General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBudweiser becomes latest Super Bowl commercial stalwart to sit out this year's broadcast
With funny frogs, adorable puppies and its iconic Clydesdale horses, Budweiser has become synonymous with Super Bowl advertising over the past four decades, producing some of the most memorable commercials in the history of television's marquee live event.
This year, however, the brand is taking a pass.
Budweiser announced Monday morning that it is foregoing its annual Super Bowl commercial slot for the first time in 37 years, joining fellow juggernauts Coke, Hyundai and Pepsi in skipping this year's Super Bowl broadcast amid the financial uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The beer brand said in a news release that instead of paying to air a Super Bowl ad, it will instead be "reallocating the media investment" to raise awareness about the COVID-19 vaccine throughout the year, in partnership with the Ad Council.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/budweiser-becomes-latest-super-bowl-commercial-stalwart-to-sit-out-this-years-broadcast/ar-BB1d4uwt?ocid=NL_ENUS_D1_20210125_8_2
dem4decades
(11,297 posts)edhopper
(33,587 posts)not captured.
signed the Grammar Nazi.
dem4decades
(11,297 posts)TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)That made me laugh.
edhopper
(33,587 posts)make errahs.; )
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,786 posts)Oh well. Budweiser is now owned by the Belgian company that bottles Stella Atrois.
onenote
(42,714 posts)The parent company not only owns Stella Artois, but also Labatts, Bass, and Becks, among other brands.
Bluethroughu
(5,172 posts)Good on them.
StarryNite
(9,446 posts)nattyice
(331 posts)With horrendous side-effects.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)the Super Bowl would be the best place to do so.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)Two, small-market teams (TB and KC). Probably figured the cost of the ads would outweigh the benefit.
-Laelth