Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI wonder if John Roberts is rethinking his delusion that the Voting Rights Act is no longer needed
... given what he's seen over the past few weeks.
Nearly 50 years later, things have changed dramatically. Largely because of the Voting Rights Act, [v]oter turnout and registration rates in covered jurisdictions now approach parity. Blatantly discriminatory evasions of federal decrees are rare. And minority candidates hold office at unprecedented levels. The tests and devices that blocked ballot access have
been forbidden nationwide for over 40 years. Yet the Act has not eased §5s restrictions or narrowed the scope of §4s coverage formula along the way. Instead those extraordinary and unprecedented features have been reauthorized as if nothing has changed, and they have grown even stronger.
Chief Justice John Roberts, Shelby v. Holder, 2013
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-96_6k47.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi7zKvexM7tAhUBP6wKHag1AnkQFjAAegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw1-7OfT6EiAHCb7Mebj2j-D
been forbidden nationwide for over 40 years. Yet the Act has not eased §5s restrictions or narrowed the scope of §4s coverage formula along the way. Instead those extraordinary and unprecedented features have been reauthorized as if nothing has changed, and they have grown even stronger.
Chief Justice John Roberts, Shelby v. Holder, 2013
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-96_6k47.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi7zKvexM7tAhUBP6wKHag1AnkQFjAAegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw1-7OfT6EiAHCb7Mebj2j-D
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1260 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wonder if John Roberts is rethinking his delusion that the Voting Rights Act is no longer needed (Original Post)
StarfishSaver
Dec 2020
OP
Yes. Like Renquist he spent a good portion of his career working against voting rights.
Solomon
Dec 2020
#8
Those "test and devices" were being implemented the year he made this judgement. Its overt racism to
uponit7771
Dec 2020
#2
Good question...especially after all of the crap that rump and thugs have been doing...
SWBTATTReg
Dec 2020
#6
Surely if Roberts is right, black people hold significant % of elected offices in the south ...
Hermit-The-Prog
Dec 2020
#9
dem4decades
(11,288 posts)1. He knew what he was doing. He succeeded.
Solomon
(12,310 posts)8. Yes. Like Renquist he spent a good portion of his career working against voting rights.
The supreme court is how they get rewarded for such glorious work. Never ceases to amaze me the accolades and hope that people heap upon asshole like Roberts.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)2. Those "test and devices" were being implemented the year he made this judgement. Its overt racism to
... willfully be blind to overt racism, either Roberts with an adversary of equal rights or and idiot to the same.
Neither is preferred where he sits.
This judgement was as disgustingly willfully blind or overtly ignorant as to ways outside companies can get past election finance laws (till to this day) in the US like Rudy Giuliani's Friends did.
intheflow
(28,463 posts)3. Source? n/t
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)5. Sorry - accidentally deleted the link. Re-added it.
intheflow
(28,463 posts)7. Thanks.
malaise
(268,968 posts)4. That is what created this entire mess
Rec
SWBTATTReg
(22,114 posts)6. Good question...especially after all of the crap that rump and thugs have been doing...
and are still doing...
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,340 posts)9. Surely if Roberts is right, black people hold significant % of elected offices in the south ...
(source: Reasonbly Prudent Person as reported in https://www.democraticunderground.com/100214710882 )
Hekate
(90,674 posts)10. It's hard to know, isn't it? I was sick at heart when he did that...
One of the great legislative accomplishments of my lifetime, the Voting Rights Act, was overturned by that fool and his cohort. Unbelievable.