Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
Mon Dec 14, 2020, 06:48 PM Dec 2020

I wonder if John Roberts is rethinking his delusion that the Voting Rights Act is no longer needed

... given what he's seen over the past few weeks.

Nearly 50 years later, things have changed dramatically. Largely because of the Voting Rights Act, “[v]oter turnout and registration rates” in covered jurisdictions “now approach parity. Blatantly discriminatory evasions of federal decrees are rare. And minority candidates hold office at unprecedented levels.” The tests and devices that blocked ballot access have
been forbidden nationwide for over 40 years. Yet the Act has not eased §5’s restrictions or narrowed the scope of §4’s coverage formula along the way. Instead those extraordinary and unprecedented features have been reauthorized as if nothing has changed, and they have grown even stronger.

Chief Justice John Roberts, Shelby v. Holder, 2013

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-96_6k47.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi7zKvexM7tAhUBP6wKHag1AnkQFjAAegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw1-7OfT6EiAHCb7Mebj2j-D
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Solomon

(12,310 posts)
8. Yes. Like Renquist he spent a good portion of his career working against voting rights.
Mon Dec 14, 2020, 11:39 PM
Dec 2020

The supreme court is how they get rewarded for such glorious work. Never ceases to amaze me the accolades and hope that people heap upon asshole like Roberts.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
2. Those "test and devices" were being implemented the year he made this judgement. Its overt racism to
Mon Dec 14, 2020, 06:55 PM
Dec 2020

... willfully be blind to overt racism, either Roberts with an adversary of equal rights or and idiot to the same.

Neither is preferred where he sits.

This judgement was as disgustingly willfully blind or overtly ignorant as to ways outside companies can get past election finance laws (till to this day) in the US like Rudy Giuliani's Friends did.

SWBTATTReg

(22,114 posts)
6. Good question...especially after all of the crap that rump and thugs have been doing...
Mon Dec 14, 2020, 07:27 PM
Dec 2020

and are still doing...

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,340 posts)
9. Surely if Roberts is right, black people hold significant % of elected offices in the south ...
Tue Dec 15, 2020, 01:33 AM
Dec 2020


(source: Reasonbly Prudent Person as reported in https://www.democraticunderground.com/100214710882 )

Hekate

(90,674 posts)
10. It's hard to know, isn't it? I was sick at heart when he did that...
Tue Dec 15, 2020, 05:23 AM
Dec 2020

One of the great legislative accomplishments of my lifetime, the Voting Rights Act, was overturned by that fool and his cohort. Unbelievable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I wonder if John Roberts ...