Why isn't Santorum gushing over Bush?

[Blue Owl]

I mean, if the GOP was so wonderful during the eight years before Obama, wouldn't Santorum remind people of that fine Bush legacy?

[arcane1]

1. Repubs can only reference Bush if they claim to have become libertarians in 2009 n/t

[Siwsan]

2. He who must not be named??

The current crop of rethuglican candidates pretty much all seem to be suffering from sporatic 'missing time' syndrome. They remember Regan, they remember Clinton, but the administrations in between and after are a blank, up until the current.

[tridim]

3. Must. Resist. Obvious. Joke. nt

[sofa king]

4. Can you help me get that image out of my head, please?

Fortunately, I've just invented the solution:



Unfortunately, I foresee problems in development.

[spanone]

5. N O B O D Y mentions bu$h*....it's as if those 8 years never existed

it was eight years of spending like drunken sailors and looting the peoples money

[opihimoimoi]

6. Prolly because W was a Idiot and clueless

&feature=related

[Quantess]

7. Uh oh. Better get out the rubber sheets.

[madinmaryland]

9. Probably quite frothy, also.

[Old and In the Way]

8. Yeah, that's weird.

Bush was the best taxcutter evah! He was the strongest C-in-C evah! Yet, oddly, there's nary a mention of him. Reminds me of the old Soviet Union where as soon as the old leader is offed, he seems to disappear from history as well.