General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Supreme Court vacated lower court rulings in TX abortion battle.
This is a victory for abortion rights.
Gov. Greg Abbot ordered a halt to nonessential medical procedures in late March of last year to conserve hospital resources and personal protective equipment. Attorney General Ken Paxton then said the order applied to "any type of abortions," including medical abortions that do not involve surgery.
A federal judge in Texas declared the order too broad and lifted the ban. But the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans put it back in place. In public health emergencies, the appeals court said, a state can restrict constitutional rights including, "one's right to peaceably assemble, to publicly worship, to travel, and even to leave one's home. The right to abortion is no exception."
....
In a brief order, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and vacated the 5th Circuit's ruling.
Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)MontanaMama
(23,322 posts)Lots of ground to make up on abortion rights so I'm happy with any and all gains.
spanone
(135,846 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,641 posts)NoRoadUntravelled
(2,626 posts)Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,356 posts)Remember this court ruled against Cuomo's limitation of church gatherings during the pandemic.
Mr.Bill
(24,303 posts)rpannier
(24,330 posts)Abbott issued a new order a short time later that allowed abortions in Texas to resume, but the state asked the Supreme Court to keep the appeals court rulings on the books. The decisions "have been cited hundreds of times in courts across the country" in legal disputes over Covid-19 restrictions, lawyers for the state told the court.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)SKKY
(11,813 posts)...I just don't.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,744 posts)What "conservative" means in the context of legal decisions is sometimes quite different from what it means in politics.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)from what I understand. I dont believe that Roberts want to come close to repealing Roe v Wade. Not sure about Kavanaugh, he is a catholic, but maybe not as doctrinaire as the right hoped. The ruling was likely 5-4, with Roberts and Gorsuch joining the progressives, or 6-3 with Kavanaugh. Those would be my best guesses, but it would be nice if Barrette is pulling a David Souter on the right now that she has a job for life.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,036 posts)onenote
(42,715 posts)The underlying order that was being challenged had expired. There was a second abortion rights case that was vacated -- that was an appeal by the state of Tennessee challenging a ruling that' had invalidated the order.
So, while many many armchair lawyers on DU are reaching snap judgments about these various orders, they seem to be missing the big picture: these were essentially unanimous decisions applying a pretty basic principle of law -- that when the action that is being challenged isn't taking place any more, the case is moot and leaving the ruling in place would effectively be an advisory opinion -- something the courts don't issue.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,564 posts)Makes the ruling all the better. I hope they're eating their livers.