General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS Army felt it necessary to give on-the-record statement denying it would help with a coup
Link to tweet
Garrett M. Graff
@vermontgmg
·
Dec 20, 2020
Lets not forget as we enter the week that the US Army felt it necessary to give on-the-record statement denying that it would participate in a coup this weekend. Thats not normal. And not something we should look past.
Garrett M. Graff
@vermontgmg
ICYMI:
Ryan Browne
@rabrowne75
Army Secretary McCarthy (@SecArmy) and Army Chief of Staff General McConville (@ArmyChiefStaff) statement from yesterday: There is no role for the U.S. military in determining the outcome of an American election.
6:53 PM · Dec 20, 2020
Frasier Balzov
(2,663 posts)that military rule be imposed upon certain states where Trump believes that the election should be re-run.
COL Mustard
(5,913 posts)An an Army officer and as a Federal civilian employee. In each case I took an oath to the Constitution, not to a President, nor to a political party. The Army will not impose martial law to overturn the election, nor to rerun the election (how would one even do that?).....and any order to do so would be on its face illegal.
As I've said elsewhere, officers in particular are expected to use their moral authority to not obey illegal orders. It's why the oath of office does not bind us to obey the orders of the President or the officers appointed over us. There is no way to legally disobey a legal order, but there is also no way to obey an illegal one. This would be a clear-cut no go.
doc03
(35,358 posts)to stop.
Mr.Bill
(24,311 posts)rpannier
(24,330 posts)and none of the members will be named Mr Scott or Uhura... nor Kirk, Spock, McCoy, or Chekov
COL Mustard
(5,913 posts)Unless you REALLY need your SAG card!
Solly Mack
(90,778 posts)That is beyond the rational, that they would have to make such a statement. That it came to that point.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I know that the election of 1856 was contested and resulted in Buchanan making a deal that would lead to the Civil War. But has there ever been a situation where the outgoing president tried to use the military to overturn the peoples will?
JoeOtterbein
(7,702 posts)...and laughing loudly when they retreat, shivering in shameless fear!
NoMoreRepugs
(9,449 posts)made by the COS USArmy - intentional IMO. One statement for ALL the branches.
Hekate
(90,755 posts)...the message to Americans that, The Military will hold to their oaths.
Zorro
(15,745 posts)I would not put it past him to consider firing the JCS and installing Flynn as some uber commander of all military forces.
Lock him up.
(6,937 posts)dawn5651
(604 posts)get involved in the united states election is beyond me...he doesn't seem to understand that a democracy is for the people by the people....i will be glad when he gets the hell out of the peoples house he fouls it up every day.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,564 posts)JFC. What a state of affairs when the Army says it won't be blowing up its own country any time soon. It's unbelievable that this isn't being shouted from every rooftop in America, along with a giant "WTF???"
It's just as unbelievable that it happened at all.
Nitram
(22,843 posts)or issue any statement that gives credence to the possibility of such a thing happening because that would normalize the crazy talk. They watch and listen until such a time as someone has taken a step that will put them in prison. The fact that the Military did issue such a statement indicates they were extremely concerned that a move might made by the executive branch towards ordering an inappropriate military intervention. No one can take such a step in until the executive branch has committed themselves to a clearly illegal act. If an order had been issued, that would have been the red line that would have set both the deep state and the military motion to take steps to counter such a move. If they commit themselves prematurely, they can (and would) be sued in court. this is uncharted territory, and you can be sure everybody was on high alert, but very careful not to take a false step.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Otherwise the orange one might get some stupid ideas.
world wide wally
(21,749 posts)He's batshit fucking insane
LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)If he sent a letter to Congress invoking the 25th Amendment, and did it after they recess, then Trump's power would be suspended until Congress acts.
They would have 21 days starting when they go back into session on the 6th, which would make the whole thing moot.
cstanleytech
(26,306 posts)to protect and defend the Constitution and no where in that does it give the President the power to declare martial law in order to void an election he lost.
TomSlick
(11,103 posts)would be patently illegal. Anything coming from that illegal declaration would be equally illegal.
Officers have a moral and legal duty to disobey illegal orders. Obeying an illegal order is criminal.
An officer's duty is to the Constitution not the president.
BlueWavePsych
(2,635 posts)MerryBlooms
(11,770 posts)Roisin Ni Fiachra
(2,574 posts)Trump and acting of Defense Secretary Miller are plotting a takeover of the government.
"Pentagon abruptly halts Biden transition- MAKES NO SENSE. CLAIM THEY ARE OVERWHELMED. DOD GOES OPAQUE. TRUMP-MILLER UP TO NO GOOD. DANGER. -" tweeted McCaffrey, who is a well-known and highly-respected NBC News and MSNBC military analyst.
Last month (video below) McCaffrey expressed great concern about Trump getting rid of senior Pentagon officials including his Secretary of Defense and substituting them with top Trump loyalists. McCaffrey said he was "alarmed" with the shakeup.
snip---
"If I was a CIA officer trying to understand what was going on in a third-world country and I saw this pattern of behavior, I would say the strongman's trying to take over the government and defy an election."
https://www.rawstory.com/trumps-acting-pentagon-chief/