General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFoley & Lardner statement about partner Cleta Mitchell's participation in GA call
Link to tweet
Josh Marshall
@joshtpm
lol now @FoleyandLardner says "We are aware of, and are concerned by, Ms. Mitchells participation in the January 2 conference call and are working to understand her involvement more thoroughly." like hours ago they were saying not our problem
Firm Response to Reports of Partner Cleta Mitchells Involvement in Post-Election Challenges |...
Foley & Lardner LLP is not representing any parties seeking to contest the results of the presidential election.
foley.com
10:55 AM · Jan 4, 2021
https://www.foley.com/en/insights/news/2021/01/firm-response-reports-partner-cleta-mitchells
grumpyduck
(6,240 posts)rsdsharp
(9,186 posts)Shes a RWNJ.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Was that some nazi reference or am I overthinking it?
obamanut2012
(26,083 posts)And is at a private firm.
Budi
(15,325 posts)(Cleta Mitchell also was a past board member of the NRA)
From CNBC/June 2019
SNIP
Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon brought in conservative attorney Cleta Mitchell to represent his nonprofit.
Mitchell was a skeptic of the Mueller probe and was listed as a potential witness by the House Intel Committee looking into the Trump campaign's ties to Russia.
Bannon's decision to hire Mitchell comes as he continues to protect the identity of his contributors and works to stay in the good graces of President Donald Trump.
MORE...
Steve Bannon hires D.C. super lawyer and Mueller skeptic to represent his nonprofit
PUBLISHED TUE, JUN 25 2019
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/06/25/bannon-hires-mueller-skeptic-cleta-mitchell-to-represent-his-nonprofit.html
Gothmog
(145,351 posts)The Lincoln Project got Jones Day to drop trump as a client. This will be fun to watch
Link to tweet
Of course Im talking about Foley & Lardner partner Cleta Mitchells participation in Donald Trumps harassing of Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to just find 11,780 votes. It seems that the never-Trump PAC The Lincoln Project has turned their attention to Biglaw over the incident.
Link to tweet
There are already murmurs of Foley losing business over Mitchells involvement in the debacle, and tweets like these from The Lincoln Project only ups the pressure.
And they arent the only PAC paying attention to Biglaw. MeidasTouch remember they are the ones that actually drew first blood in the campaign against Jones Day has turned their attention to Foley & Lardner. One the the PACs founders, Ben Meiselas, partner at Geragos & Geragos, has been very vocal about the firms involvement, specifically when Foley attorney Jason Villalba tweeted (though hes since deleted it) about the now infamous phone call without condemning Mitchells involvement.
Gothmog
(145,351 posts)This was predictable. Big Law does not like radicals
Link to tweet
Mitchells resignation came after the law firm on Monday issued a statement saying it was concerned by her role in the call. The firm noted that as a matter of policy, its attorneys do not represent any parties seeking to contest the results of the election.
The Washington Post on Sunday published audio and a transcript of the hour-long call in which Trump pressured Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to overturn the election results. During the call, Mitchell complained that she had not been given access to certain information from Raffenspergers office, and Trump relied on her to an extraordinary degree during the call.,....
In its statement on Tuesday, the law firm said: Cleta Mitchell has informed firm management of her decision to resign from Foley & Lardner effective immediately. Ms. Mitchell concluded that her departure was in the firms best interests, as well as in her own personal best interests. We thank her for her contributions to the firm and wish her well.