are even licensed.
msfiddlestix
(7,288 posts)Although many others have expressed the same sentiment but I never see DU lawyers making that point, or at least I haven't read any from du lawyers. I agree this should have happened long before now. Recently I've seen something referred to as Rule 11, (if memory serves) or Article 11? A ruling any of the judges could/should apply to Giulianni et al, but don't remember reading any report that has been done. I'm not even clear on which states these clown "lawyers" have legal status for bringing an action to these various courts.
I'm 70 years old, and have never seen anything like this in my life. I'm praying this nightmare ends now.
c-rational
(2,600 posts)Cuomo last night, the PA AG stated the Bar could sanction these lawyers for wasting the public's money and time. I hope this is followed through with. This AG said they were looking into their options. I hope the Supreme Court ruling ends this but these reThugs will not stop until put down.
msfiddlestix
(7,288 posts)I think I read somewhere that the onus of responsibility or jurisdiction would be each state bar? Wonder if they depend on a petition of some sort. Well whatever the case, they all seem to be silent on the matter.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Most often it is a client who reports a lawyers wrong doing.
But any solid factual complaint should be effective.
In truth, I think it would carry more weight coming from an official or a "public" person.
and often the negative news reporting concerning a lawyer is noticed by the bar where they are licensed.
It is clear to us that these dipshit trump lawyers are filing nuisance suits, but I think the courts can ask for bar sanctions.
msfiddlestix
(7,288 posts)makes me wonder what's the point of their existence.
yellowcanine
(35,703 posts)Pretty much the same as military intelligence, right?