Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
Mon Oct 8, 2012, 10:34 PM Oct 2012

Obama's Monument to Cesar Chavez: can we talk about global worker unionization in honor of this?

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/08/us/obama-chavez-monument/index.html
(CNN) -- Describing it as a "day that has been a long time coming," President Barack Obama made modern history Monday by announcing the creation of a monument to honor the late labor and civil rights activist Cesar Chavez.

The Cesar E. Chavez National Monument becomes the 398th unit in the National Park Service system, and the first honoring a Latino born later than the 1700s, the Park Service told CNN.

It's no coincidence the move comes less than a month before Election Day, as the president maintains a strong lead among Latinos. A big turnout among Latino supporters in states where the race is close could help Obama win re-election against GOP challenger Mitt Romney.

For starters: What reason would we have, as a party, to oppose striking down the fraudulently-named "right to work" laws?

What reason would non-right wingers not have to join the Industrial Workers of the World and talk about them with other people?

We need to work this out so that workers around the world can beat the war of exploitation being waged on the working class.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama's Monument to Cesar Chavez: can we talk about global worker unionization in honor of this? (Original Post) Zalatix Oct 2012 OP
Coincidentally, when I drove past with my 16 year old daughter Nevernose Oct 2012 #1
More info tama Oct 2012 #2
Compelling stuff there, Tama Zalatix Oct 2012 #4
Repeal Taft-Hartley PD Turk Oct 2012 #3
Repeal Citizens United, corporate personhood, Taft-Hartley Zalatix Oct 2012 #5
Exactly PD Turk Oct 2012 #6

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
1. Coincidentally, when I drove past with my 16 year old daughter
Mon Oct 8, 2012, 10:39 PM
Oct 2012

This summer, the site prompted a stop for me to explain that not only was I born during a Bob Dylan concert, but that I was born during a boycott of grapes, as well. And no matter how bad Baby Boomers or Gen X have fucked things up, she needs to be on the forefront of a long struggle to make things better.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
2. More info
Mon Oct 8, 2012, 11:58 PM
Oct 2012
The unions, at least, understand that there is a better way. They see immigration reform as an issue of worker empowerment. If undocumented immigrants undercut wages and job conditions for Americans — and many do, by tolerating low pay and abuse and bolstering an off-the-books system that robs law-abiding employers and taxpayers — it is because they cannot stand up for their rights.

“Workers don’t depress wages. Unscrupulous employers do,” said Terence O’Sullivan, president of the Laborers’ International Union of North America. Unemployment in his industry is above 21 percent. Nearly two million construction workers are out of work. So what does Mr. O’Sullivan want? Reform that allows immigrants to legalize. “If we can free them so they can come out of the shadows, we can not only improve their lives, but all workers’ lives,” he said.

Eliseo Medina, the international executive vice president of the Service Employees International Union, agreed. “First and foremost, this is an economic argument,” he said.

Making the pro-union case for reform is not necessarily going to be easy. Even as immigration has changed the face of many American unions, hostility to foreigners remains a problem among some of the rank and file. Mr. Medina said union leaders were going to have to work hard to make members understand that false populism was not on their side.

“You may not want to do this because you like José Rodríguez,” Mr. Medina said, “but this affects you. Your standard of living is not going to improve, and you’re not going to be in a stronger position to solve your problems as long as you have all of these people out there without any rights — without any ability to contribute. Things will only get worse, not better.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/opinion/21tues1.html?_r=0




These foreign born workers are combative and militant, and make the best union members, yet no major labor union will fight for them. In many respects, even the United Farm Workers Union has now withdrawn much of its support since it joined the reformist AFL-CIO.

This is not to deny that there are no labor organizations at all representing undocumented workers. Seventeen percent of them in this country are now union members. In addition, there are independent unions and associations like the Texas Farmworkers Union, CASA-General Brotherhood of Workers, and the Farm Labor Organizing Committee, which represents immigrant workers. But the independent farm worker unions and associations are not united in a nationwide effort or allied with organized labor. That must be one of the major tasks of the IWW. We must actively seek to recruit, represent, and organize undocumented workers and other immigrants, and affiliate with the independent unions and immigrant workers associations. The IWW must fight for these workers' rights and against the racism and xenophobia conjured up by the government and the bosses. The IWW must unite with foreign born workers and make their demands part of the demands for the entire working class for better conditions and humane treatment. Only by fighting for the most oppressed workers can we dare to call ourselves representative of the working class. We must demand:

an end to discrimination against foreign born workers. Union wage levels for all work performed.
improved working and living conditions, including being provided with union-approved low cost housing.
social and working benefits as native born workers.
the right to organize Labor unions without employer or government interference.
land to the tillers, and the disbanding of agribusiness conglomerates. Worker's should seize land if government will not provide them with land and implements.
creation of an independent Farm Labor Commission by unions to investigate the conditions of farm laborers and ensure that their living and working conditions meet federal safety standards and do not violate Labor laws, or the civil rights of workers.
an end to harassment and deportation by La Migra, the Immigration and Nationalization Service's police.
free immigration to the US for all who wish to work.
the freedom of all immigrants confined in federal or State prison for mere entry into the country.

http://www.iww.org/en/culture/articles/tsunami/tsunami4.shtml


Couple links to immigrant unions mentioned above:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Farm_Workers_Union
http://www.supportfloc.org/Pages/default.aspx

In my view both the AFL-CIO reformist approach to change immigration laws working through system and work of IWW and illegal immigrant unions to organize and strengthen labor unity are needed.
 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
4. Compelling stuff there, Tama
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 03:50 AM
Oct 2012

Mass unionization completely bypasses the employer's tactic of using immigrants to cut wages and enable workplace abuse.

Immigrants are going back home right now and leaving these employers high and dry. This is a perfect time for those still here to organize and force better conditions. I wish the mainstream labor organizations would help them seize upon that.

PD Turk

(1,289 posts)
3. Repeal Taft-Hartley
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 01:12 AM
Oct 2012

If we could repeal that abomination, we'd get rid of the "rtw" laws in one fell swoop.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's Monument to Cesar...