Being Ignorant is not a defense for sedition

[DSandra]

One cannot defend themselves against sedition by claiming that they didn't know that the evidence for voter fraud was fake, everyone has the duty to make sure their evidence checks out, and Trump has lost over 60 cases, numerous recounts, and every discrepancy has either been explained reasonably or was relatively insignificant, and everything points against election fraud. Knowing all of this and continuing to claim that the election was stolen is knowingly committing sedition and should be punished to the full extent of the law.

[zaj]

1. Having a dispute is not a defense for insurrection, ever.

Our democracy is the rightful government. You being pissed that others are getting *their* way isn't an excuse.